Daniil GlinkavsPedro Martinez
PMYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 3.5 2/10 models |
Daniil Glinka 3/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
55%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Daniil Glinka |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 US Open is best-of-five for men's singles (or best-of-three for women's singles; context unclear but I assume men's given the match ID and v...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Daniil Glinka Both players are relatively obscure in my training data (cutoff 2025-09), suggesting they are lower-ranked or emerging talents. Without live... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
over 2.5 |
68%
Pedro Martinez |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over 2.5 Training data through 2024 shows Martinez rarely wins in straight sets against even lower-ranked opponents on hard courts. Glinka's limited...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Pedro Martinez Pedro Martinez holds a higher career ranking and more experience on outdoor hard courts than Daniil Glinka based on training data through 20... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Over 3.5 |
65%
Pedro Martinez |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 3.5 Based on player profiles from training data through my last update, Pedro Martinez is primarily a clay-court specialist, which levels the pl...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Pedro Martinez Based on player profiles from training data through my last update, Pedro Martinez is a higher-ranked and more experienced player. While his... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
2.5 |
60%
Daniil Glinka |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
2.5 Given the slight favorite status of Daniil Glinka and the generally competitive nature of matches involving players at this level, there is...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Daniil Glinka Daniil Glinka is a more established player on the ATP tour with a higher career-high ranking than Pedro Martinez. Based on general knowledge... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Over 3.5 |
60%
Daniil Glinka |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 3.5 Both players are prone to inconsistent stretches, and a competitive first-round match is likely. With no overwhelming favorite, a four or fi...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Daniil Glinka Training data through 2025-09; Glinka is a promising young player with strong recent hard-court form, while Martinez has been less consisten... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 3.5 2/10
US Open is best-of-five for men's singles (or best-of-three for women's singles; context unclear but I assume men's given the match ID and v...
Training data through 2024 shows Martinez rarely wins in straight sets against even lower-ranked opponents on hard courts. Glinka's limited...
Based on player profiles from training data through my last update, Pedro Martinez is primarily a clay-court specialist, which levels the pl...
Given the slight favorite status of Daniil Glinka and the generally competitive nature of matches involving players at this level, there is...
Both players are prone to inconsistent stretches, and a competitive first-round match is likely. With no overwhelming favorite, a four or fi...
Match winner
ConsensusDaniil Glinka 3/5
Both players are relatively obscure in my training data (cutoff 2025-09), suggesting they are lower-ranked or emerging talents. Without live...
Pedro Martinez holds a higher career ranking and more experience on outdoor hard courts than Daniil Glinka based on training data through 20...
Based on player profiles from training data through my last update, Pedro Martinez is a higher-ranked and more experienced player. While his...
Daniil Glinka is a more established player on the ATP tour with a higher career-high ranking than Pedro Martinez. Based on general knowledge...
Training data through 2025-09; Glinka is a promising young player with strong recent hard-court form, while Martinez has been less consisten...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Pedro Martinez
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Pedro Martinez
Claude Haiku 4.5
Daniil Glinka
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Daniil Glinka
DeepSeek V3
Daniil Glinka
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
ba95a527ffb6a28b…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Aug 25 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30797,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-25T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 25 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Pedro Martinez",
"home": "Daniil Glinka"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.