Daniel AltmaiervsZachary Svajda
ZSAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Daniel Altmaier 3/5 models |
Over 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Daniel Altmaier |
62%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Daniel Altmaier Altmaier is the higher-ranked player with superior hard-court pedigree and more consistent tour-level experience; Svajda is a rising America...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 US Open first or early-round hard-court matches typically produce competitive rallies and multiple set attempts; neither player is a dominan... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Daniel Altmaier |
67%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Daniel Altmaier Altmaier holds a higher ranking and more consistent hard-court results in recent seasons compared to Svajda. The match is on outdoor hard co...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
67%
over 2.5 Both players possess solid serves that should limit quick breaks on hard courts. Best-of-five format at a major increases likelihood of four... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Zachary Svajda |
38%
4 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Zachary Svajda Based on training data up to my last update, Zachary Svajda's aggressive playstyle and comfort on hard courts give him a slight edge in this...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
38%
4 sets Given the perceived competitive balance and both players' ability to extend rallies, a straight-sets victory for either player is less likel... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Altmaier |
60%
Over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Altmaier Based on training data through September 2025, Daniel Altmaier has a more established presence and higher win rate in Grand Slam tournaments...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over Given the potential for a competitive match that could go to 4 or 5 sets, the total number of games is likely to exceed the implied line. Bo... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Daniel Altmaier |
55%
over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Daniel Altmaier Based on my training data through early 2025, Daniel Altmaier has more experience at Grand Slam level and a higher ranking, giving him an ed...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 3.5 Given that this is a Grand Slam best-of-five match, it is common for early-round matches to go four sets, especially when a lower-ranked pla... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusDaniel Altmaier 3/5
Altmaier is the higher-ranked player with superior hard-court pedigree and more consistent tour-level experience; Svajda is a rising America...
Altmaier holds a higher ranking and more consistent hard-court results in recent seasons compared to Svajda. The match is on outdoor hard co...
Based on training data up to my last update, Zachary Svajda's aggressive playstyle and comfort on hard courts give him a slight edge in this...
Based on training data through September 2025, Daniel Altmaier has a more established presence and higher win rate in Grand Slam tournaments...
Based on my training data through early 2025, Daniel Altmaier has more experience at Grand Slam level and a higher ranking, giving him an ed...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 1/10
US Open first or early-round hard-court matches typically produce competitive rallies and multiple set attempts; neither player is a dominan...
Both players possess solid serves that should limit quick breaks on hard courts. Best-of-five format at a major increases likelihood of four...
Given the perceived competitive balance and both players' ability to extend rallies, a straight-sets victory for either player is less likel...
Given the potential for a competitive match that could go to 4 or 5 sets, the total number of games is likely to exceed the implied line. Bo...
Given that this is a Grand Slam best-of-five match, it is common for early-round matches to go four sets, especially when a lower-ranked pla...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Altmaier
Grok 4 Fast
Daniel Altmaier
DeepSeek V3
Daniel Altmaier
Claude Haiku 4.5
Daniel Altmaier
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Zachary Svajda
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
03218fd018b0c0e9…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 2 · 16:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31743,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Zachary Svajda",
"home": "Daniel Altmaier"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.