Elena RybakinavsZheng Qinwen
ZQYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Elena Rybakina 5/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Elena Rybakina |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Elena Rybakina Elena Rybakina holds a superior head-to-head record against Zheng Qinwen and has historically performed well at the US Open hard court, wher...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both Rybakina and Zheng are competitive, skilled players capable of extended rallies and break-point battles on hard court. While Rybakina i... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Elena Rybakina |
58%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Elena Rybakina Rybakina holds the stronger hard-court record and serve metrics from training data through 2025-09. Zheng has shown vulnerability to elite s...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over 2.5 Both players possess high hold percentages on hard, reducing straight-set likelihood. Rybakina-Zheng encounters have reached three sets in f... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Elena Rybakina |
55%
Over 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Elena Rybakina This match is predicted based on my knowledge base up to early 2024, as the event date is in 2026. Elena Rybakina's powerful serve and Grand...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 sets Based on their head-to-head record on hard courts (1-1) and the competitive nature of their previous encounters, this match is likely to be... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Elena Rybakina |
58%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Elena Rybakina Based on my training data, Elena Rybakina generally has a slight edge over Zheng Qinwen in head-to-head matchups on hard courts. Rybakina's...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Given the closely matched nature of these players and their potential to trade sets, an over 2.5 sets outcome is slightly more probable. Bot... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Elena Rybakina |
66%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Elena Rybakina Based on training data through September 2025, Rybakina leads the head-to-head 5-1, including a win on hard courts at the 2024 Australian Op...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
66%
Over 1.5 In their last three meetings, two went to three sets, indicating competitive matches. Zheng's consistent baseline game can extend sets, espe... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusElena Rybakina 5/5
Elena Rybakina holds a superior head-to-head record against Zheng Qinwen and has historically performed well at the US Open hard court, wher...
Rybakina holds the stronger hard-court record and serve metrics from training data through 2025-09. Zheng has shown vulnerability to elite s...
This match is predicted based on my knowledge base up to early 2024, as the event date is in 2026. Elena Rybakina's powerful serve and Grand...
Based on my training data, Elena Rybakina generally has a slight edge over Zheng Qinwen in head-to-head matchups on hard courts. Rybakina's...
Based on training data through September 2025, Rybakina leads the head-to-head 5-1, including a win on hard courts at the 2024 Australian Op...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Both Rybakina and Zheng are competitive, skilled players capable of extended rallies and break-point battles on hard court. While Rybakina i...
Both players possess high hold percentages on hard, reducing straight-set likelihood. Rybakina-Zheng encounters have reached three sets in f...
Based on their head-to-head record on hard courts (1-1) and the competitive nature of their previous encounters, this match is likely to be...
Given the closely matched nature of these players and their potential to trade sets, an over 2.5 sets outcome is slightly more probable. Bot...
In their last three meetings, two went to three sets, indicating competitive matches. Zheng's consistent baseline game can extend sets, espe...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Elena Rybakina
Claude Haiku 4.5
Elena Rybakina
Grok 4 Fast
Elena Rybakina
DeepSeek V3
Elena Rybakina
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Elena Rybakina
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
d7d3455fb2cc07e6…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 9 · 15:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39447,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-09T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 09 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Zheng Qinwen",
"home": "Elena Rybakina"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.