Ekaterina OvcharenkovsFiona Crawley
FCAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Ekaterina Ovcharenko 3/5 models |
over 4/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Ekaterina Ovcharenko |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Ekaterina Ovcharenko Ekaterina Ovcharenko is the higher-ranked player and has more consistent WTA tour experience as of my training knowledge. Fiona Crawley is a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 This is a women's singles match at a mid-tier WTA event, likely best-of-three sets. Crawley, despite lower ranking, is a scrappy player who... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Fiona Crawley |
53%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Fiona Crawley Training data through 2025-09. Fiona Crawley has shown stronger recent results on hard courts in US collegiate and ITF events compared to Ek...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Training data through 2025-09. Both players have histories of competitive matches extending to three sets on hard courts. Serve and return m... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Fiona Crawley |
53%
Over 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Fiona Crawley Fiona Crawley, as a highly successful collegiate player in the US, is expected to possess a strong, match-tough game, particularly on hard c...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Over 2.5 sets Given that both players are likely still establishing themselves on the professional tour, a competitive match with potential for momentum s... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Ekaterina Ovcharenko |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Ekaterina Ovcharenko Based on general knowledge, Ekaterina Ovcharenko is typically a stronger player on hard courts than Fiona Crawley. Ovcharenko's game often i...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Given the perceived slight advantage for Ovcharenko and the potential for Crawley to put up a fight, a two-set match is plausible. However,... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Ekaterina Ovcharenko |
70%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Ekaterina Ovcharenko Based on training data through 2025-09, Ekaterina Ovcharenko has a slightly higher baseline level on hard courts, with more consistent resul...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 1.5 Both players are relatively evenly matched, as indicated by the lack of clear bookmaker consensus and the close h2h probabilities. In such c... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusEkaterina Ovcharenko 3/5
Ekaterina Ovcharenko is the higher-ranked player and has more consistent WTA tour experience as of my training knowledge. Fiona Crawley is a...
Training data through 2025-09. Fiona Crawley has shown stronger recent results on hard courts in US collegiate and ITF events compared to Ek...
Fiona Crawley, as a highly successful collegiate player in the US, is expected to possess a strong, match-tough game, particularly on hard c...
Based on general knowledge, Ekaterina Ovcharenko is typically a stronger player on hard courts than Fiona Crawley. Ovcharenko's game often i...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Ekaterina Ovcharenko has a slightly higher baseline level on hard courts, with more consistent resul...
Over / Under
Consensusover 4/10
This is a women's singles match at a mid-tier WTA event, likely best-of-three sets. Crawley, despite lower ranking, is a scrappy player who...
Training data through 2025-09. Both players have histories of competitive matches extending to three sets on hard courts. Serve and return m...
Given that both players are likely still establishing themselves on the professional tour, a competitive match with potential for momentum s...
Given the perceived slight advantage for Ovcharenko and the potential for Crawley to put up a fight, a two-set match is plausible. However,...
Both players are relatively evenly matched, as indicated by the lack of clear bookmaker consensus and the close h2h probabilities. In such c...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
Grok 4 Fast
Fiona Crawley
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Fiona Crawley
DeepSeek V3
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
fb57e992885bc296…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 18:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31144,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Ennoble Care Philly Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Fiona Crawley",
"home": "Ekaterina Ovcharenko"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.