Cristina BucsavsSara Bejlek
SBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Cristina Bucsa 5/5 models |
over_2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Cristina Bucsa |
58%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Cristina Bucsa Bucsa is a Spanish hard-court specialist with stronger baseline consistency and superior ranking depth; Bejlek is a talented but less establ...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 Both players are capable of taking a set in early-round play, and Bejlek has shown resilience in lower-tier competitions. Bucsa is favored b... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Cristina Bucsa |
52%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Cristina Bucsa Cristina Bucsa holds the higher ranking and more consistent results on hard courts entering 2026. Sara Bejlek remains early in her developme...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over_2.5 Both players exhibit solid but not dominant serve games on hard courts, favoring three-set matches. Head-to-head patterns from prior seasons... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Cristina Bucsa |
55%
Over 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Cristina Bucsa Cristina Bucsa's greater experience on hard courts and general consistency typically give her an edge against rising talents. This predictio...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 sets A competitive encounter is expected, and Bejlek's potential to challenge for a set, even if Bucsa ultimately wins, makes a three-set match p... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Cristina Bucsa |
60%
Sara Bejlek |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Cristina Bucsa Cristina Bucsa is the more experienced player on the hard court surface, which is the surface for the US Open. While Sara Bejlek has shown f...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Sara Bejlek This is expected to be a closely contested match, but Cristina Bucsa's experience and slightly superior hard court game should allow her to... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
56%
Cristina Bucsa |
58%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
56%
Cristina Bucsa Based on training data through early 2025, Bucsa has a higher ranking and more experience on hard courts, which gives her a slight edge. Bej...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over_2.5 Both players are competitive and matches between similar-level opponents often go to three sets. The lack of a clear favorite suggests a tig... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusCristina Bucsa 5/5
Bucsa is a Spanish hard-court specialist with stronger baseline consistency and superior ranking depth; Bejlek is a talented but less establ...
Cristina Bucsa holds the higher ranking and more consistent results on hard courts entering 2026. Sara Bejlek remains early in her developme...
Cristina Bucsa's greater experience on hard courts and general consistency typically give her an edge against rising talents. This predictio...
Cristina Bucsa is the more experienced player on the hard court surface, which is the surface for the US Open. While Sara Bejlek has shown f...
Based on training data through early 2025, Bucsa has a higher ranking and more experience on hard courts, which gives her a slight edge. Bej...
Over / Under
Consensusover_2.5 2/10
Both players are capable of taking a set in early-round play, and Bejlek has shown resilience in lower-tier competitions. Bucsa is favored b...
Both players exhibit solid but not dominant serve games on hard courts, favoring three-set matches. Head-to-head patterns from prior seasons...
A competitive encounter is expected, and Bejlek's potential to challenge for a set, even if Bucsa ultimately wins, makes a three-set match p...
This is expected to be a closely contested match, but Cristina Bucsa's experience and slightly superior hard court game should allow her to...
Both players are competitive and matches between similar-level opponents often go to three sets. The lack of a clear favorite suggests a tig...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Cristina Bucsa
Claude Haiku 4.5
Cristina Bucsa
Grok 4 Fast
Cristina Bucsa
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Cristina Bucsa
DeepSeek V3
Cristina Bucsa
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
38108340c6718574…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31799,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Sara Bejlek",
"home": "Cristina Bucsa"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.