Denis ShapovalovvsMiomir Kecmanovic
MKAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Denis Shapovalov 5/5 models |
under_3.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Denis Shapovalov |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Denis Shapovalov Shapovalov has historically held a significant edge over Kecmanovic in head-to-head play and possesses superior serve strength on hard court...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are capable of winning sets on hard court, and Kecmanovic's baseline resilience often forces opponents into extended rallies. S... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
78%
Denis Shapovalov |
65%
under_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Denis Shapovalov Shapovalov holds a clear talent and ranking edge over Kecmanovic and has historically dominated on hard courts. Their head-to-head favors th...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under_3.5 Shapovalov is expected to control rallies and break serve efficiently on this surface. Kecmanovic rarely pushes matches to five sets against... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Denis Shapovalov |
70%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Denis Shapovalov Based on my training data through my last update, Denis Shapovalov generally possesses a higher offensive ceiling and a more impactful serve...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 3.5 Sets Considering both players' profiles from my training data, a straight-sets victory for either Denis Shapovalov or Miomir Kecmanovic appears u... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Denis Shapovalov |
55%
Miomir Kecmanovic |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Denis Shapovalov Denis Shapovalov, despite being ranked lower, has a stronger career record on hard courts and a more aggressive game style suited for Grand...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Miomir Kecmanovic This is projected to be a close match, with Shapovalov having a slight edge. However, Kecmanovic is a resilient player who can take sets. A... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Denis Shapovalov |
60%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Denis Shapovalov Training data through 2025-09: Shapovalov has a higher ceiling and more explosive game, especially on hard courts where he has had deeper Gr...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 Given Shapovalov's tendency for five-set thrillers and Kecmanovic's gritty play, this match is likely to go the distance. Both players have... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusDenis Shapovalov 5/5
Shapovalov has historically held a significant edge over Kecmanovic in head-to-head play and possesses superior serve strength on hard court...
Shapovalov holds a clear talent and ranking edge over Kecmanovic and has historically dominated on hard courts. Their head-to-head favors th...
Based on my training data through my last update, Denis Shapovalov generally possesses a higher offensive ceiling and a more impactful serve...
Denis Shapovalov, despite being ranked lower, has a stronger career record on hard courts and a more aggressive game style suited for Grand...
Training data through 2025-09: Shapovalov has a higher ceiling and more explosive game, especially on hard courts where he has had deeper Gr...
Over / Under
Consensusunder_3.5 1/10
Both players are capable of winning sets on hard court, and Kecmanovic's baseline resilience often forces opponents into extended rallies. S...
Shapovalov is expected to control rallies and break serve efficiently on this surface. Kecmanovic rarely pushes matches to five sets against...
Considering both players' profiles from my training data, a straight-sets victory for either Denis Shapovalov or Miomir Kecmanovic appears u...
This is projected to be a close match, with Shapovalov having a slight edge. However, Kecmanovic is a resilient player who can take sets. A...
Given Shapovalov's tendency for five-set thrillers and Kecmanovic's gritty play, this match is likely to go the distance. Both players have...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Denis Shapovalov
Claude Haiku 4.5
Denis Shapovalov
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Denis Shapovalov
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Denis Shapovalov
DeepSeek V3
Denis Shapovalov
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
75550b5c0240d7ae…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 30 · 19:50 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31732,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Miomir Kecmanovic",
"home": "Denis Shapovalov"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.