Donna VekicvsTalia Gibson
TGAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Donna Vekic 5/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Donna Vekic |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Donna Vekic Donna Vekic is an established WTA player with multiple Grand Slam appearances and solid hard-court credentials, while Talia Gibson is a lowe...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 This is a US Open women's singles match, which are best-of-three sets. A 2-0 straight-set win by the favorite is common but not dominant, es... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
78%
Donna Vekic |
65%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Donna Vekic Vekic holds far more experience on hard courts and at Grand Slam level than Gibson. Training data through 2025-09 shows Vekic consistently r...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under 2.5 Vekic's serve and experience should limit the match to straight sets. Gibson lacks the consistency to force a deciding set against a top-tie... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Donna Vekic |
60%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Donna Vekic Donna Vekic is a more experienced and higher-ranked player with a strong record on hard courts, making her the clear favorite against Talia...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Vekic's expected advantage, a straight-sets victory is the most probable outcome for this match. However, Gibson possesses enough prof... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Donna Vekic |
60%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Donna Vekic Donna Vekic is a more experienced player on the WTA tour with a higher career ranking and more significant tournament wins, especially on ha...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.5 Given Vekic's experience and Gibson's relative inexperience, it's likely Vekic will win in straight sets. However, Gibson is capable of taki... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
75%
Donna Vekic |
60%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Donna Vekic Donna Vekic, a seasoned WTA player with experience on hard courts, faces a qualifier in Talia Gibson who is less accustomed to Grand Slam ma...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Vekic is expected to win dominantly, possibly in straight sets, but Gibson's fighting spirit could extend a set to a tiebreak. Both players... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusDonna Vekic 5/5
Donna Vekic is an established WTA player with multiple Grand Slam appearances and solid hard-court credentials, while Talia Gibson is a lowe...
Vekic holds far more experience on hard courts and at Grand Slam level than Gibson. Training data through 2025-09 shows Vekic consistently r...
Donna Vekic is a more experienced and higher-ranked player with a strong record on hard courts, making her the clear favorite against Talia...
Donna Vekic is a more experienced player on the WTA tour with a higher career ranking and more significant tournament wins, especially on ha...
Donna Vekic, a seasoned WTA player with experience on hard courts, faces a qualifier in Talia Gibson who is less accustomed to Grand Slam ma...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
This is a US Open women's singles match, which are best-of-three sets. A 2-0 straight-set win by the favorite is common but not dominant, es...
Vekic's serve and experience should limit the match to straight sets. Gibson lacks the consistency to force a deciding set against a top-tie...
Given Vekic's expected advantage, a straight-sets victory is the most probable outcome for this match. However, Gibson possesses enough prof...
Given Vekic's experience and Gibson's relative inexperience, it's likely Vekic will win in straight sets. However, Gibson is capable of taki...
Vekic is expected to win dominantly, possibly in straight sets, but Gibson's fighting spirit could extend a set to a tiebreak. Both players...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Donna Vekic
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Donna Vekic
DeepSeek V3
Donna Vekic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Donna Vekic
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Donna Vekic
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
4c4882240b86c873…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 30 · 15:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31786,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Talia Gibson",
"home": "Donna Vekic"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.