Darja VidmanovavsCaroline Werner
CWYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Darja Vidmanova 5/5 models |
Over 2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Darja Vidmanova |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Darja Vidmanova Both players are lower-ranked WTA competitors; Vidmanova has marginally stronger recent form on hard courts and serves with slightly more co...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are similarly ranked mid-tier professionals without dominant serve games, suggesting they will break serve multiple times and e... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
Darja Vidmanova |
62%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Darja Vidmanova Both players are low-ranked and lack significant public profiles in training data through 2025. Vidmanova receives the slight edge as the de...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 2.5 Lower-level WTA/ITF matches between lesser-known players frequently end in straight sets. Limited stamina data and probable surface familiar... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
82%
Darja Vidmanova |
68%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Darja Vidmanova Based on available training data up to my last update, Darja Vidmanova is a professional player with a known history on the WTA and ITF tour...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
under_2.5 Given Darja Vidmanova's expected advantage, she is likely to secure a victory in straight sets. While an unknown opponent could potentially... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Darja Vidmanova |
60%
Caroline Werner |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Darja Vidmanova Based on training data, Darja Vidmanova has a stronger recent performance record and a higher perceived skill level on hard courts, which is...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Caroline Werner Given Darja Vidmanova is favored to win, and both players have shown moderate consistency, a two-set victory for Vidmanova is the most likel... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Darja Vidmanova |
55%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Darja Vidmanova Training data through 2025-09: Vidmanova has shown stronger recent form on hard courts, with a more consistent serve and better return stats...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 Both players are solid but not dominant on hard courts, and their head-to-head (from memory) has often gone to straight sets. Vidmanova's se... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusDarja Vidmanova 5/5
Both players are lower-ranked WTA competitors; Vidmanova has marginally stronger recent form on hard courts and serves with slightly more co...
Both players are low-ranked and lack significant public profiles in training data through 2025. Vidmanova receives the slight edge as the de...
Based on available training data up to my last update, Darja Vidmanova is a professional player with a known history on the WTA and ITF tour...
Based on training data, Darja Vidmanova has a stronger recent performance record and a higher perceived skill level on hard courts, which is...
Training data through 2025-09: Vidmanova has shown stronger recent form on hard courts, with a more consistent serve and better return stats...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 1/10
Both players are similarly ranked mid-tier professionals without dominant serve games, suggesting they will break serve multiple times and e...
Lower-level WTA/ITF matches between lesser-known players frequently end in straight sets. Limited stamina data and probable surface familiar...
Given Darja Vidmanova's expected advantage, she is likely to secure a victory in straight sets. While an unknown opponent could potentially...
Given Darja Vidmanova is favored to win, and both players have shown moderate consistency, a two-set victory for Vidmanova is the most likel...
Both players are solid but not dominant on hard courts, and their head-to-head (from memory) has often gone to straight sets. Vidmanova's se...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Darja Vidmanova
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Darja Vidmanova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Darja Vidmanova
DeepSeek V3
Darja Vidmanova
Grok 4 Fast
Darja Vidmanova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
e849f58bc4119df1…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 22 · 19:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 29770,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Abierto GNP Seguros",
"starts_at": "2026-08-22T19:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 22 Aug 2026 19:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Caroline Werner",
"home": "Darja Vidmanova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.