Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 7–10
Colorado Rockies logo

Colorado RockiesvsMiami Marlins

Miami Marlins logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final7–10 Locked 24picks · 16 graded
Recap Consensus missed

Colorado Rockies 7–10 Miami Marlins

4 of 6 AIs leaned Colorado Rockies — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
Colorado Rockies 4/6
Correct calls
2/6
Final
7–10

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Colorado Rockies 4/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Colorado Rockies L

The Rockies play at Coors Field, one of baseball's most hitter-friendly parks, which historically favors the home team in run production. Mi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Miami Marlins W

The Miami Marlins have shown a stronger performance in recent matchups against the Colorado Rockies, with a higher win rate in their last fi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 57% Colorado Rockies L

Colorado plays at Coors Field which inflates offense for both sides but favors the home team overall. Marlins have historically struggled on...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Colorado Rockies L

Based on general MLB trends, the Colorado Rockies typically benefit from a significant home-field advantage at Coors Field, where the altitu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Miami Marlins W

While the Rockies have a home-field advantage, the Marlins have shown better recent form. This matchup is expected to be close, but the Marl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Colorado Rockies L

Based on training data through 2025, the Rockies have a slight edge at home, especially at high altitude, while the Marlins have struggled o...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Colorado Rockies -1.5 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Colorado Rockies -1.5 L

The -1.5 spread slightly favors the Rockies as the home team at Coors Field. While the spread is modest, home-field advantage combined with...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Miami Marlins W

Considering the Marlins' recent form and the Rockies' home struggles, the Marlins are likely to cover the -1 spread. Their superior performa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Colorado Rockies

Rockies receive a modest home spread edge due to park factors even when overall team quality is comparable. Marlins road performance against...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Colorado Rockies -1.5 L

Given the strong home-field advantage and expected high scoring at Coors Field, the Rockies often win by multiple runs when they secure a vi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Miami Marlins W

Given the slight edge in form for the Marlins, they are also slightly favored to cover a small spread. The Rockies' home advantage might kee...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 45% Colorado Rockies -1.5 L

While the Rockies are favored, covering a 1.5 run spread is risky given both teams' inconsistency. The home field advantage may not be enoug...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Over 9.5 W

Coors Field is infamous for inflating run totals due to high elevation (5,280 ft), thin air, and a short right-field line. The Rockies' home...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over W

Both teams have demonstrated offensive capabilities in recent games, suggesting a likelihood of a high-scoring matchup. Historical data indi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 61% over

Coors Field is the highest-scoring park in baseball so totals trend well above league average. Both teams feature lineups prone to extra-bas...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Over 11.5 W

Coors Field consistently produces the highest run totals in MLB due to its high altitude, which reduces air density and allows the ball to t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over W

Both teams have offenses capable of scoring runs, and their pitching can be inconsistent. The over is slightly favored in this matchup.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% over W

Coors Field historically has high scoring games due to altitude, and both teams have average to below-average pitching. Expect total runs to...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Colorado Rockies 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Over 4.5

Early-inning scoring at Coors Field is typically elevated relative to league average due to the park's extreme hitter-friendly conditions an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Miami Marlins

The Marlins have been strong in the early innings of recent games, suggesting they will lead after the first five innings. Their early-game...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Colorado Rockies

Early innings at Coors still benefit from park effects though bullpen usage later can alter totals. Marlins starters have shown vulnerabilit...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 57% Colorado Rockies

The Coors Field effect tends to manifest early in games, benefiting the home team's offense from the start. Pitchers often struggle to adapt...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Miami Marlins

The Marlins have shown a tendency to start games strong. While the Rockies can be potent at home, the Marlins' early-game performance gives...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Colorado Rockies

Early innings often favor the home team at Coors Field due to adjustment to altitude. The Rockies' starting pitching is slightly better than...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Miami Marlins

60
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Colorado Rockies

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Colorado Rockies

57
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Colorado Rockies

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Miami Marlins

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Colorado Rockies

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1039–1061 · 49%
-752.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: f427aeefb2b49e3b…
Kickoff
Tue, Jun 30 · 00:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 7775,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-30T00:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Miami Marlins",
        "home": "Colorado Rockies"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →