Diane ParryvsClara Tauson
CTAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Diane Parry 3/5 models |
Over 1.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Diane Parry |
64%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Diane Parry Diane Parry is the home favorite at the Abierto GNP Seguros (Mexico, hard court) and benefits from familiarity with the venue and surface. C...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
64%
Over 1.5 Both Parry and Tauson are solid mid-level hard-court players capable of holding serve and creating competitive sets. A straight-set win is p... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
Clara Tauson |
62%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Clara Tauson Clara Tauson holds a higher ranking and stronger recent results on hard courts entering 2026. Diane Parry has shown inconsistency against to...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 2.5 Tauson's serve and return stats suggest she can close matches in straight sets on hard courts. Parry has struggled to force deciders against... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Clara Tauson |
52%
Over 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Clara Tauson Based on my training data up to my last update, Clara Tauson generally possesses a more aggressive game with powerful groundstrokes and a st...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 Sets While Tauson is favored, she can be inconsistent, leading to dropped sets even in winning matches. Diane Parry is a tenacious competitor cap... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Diane Parry |
62%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Diane Parry Diane Parry is slightly favored due to her generally better performance on hard courts and potentially superior recent form leading into thi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
2.5 This matchup is expected to be closely contested. Both players are capable of winning sets, and given their hard court abilities, it's likel... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Diane Parry |
70%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Diane Parry Training data through 2025-09: Parry has shown solid form on hard courts, while Tauson has been inconsistent due to injury concerns. Parry's...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 1.5 Both players have competitive histories and tend to push matches to three sets, especially on hard courts. With Parry's grinding style and T... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusDiane Parry 3/5
Diane Parry is the home favorite at the Abierto GNP Seguros (Mexico, hard court) and benefits from familiarity with the venue and surface. C...
Clara Tauson holds a higher ranking and stronger recent results on hard courts entering 2026. Diane Parry has shown inconsistency against to...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Clara Tauson generally possesses a more aggressive game with powerful groundstrokes and a st...
Diane Parry is slightly favored due to her generally better performance on hard courts and potentially superior recent form leading into thi...
Training data through 2025-09: Parry has shown solid form on hard courts, while Tauson has been inconsistent due to injury concerns. Parry's...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 1.5 2/10
Both Parry and Tauson are solid mid-level hard-court players capable of holding serve and creating competitive sets. A straight-set win is p...
Tauson's serve and return stats suggest she can close matches in straight sets on hard courts. Parry has struggled to force deciders against...
While Tauson is favored, she can be inconsistent, leading to dropped sets even in winning matches. Diane Parry is a tenacious competitor cap...
This matchup is expected to be closely contested. Both players are capable of winning sets, and given their hard court abilities, it's likel...
Both players have competitive histories and tend to push matches to three sets, especially on hard courts. With Parry's grinding style and T...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Clara Tauson
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Clara Tauson
DeepSeek V3
Diane Parry
Claude Haiku 4.5
Diane Parry
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Diane Parry
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
5438732abbdff722…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Aug 28 · 01:45 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31712,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Abierto GNP Seguros",
"starts_at": "2026-08-28T01:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 28 Aug 2026 01:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Clara Tauson",
"home": "Diane Parry"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.