Ekaterina AlexandrovavsKimberly Birrell
KBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Ekaterina Alexandrova 5/5 models |
Under 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Ekaterina Alexandrova |
62%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Ekaterina Alexandrova Alexandrova is a top-100 professional with established hard-court credentials and multiple WTA-level wins; Birrell is a lower-ranked qualifi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Under 2.5 Alexandrova's superior ranking and hard-court pedigree suggest a relatively clean victory in straight sets (2–0). Birrell would need to moun... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
78%
Ekaterina Alexandrova |
65%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Ekaterina Alexandrova Alexandrova holds a significantly higher ranking and better hard-court results than Birrell. Training data through 2025 shows Alexandrova co...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under_2.5 Alexandrova's serve and return stats on hard courts produce straight-set wins against lower-tier players. Birrell lacks the power to force a... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Ekaterina Alexandrova |
65%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Ekaterina Alexandrova Based on my training data through late 2025, Ekaterina Alexandrova is generally a higher-ranked player with a more powerful and aggressive g...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Given Alexandrova's typical dominance over lower-ranked players and her effective hard-court game, a straight-sets victory (Under 2.5 sets)... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Ekaterina Alexandrova |
60%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Ekaterina Alexandrova Ekaterina Alexandrova is a more established player with a higher WTA ranking and a stronger track record on hard courts. While Birrell has s...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.5 Given Alexandrova's strong serve and ability to control matches, she is likely to win in straight sets. However, Birrell is capable of winni... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
68%
Ekaterina Alexandrova |
60%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Ekaterina Alexandrova Alexandrova is a higher-ranked player (top 30) with more experience on hard courts and a powerful serve. Birrell is a qualifier and has less...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over_2.5 Although Alexandrova is favored, Birrell's defensive skills and fighting spirit could push the match to three sets. Alexandrova can be errat... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusEkaterina Alexandrova 5/5
Alexandrova is a top-100 professional with established hard-court credentials and multiple WTA-level wins; Birrell is a lower-ranked qualifi...
Alexandrova holds a significantly higher ranking and better hard-court results than Birrell. Training data through 2025 shows Alexandrova co...
Based on my training data through late 2025, Ekaterina Alexandrova is generally a higher-ranked player with a more powerful and aggressive g...
Ekaterina Alexandrova is a more established player with a higher WTA ranking and a stronger track record on hard courts. While Birrell has s...
Alexandrova is a higher-ranked player (top 30) with more experience on hard courts and a powerful serve. Birrell is a qualifier and has less...
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 2/10
Alexandrova's superior ranking and hard-court pedigree suggest a relatively clean victory in straight sets (2–0). Birrell would need to moun...
Alexandrova's serve and return stats on hard courts produce straight-set wins against lower-tier players. Birrell lacks the power to force a...
Given Alexandrova's typical dominance over lower-ranked players and her effective hard-court game, a straight-sets victory (Under 2.5 sets)...
Given Alexandrova's strong serve and ability to control matches, she is likely to win in straight sets. However, Birrell is capable of winni...
Although Alexandrova is favored, Birrell's defensive skills and fighting spirit could push the match to three sets. Alexandrova can be errat...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Ekaterina Alexandrova
DeepSeek V3
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
186f1bcd430376f7…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 2 · 22:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35134,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-02T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 02 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Kimberly Birrell",
"home": "Ekaterina Alexandrova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.