Elena RybakinavsNaomi Osaka
NOAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Elena Rybakina 5/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Elena Rybakina |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Elena Rybakina Rybakina has dominated hard-court tennis in recent years with a powerful serve and aggressive baseline game ideally suited to US Open condit...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 US Open women's singles matches are best-of-three sets, capped at 3 total. A 3-set match occurs when the stronger player wins 2–1 or when th... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Elena Rybakina |
62%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Elena Rybakina Rybakina holds a stronger recent hard-court record and better overall consistency than Osaka based on training data through 2024. Osaka has...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 2.5 Best-of-3 format at US Open hard courts often ends in straight sets when one player has the superior serve. Rybakina's power game should lim... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Elena Rybakina |
60%
Over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Elena Rybakina Elena Rybakina has shown remarkable consistency and a dominant power game in recent years, particularly on hard courts. While Naomi Osaka is...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over Both players are Grand Slam champions with formidable hard-court games, characterized by powerful serves and aggressive groundstrokes. Their... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Elena Rybakina |
55%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Elena Rybakina Elena Rybakina is favored due to her consistent performance on hard courts and her strong serve, which is a significant advantage in Grand S...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
2.5 This is projected to be a closely contested match between two powerful players. While Rybakina is the favorite, Osaka has the potential to t... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Elena Rybakina |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Elena Rybakina Training data through 2025-09: Rybakina has a dominant serve and better consistent form on hard courts, while Osaka has shown flashes but re...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Even though Rybakina is favored, Osaka's high-variance game often pushes matches into three sets. In their recent hard-court meetings, two o... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusElena Rybakina 5/5
Rybakina has dominated hard-court tennis in recent years with a powerful serve and aggressive baseline game ideally suited to US Open condit...
Rybakina holds a stronger recent hard-court record and better overall consistency than Osaka based on training data through 2024. Osaka has...
Elena Rybakina has shown remarkable consistency and a dominant power game in recent years, particularly on hard courts. While Naomi Osaka is...
Elena Rybakina is favored due to her consistent performance on hard courts and her strong serve, which is a significant advantage in Grand S...
Training data through 2025-09: Rybakina has a dominant serve and better consistent form on hard courts, while Osaka has shown flashes but re...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
US Open women's singles matches are best-of-three sets, capped at 3 total. A 3-set match occurs when the stronger player wins 2–1 or when th...
Best-of-3 format at US Open hard courts often ends in straight sets when one player has the superior serve. Rybakina's power game should lim...
Both players are Grand Slam champions with formidable hard-court games, characterized by powerful serves and aggressive groundstrokes. Their...
This is projected to be a closely contested match between two powerful players. While Rybakina is the favorite, Osaka has the potential to t...
Even though Rybakina is favored, Osaka's high-variance game often pushes matches into three sets. In their recent hard-court meetings, two o...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Elena Rybakina
Claude Haiku 4.5
Elena Rybakina
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Elena Rybakina
Grok 4 Fast
Elena Rybakina
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Elena Rybakina
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
18ed7764c7968cde…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Sep 7 · 20:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 38959,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-07T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Naomi Osaka",
"home": "Elena Rybakina"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.