Despina PapamichailvsLaura Pigossi
LPYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Under 2.5 2/10 models |
Despina Papamichail 3/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
55%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Despina Papamichail |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 This is a first-round or early-round US Open match between two mid-tier players (not top-10 seeds). Both Papamichail and Pigossi have shown...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Despina Papamichail Papamichail is the higher-ranked player and has more consistent hard-court results in my training data (through Sept 2025). Pigossi is a cap... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
under_2.5 |
58%
Despina Papamichail |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_2.5 Both players lack elite return games so straight-sets outcomes are common in early US Open rounds. Fatigue from qualifying or travel is mini...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Despina Papamichail Papamichail holds a modest edge on hard courts from prior seasons and is the higher-ranked player entering 2026. Pigossi has shown inconsist... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Over 2.5 Sets |
58%
Laura Pigossi |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 2.5 Sets Given that both players are known for their grinding styles and lack dominant weapons on hard courts, a lengthy and competitive match is ant...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Laura Pigossi This match is scheduled for a future date (2026), so predictions are based on my training data up to late 2023/early 2024. Laura Pigossi gen... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Under 2.5 |
75%
Laura Pigossi |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Given Laura Pigossi's strong form and Despina Papamichail's recent struggles, a straight-sets victory for Pigossi seems likely. Pigossi's ab...
2 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Laura Pigossi Laura Pigossi is in better recent form on hard courts, holding a significantly stronger record for the 2026 season and winning 6 of her last...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Under 2.5 |
65%
Despina Papamichail |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 2.5 Given Papamichail's superior hard-court credentials and the likelihood of a straightforward win in straight sets, under 2.5 sets appears the...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Despina Papamichail Based on overall career performance, Papamichail has a higher WTA ranking and more experience at this level compared to Pigossi, who has str... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 2/10
This is a first-round or early-round US Open match between two mid-tier players (not top-10 seeds). Both Papamichail and Pigossi have shown...
Both players lack elite return games so straight-sets outcomes are common in early US Open rounds. Fatigue from qualifying or travel is mini...
Given that both players are known for their grinding styles and lack dominant weapons on hard courts, a lengthy and competitive match is ant...
Given Laura Pigossi's strong form and Despina Papamichail's recent struggles, a straight-sets victory for Pigossi seems likely. Pigossi's ab...
Given Papamichail's superior hard-court credentials and the likelihood of a straightforward win in straight sets, under 2.5 sets appears the...
Match winner
ConsensusDespina Papamichail 3/5
Papamichail is the higher-ranked player and has more consistent hard-court results in my training data (through Sept 2025). Pigossi is a cap...
Papamichail holds a modest edge on hard courts from prior seasons and is the higher-ranked player entering 2026. Pigossi has shown inconsist...
This match is scheduled for a future date (2026), so predictions are based on my training data up to late 2023/early 2024. Laura Pigossi gen...
Laura Pigossi is in better recent form on hard courts, holding a significantly stronger record for the 2026 season and winning 6 of her last...
Based on overall career performance, Papamichail has a higher WTA ranking and more experience at this level compared to Pigossi, who has str...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Laura Pigossi
DeepSeek V3
Despina Papamichail
Claude Haiku 4.5
Despina Papamichail
Grok 4 Fast
Despina Papamichail
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Laura Pigossi
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
8e650357f2140550…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 21:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30815,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T21:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 21:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Laura Pigossi",
"home": "Despina Papamichail"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.