Desirae KrawczykvsAnna-Lena Friedsam
AFYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Anna-Lena Friedsam 3/4 models |
over 3/8 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Anna-Lena Friedsam |
62%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Anna-Lena Friedsam Training data through 2023. Anna-Lena Friedsam holds a slight edge in recent hard-court singles results against lower-ranked opponents compa...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under Training data through 2023. Both players lack elite serve power, increasing the chance of one player dominating early and closing in straigh... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Anna-Lena Friedsam |
65%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Anna-Lena Friedsam Based on my training data up to 2025-09, Anna-Lena Friedsam is primarily a singles player with a significantly more accomplished career in t...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under_2.5 Given Anna-Lena Friedsam's stronger singles background, she is expected to secure a straight-sets victory against Desirae Krawczyk. While Kr... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Desirae Krawczyk |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Desirae Krawczyk Both players are primarily doubles specialists, but Krawczyk has a slightly better singles record and has shown more consistent form in rece...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Given that both players are primarily doubles specialists, their singles matches can be unpredictable and often go to three sets. This sugge... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Anna-Lena Friedsam |
55%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Anna-Lena Friedsam Both players are primarily doubles specialists — Krawczyk is an elite doubles player (multiple Grand Slam mixed/women's doubles titles) whil...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 With both players being doubles-first competitors facing a rare singles setting, matches often feature service holds but also erratic return... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAnna-Lena Friedsam 3/4
Training data through 2023. Anna-Lena Friedsam holds a slight edge in recent hard-court singles results against lower-ranked opponents compa...
Based on my training data up to 2025-09, Anna-Lena Friedsam is primarily a singles player with a significantly more accomplished career in t...
Both players are primarily doubles specialists, but Krawczyk has a slightly better singles record and has shown more consistent form in rece...
Both players are primarily doubles specialists — Krawczyk is an elite doubles player (multiple Grand Slam mixed/women's doubles titles) whil...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/8
Training data through 2023. Both players lack elite serve power, increasing the chance of one player dominating early and closing in straigh...
Given Anna-Lena Friedsam's stronger singles background, she is expected to secure a straight-sets victory against Desirae Krawczyk. While Kr...
Given that both players are primarily doubles specialists, their singles matches can be unpredictable and often go to three sets. This sugge...
With both players being doubles-first competitors facing a rare singles setting, matches often feature service holds but also erratic return...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Desirae Krawczyk
DeepSeek V3
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Grok 4 Fast
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
3575cef61c671dce…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 19 · 03:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 44836,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Singapore Tennis Open presented by BNP Paribas",
"starts_at": "2026-09-19T03:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 19 Sep 2026 03:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Anna-Lena Friedsam",
"home": "Desirae Krawczyk"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.