Dane SweenyvsLuciano Darderi
LDAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Luciano Darderi 3/5 models |
under 3.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Dane Sweeny |
54%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Dane Sweeny Both players are lower-ranked ATP competitors with limited recent public profile data available in my training knowledge (cutoff 2025-09). S...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Over 2.5 US Open main-draw matches are best-of-3 sets, capping the maximum at 3. Given both players are mid-tier ATP (not household names with domina... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
Luciano Darderi |
61%
under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Luciano Darderi Luciano Darderi holds a significantly higher ranking and stronger recent results on hard courts than Dane Sweeny based on training data thro...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under 3.5 Best-of-five format at the US Open typically ends in three or four sets for a clear favorite. Darderi's serve and movement on hard should li... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
68%
Dane Sweeny |
70%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Dane Sweeny Dane Sweeny holds a significant advantage on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open, given his primary training and playing exper...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 3.5 Sets While Dane Sweeny is favored due to the surface, Luciano Darderi is a competitive player capable of challenging and taking a set in a best-o... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Luciano Darderi |
58%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Luciano Darderi Luciano Darderi is the higher-ranked player and has demonstrated better form on hard courts this season. While Dane Sweeny has shown promise...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
2.5 This matchup is expected to be closely contested, with both players capable of taking sets. Darderi's slight advantage suggests he might win...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Luciano Darderi |
55%
under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Luciano Darderi Training data through 2025-09. Darderi is a higher-ranked ATP player with more experience on hard courts and in Grand Slams. Sweeny, an Aust...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under 3.5 Given the ranking disparity, Darderi is expected to win in straight sets or in four sets. Sweeny may push but is likely to lose in three or... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusLuciano Darderi 3/5
Both players are lower-ranked ATP competitors with limited recent public profile data available in my training knowledge (cutoff 2025-09). S...
Luciano Darderi holds a significantly higher ranking and stronger recent results on hard courts than Dane Sweeny based on training data thro...
Dane Sweeny holds a significant advantage on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open, given his primary training and playing exper...
Luciano Darderi is the higher-ranked player and has demonstrated better form on hard courts this season. While Dane Sweeny has shown promise...
Training data through 2025-09. Darderi is a higher-ranked ATP player with more experience on hard courts and in Grand Slams. Sweeny, an Aust...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 3.5 2/10
US Open main-draw matches are best-of-3 sets, capping the maximum at 3. Given both players are mid-tier ATP (not household names with domina...
Best-of-five format at the US Open typically ends in three or four sets for a clear favorite. Darderi's serve and movement on hard should li...
While Dane Sweeny is favored due to the surface, Luciano Darderi is a competitive player capable of challenging and taking a set in a best-o...
This matchup is expected to be closely contested, with both players capable of taking sets. Darderi's slight advantage suggests he might win...
Given the ranking disparity, Darderi is expected to win in straight sets or in four sets. Sweeny may push but is likely to lose in three or...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Luciano Darderi
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Dane Sweeny
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Luciano Darderi
DeepSeek V3
Luciano Darderi
Claude Haiku 4.5
Dane Sweeny
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
3626c65ee4ff8f59…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 5 · 19:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 36165,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-05T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 05 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Luciano Darderi",
"home": "Dane Sweeny"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.