Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 4–3
Detroit Tigers logo

Detroit TigersvsChicago White Sox

Chicago White Sox logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final4–3 Locked 28picks · 16 graded
Recap Consensus called it

Detroit Tigers 4–3 Chicago White Sox

5 of 7 AIs leaned Detroit Tigers — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Detroit Tigers 5/7
Correct calls
5/7
Final
4–3

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
Detroit Tigers -1.5 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Detroit Tigers -1.5 L

The Tigers at home should be slight favorites on the run line. A -1.5 spread reflects modest home-field advantage and general competitive pa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 48% Detroit Tigers -1.5 L

Tarik Skubal gives Detroit a tangible start-to-finish advantage, but an MLB runline (-1.5) is tighter because even a strong starter can leav...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Chicago White Sox L

The White Sox's superior performance and recent form suggest they are likely to win by at least one run, covering the spread.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% Detroit Tigers -1.5 L

Detroit holds a clear talent edge and home advantage expected to produce a multi-run victory. Spread value leans toward the stronger Tigers...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Chicago White Sox +1.5 W

Baseball games, particularly divisional matchups, are frequently decided by one run. Even if the Tigers secure a victory, a +1.5 run line fo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 50% Chicago White Sox

Given the lack of specific information about starting pitchers, bullpens, or recent team performance, predicting the spread is highly specul...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 50% Detroit Tigers -1.5 L

The Tigers are expected to win but not necessarily by multiple runs. A one-run margin is common in MLB, making the -1.5 spread risky.

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Detroit Tigers 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Detroit Tigers W

The Tigers are favored as the home team in early-season June baseball. Without access to live 2026 rosters, injuries, or real-time form data...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Detroit Tigers W

Detroit gets a clear pitching edge in this matchup: Tarik Skubal (2.81 ERA, 0.98 WHIP in previews) is a higher-quality, more consistent star...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Chicago White Sox L

The Chicago White Sox have a stronger overall record and have been performing better recently compared to the Detroit Tigers. Their recent f...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 62% Detroit Tigers W

Detroit Tigers have shown stronger overall roster construction and pitching depth than the White Sox through 2025. Head-to-head trends favor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Detroit Tigers W

Based on historical trends and general MLB dynamics, the home team usually holds a slight edge in closely matched division games. Without sp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Chicago White Sox L

Based on training data, the Chicago White Sox have historically held a slight edge over the Detroit Tigers. While specific recent form is no...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Detroit Tigers W

Based on training knowledge through 2025, the Tigers have generally been a slightly stronger team than the White Sox in recent years. Home f...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Detroit Tigers 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 53% Under 4.5

First-five-inning totals in MLB typically skew toward the Under (~4.3 runs combined on average) because starting pitchers are fresh and stri...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% Detroit Tigers

Skubal has been strong in early-to-middle outings and is more likely to hold the White Sox through five innings than Fedde is to do the same...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago White Sox

The White Sox's consistent performance in the early innings suggests they are likely to lead after the first five innings.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Detroit Tigers

Tigers starting pitching typically keeps early innings close or in their favor against weaker lineups like the White Sox. Home field provide...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 38% Draw

With potentially evenly matched starting pitchers and historically inconsistent offenses from both teams, a low-scoring affair through the f...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% Chicago White Sox

The first five innings often reflect the starting pitcher matchup and early game momentum. Without specific data, we defer to the general hi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Detroit Tigers

Home teams tend to perform better in early innings, and Detroit's likely starting pitcher should give them an edge. The White Sox bullpen mi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Over 8.5

MLB Friday night games in mid-June typically fall in the 8–9 run range on average. Without pitcher matchups or ballpark-specific data for 20...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% under W

The published game total around previews is 8; with Skubal (quality lefty) facing Fedde (inconsistent) and cool, mostly-clear evening weathe...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over W

Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities, and the game is expected to be competitive, leading to a higher likelihood of a total...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% over

White Sox pitching has been weak allowing high run totals while Tigers offense provides consistent scoring. Historical games between these c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Under 8.5 W

Historically, games involving both the Tigers and White Sox often feature struggling offenses and pitcher-friendly conditions, especially at...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% over

Without specific pitching matchups or recent offensive/defensive performances, it's difficult to make a strong call. However, general baseba...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% over 8.5

Both teams have had mid-tier offenses in 2025, but the pitching matchups are uncertain. The game is in June which generally favors offense d...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Detroit Tigers

62
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Detroit Tigers

62
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Chicago White Sox

60
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Detroit Tigers

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Detroit Tigers

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Detroit Tigers

52
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Chicago White Sox

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 9d180300d21ff762…
Kickoff
Fri, Jun 19 · 22:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 3785,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-19T22:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Fri, 19 Jun 2026 22:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Chicago White Sox",
        "home": "Detroit Tigers"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-16T05:56:22+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →