Darja VidmanovavsCristina Bucsa
CBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Cristina Bucsa 3/5 models |
under 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Cristina Bucsa |
58%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Cristina Bucsa Both players are mid-tier WTA competitors with limited recent public profile in my training data (through 2025-09). Cristina Bucsa has shown...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 Both Vidmanova and Bucsa are lower-ranked players with similar competitive levels, suggesting a competitive match likely to go at least two... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Cristina Bucsa |
62%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Cristina Bucsa Cristina Bucsa holds the stronger career pedigree and surface experience on hard courts compared to Darja Vidmanova. The 2026 match date fal...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under Both players exhibit baseline-oriented games that often produce straight-sets outcomes on outdoor hard courts. Limited head-to-head data and... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
68%
Cristina Bucsa |
58%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Cristina Bucsa Based on my training data up to my last update, Cristina Bucsa is generally a more established player on the WTA tour with higher experience...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Bucsa's likely superior skill level based on general career performance, a straight-sets victory is a probable outcome. While Vidmanov... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Darja Vidmanova |
60%
Cristina Bucsa |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Darja Vidmanova Based on training data up to 2025, Darja Vidmanova is generally favored due to a slightly higher win rate in comparable hard court tournamen...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Cristina Bucsa Given Vidmanova's slight edge in head-to-head performance and serve strength, it's more probable that she will win in straight sets. This al... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Darja Vidmanova |
55%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Darja Vidmanova Based on training data through 2025-09, Vidmanova has shown stronger recent form on hard courts, with a solid first-serve percentage and agg...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Given the competitive nature of the matchup and similar playing styles, a three-set match is likely. Both players have shown resilience in p... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusCristina Bucsa 3/5
Both players are mid-tier WTA competitors with limited recent public profile in my training data (through 2025-09). Cristina Bucsa has shown...
Cristina Bucsa holds the stronger career pedigree and surface experience on hard courts compared to Darja Vidmanova. The 2026 match date fal...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Cristina Bucsa is generally a more established player on the WTA tour with higher experience...
Based on training data up to 2025, Darja Vidmanova is generally favored due to a slightly higher win rate in comparable hard court tournamen...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Vidmanova has shown stronger recent form on hard courts, with a solid first-serve percentage and agg...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2/10
Both Vidmanova and Bucsa are lower-ranked players with similar competitive levels, suggesting a competitive match likely to go at least two...
Both players exhibit baseline-oriented games that often produce straight-sets outcomes on outdoor hard courts. Limited head-to-head data and...
Given Bucsa's likely superior skill level based on general career performance, a straight-sets victory is a probable outcome. While Vidmanov...
Given Vidmanova's slight edge in head-to-head performance and serve strength, it's more probable that she will win in straight sets. This al...
Given the competitive nature of the matchup and similar playing styles, a three-set match is likely. Both players have shown resilience in p...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Cristina Bucsa
Claude Haiku 4.5
Cristina Bucsa
DeepSeek V3
Darja Vidmanova
Grok 4 Fast
Cristina Bucsa
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Darja Vidmanova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
b4f89deb87f9d598…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 21:35 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31174,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Abierto GNP Seguros",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Cristina Bucsa",
"home": "Darja Vidmanova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.