Colorado Rockies vs Pittsburgh Pirates
Kickoff · Sat, Jun 20 · 00:40 GMT+0000
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
dc47dd04bcb15f27…
- Sport
- Sat, Jun 20 · 00:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- h2h · totals · spreads · first_five_innings
- Source
- The Odds API · live
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 4351,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-06-20T00:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Pittsburgh Pirates",
"home": "Colorado Rockies"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-16T06:18:42+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models picked
Who picked what
15 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic · 20-47 -30.7u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic · 20-47 -27.1u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic · 201-251 -196.7u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic · 232-276 -221.0u |
58%
Colorado Rockies |
64%
Over 8.5 |
54%
Colorado Rockies -1.5 |
60%
Over 4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Colorado Rockies Colorado plays at high altitude in Coors Field, historically a hitter-friendly park that boosts run production and home-team offensive advan...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
64%
Over 8.5 Coors Field is one of MLB's most offense-friendly parks; historically it produces elevated run totals compared to neutral venues. Both the R...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
Colorado Rockies -1.5 The Rockies' home-field advantage at Coors combined with historical struggles by visiting pitchers in thin air supports a modest spread edge...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
60%
Over 4.5 Early-inning scoring at Coors Field is typically elevated due to the park's hitter-friendly profile and reduced pitcher effectiveness. Batte... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai · 51-65 -9.6u |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai · 52-117 -86.0u |
65%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
55%
over |
60%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Pittsburgh Pirates The Pittsburgh Pirates have a stronger overall record and have been performing well at home, which gives them an edge over the Colorado Rock...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown the ability to score runs, and with Coors Field's hitter-friendly environment, the game is likely to see more than 2.5...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Pittsburgh Pirates The Pirates' home advantage and superior record suggest they are likely to win by at least one run against the Rockies.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates The Pirates' strong home performance and the Rockies' struggles on the road suggest the Pirates may lead after the first five innings.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o3 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Heavy FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai · 145-303 -211.3u |
53%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
56%
over |
51%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
52%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Pittsburgh Pirates Both teams enter as rebuilding clubs with poor overall records in recent seasons; Pittsburgh has shown marginally better road performance ag...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
56%
over Coors Field historically produces elevated run totals even in early summer; both rotations project as below-average, increasing the likeliho...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Pittsburgh Pirates Run-line pricing typically favors the road team when the home side is the weaker club overall; Pittsburgh's projected starter holds a slight...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Pittsburgh Pirates Early-inning matchups lean toward the visitor given typical Rockies starter vulnerabilities; limited rest differentials favor Pittsburgh thr... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro FlagshipGoogle · 14-46 -31.9u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google · 176-261 -223.1u |
55%
Colorado Rockies |
65%
Over 10.5 |
52%
Colorado Rockies -1.5 |
53%
Colorado Rockies |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Colorado Rockies This prediction relies on general team profiles and historical trends from training data, as the game is far in the future (June 2026). The...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 10.5 Predicting for a future game (June 2026) means relying on general knowledge of MLB venues. Coors Field is notoriously a high-scoring park du...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Colorado Rockies -1.5 Based on historical trends from training data for a future game (June 2026), the Rockies at Coors Field often win by more than a single run...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Colorado Rockies This pick relies on general team characteristics and historical Coors Field performance from training data for a future game (June 2026). Th... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google · 84-212 -157.8u |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
58%
over |
53%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
54%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates Based on training data, the Pittsburgh Pirates generally perform better than the Colorado Rockies, especially away from Coors Field. The Pir...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over The Colorado Rockies' home games often see higher scores due to the thin air, while the Pittsburgh Pirates have shown an ability to score ru...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Pittsburgh Pirates Given the slight edge in head-to-head and general performance metrics, the Pittsburgh Pirates are favored to cover a standard spread. They a...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Pittsburgh Pirates The Pittsburgh Pirates' starting pitchers have historically been more reliable in the early innings compared to the Rockies. This gives them... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek · 201-294 -242.4u |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
60%
Over 8.5 |
40%
Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 |
50%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates Based on training data through late 2025, the Pirates are projected to be slightly stronger overall, but the Rockies have home-field advanta...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 8.5 Coors Field is known for high scoring games, with an average total often exceeding 9 runs. Both teams have average pitching staffs, and the...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 The Pirates are slight favorites but covering a 1.5-run spread on the road is tough, especially at Coors Field where games are often close....
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
50%
Pittsburgh Pirates Early innings often favor the better overall team, and the Pirates' projected edge in starting pitching (based on general team quality) give... |
|||||
|
Consensus |
Pittsburgh Pirates 4/6 |
over 3/6 |
Pittsburgh Pirates 3/6 |
Pittsburgh Pirates 4/6 |
|
Pro on-demand
Request an AI audit
Have the frontier lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.
Ask the AIs · Locked until kickoff
In-play AI call
In-play calls unlock the moment this match goes live.
Sign in to ask the AIs about this match. Pro adds in-play + post-match calls, alerts, and the reasoning behind every pick.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.