Dusan LajovicvsDavid Jorda Sanchis
DJAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Dusan Lajovic 5/5 models |
Over 36.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Dusan Lajovic |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Dusan Lajovic Lajovic is an established ATP player with multiple deep runs at Grand Slams and significant hard-court experience, while Sanchis is a lower-...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Lajovic's preference for grinding, extended rallies and his strong defensive baseline game often leads to competitive sets. Sanchis, though... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
78%
Dusan Lajovic |
65%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Dusan Lajovic Dusan Lajovic holds a significantly higher ranking and more extensive hard-court experience than David Jorda Sanchis. Lajovic's serve and ba...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
over_2.5 US Open men's matches are best-of-five, and the rating gap suggests Lajovic will win but not without resistance. Jorda Sanchis can force a s... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Dusan Lajovic |
40%
4 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Dusan Lajovic This match is scheduled for over two years in the future, so recent form and injury information is unavailable. Based on general career prof...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
40%
4 Given Lajovic's higher skill level, a straight-sets victory is plausible. However, hard courts can be less predictable, and Sanchis may capi... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Dusan Lajovic |
55%
David Jorda Sanchis |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Dusan Lajovic Dusan Lajovic is a more established player with a higher career-high ranking and more experience on the ATP tour, suggesting he has a higher...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
David Jorda Sanchis Given Lajovic's likely advantage, this match is expected to be relatively straightforward. However, Sanchis may be able to take a set given... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Dusan Lajovic |
56%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Dusan Lajovic Based on training data up to early 2025, Lajovic has significantly higher career achievements, including ATP titles and consistent top-50 ra...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
56%
Over 3.5 Although Lajovic is favored, Jorda Sanchis is a competitive qualifier who can win at least a set, and early Grand Slam matches often see tig... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusDusan Lajovic 5/5
Lajovic is an established ATP player with multiple deep runs at Grand Slams and significant hard-court experience, while Sanchis is a lower-...
Dusan Lajovic holds a significantly higher ranking and more extensive hard-court experience than David Jorda Sanchis. Lajovic's serve and ba...
This match is scheduled for over two years in the future, so recent form and injury information is unavailable. Based on general career prof...
Dusan Lajovic is a more established player with a higher career-high ranking and more experience on the ATP tour, suggesting he has a higher...
Based on training data up to early 2025, Lajovic has significantly higher career achievements, including ATP titles and consistent top-50 ra...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 36.5 2/10
Lajovic's preference for grinding, extended rallies and his strong defensive baseline game often leads to competitive sets. Sanchis, though...
US Open men's matches are best-of-five, and the rating gap suggests Lajovic will win but not without resistance. Jorda Sanchis can force a s...
Given Lajovic's higher skill level, a straight-sets victory is plausible. However, hard courts can be less predictable, and Sanchis may capi...
Given Lajovic's likely advantage, this match is expected to be relatively straightforward. However, Sanchis may be able to take a set given...
Although Lajovic is favored, Jorda Sanchis is a competitive qualifier who can win at least a set, and early Grand Slam matches often see tig...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Dusan Lajovic
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Dusan Lajovic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Dusan Lajovic
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Dusan Lajovic
DeepSeek V3
Dusan Lajovic
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a2b7b1243e174c67…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 17:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31146,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "David Jorda Sanchis",
"home": "Dusan Lajovic"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.