Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Coors Field
Upcoming · in 83h 10m
Colorado Rockies logo

Colorado RockiesvsCleveland Guardians

Cleveland Guardians logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks AIs split

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
Cleveland Guardians 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Cleveland Guardians -1.5

Cleveland's recent win provides a marginal momentum edge despite a poor 1–4 streak. Home field at Coors typically cuts Cleveland's deficit,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 38% Cleveland Guardians -1.5

Picking Cleveland to cover -1.5 (win by 2+ runs) is harder at Coors because park-run inflation increases variance; although I expect the Gua...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Colorado Rockies

Given the Rockies' home advantage and the Guardians' slightly worse away performance, the Rockies are likely to cover the -1 spread in a clo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% Cleveland Guardians

Cleveland has shown better run prevention on the road historically. Rockies bullpen usage and rest data point to late-game vulnerability. Tr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Colorado Rockies -1

Building on the home-field advantage at Coors and the expectation of a high-scoring game, the Rockies have a decent chance to win by more th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% Cleveland Guardians

Given the slight uncertainty in pitching matchups and the potential for Coors Field to inflate scoring, the Guardians are favored to cover a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 40% Colorado Rockies -1.5

The Rockies are slight favorites at home, but winning by 2 runs or more is less likely. The Guardians have competent pitching and the game c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Cleveland Guardians 2/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 61% Over 4.5 (first 5 innings)

The first five innings at Coors Field historically see elevated run-scoring as hitters adjust to the thin air and ball carries further. Colo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Cleveland Guardians

Early-game advantage usually tracks the starting pitchers; Cleveland's probable starter group (G. Williams) has been effective in early fram...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Colorado Rockies

The Rockies' home advantage and the Guardians' slightly worse away performance suggest they may lead after the first five innings, but the g...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Cleveland Guardians

Early innings favor the stronger lineup before Rockies bullpen and altitude fully impact. Guardians recent form shows they score early again...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Colorado Rockies

The Coors Field effect is immediate, boosting the home team's offense from the first inning. Without specific starting pitcher matchups for...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% over

The early innings at Coors Field often see higher scoring due to the park's offensive nature. Both starting pitchers may struggle to contain...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Match winner

Consensus
Cleveland Guardians 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Cleveland Guardians

Cleveland's recent form is poor (1W–4L in last 5) but Colorado is worse (2W–3L). The Guardians' recent win breaks a four-game losing streak...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 63% Cleveland Guardians

Cleveland is the better team overall (season and roster depth) and appears to have a stronger starting option in the probable-rotation group...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Colorado Rockies

The Colorado Rockies have a home record of 27-32, while the Cleveland Guardians have an away record of 29-28. The Rockies' home advantage an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Cleveland Guardians

Guardians enter with a stronger overall roster profile from historical patterns despite recent skid. Rockies remain one of the weaker home t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Colorado Rockies

This prediction relies on general team tendencies and the significant home-field advantage at Coors Field, as specific 2026 data is unavaila...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Cleveland Guardians

The Guardians have a slight edge due to a potentially more stable pitching matchup. While the Rockies have home-field advantage at Coors Fie...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Colorado Rockies

Training data through 2025-09, but this is a 2026 game so predictions are based on historical team quality and Coors Field advantage. The Ro...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 65% Over

Coors Field is the most offensively friendly ballpark in MLB; combined scoring over the last 5 matches shows Colorado (25 scored) and Clevel...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% over

Coors Field historically inflates runs and the Aug 23 forecast shows warm temperatures (~90°F) with a light (≈8–10 mph) wind component that...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over

Coors Field is known for high-scoring games due to its altitude and hitter-friendly conditions. Both teams have been averaging around 4 runs...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 67% over

Coors Field altitude consistently inflates run totals regardless of starters. Both teams have allowed 22+ runs in last 5 games. Training dat...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Over

Coors Field is renowned as the most hitter-friendly park in MLB due to its high altitude, consistently leading to higher run totals. Even wi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

Coors Field is known for its hitter-friendly environment, significantly increasing the likelihood of a high-scoring game. Coupled with both...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 68% Over 2.5

Coors Field inflates run scoring significantly due to altitude. Even without specific starter info, the total is likely high, and the over 2...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First five innings h2h

Consensus
Colorado Rockies 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 50% Colorado Rockies

In the first five innings, the starting pitchers often determine the outcome. Coors field effects are present, but early innings may still f...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Cleveland Guardians

63
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Cleveland Guardians

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Cleveland Guardians

58
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Colorado Rockies

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Colorado Rockies

53
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Cleveland Guardians

52
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Colorado Rockies

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1058–806 · 57%
-609.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 694–590 · 54%
-369.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1132–1113 · 50%
-927.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 743–746 · 50%
-504.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1111–1145 · 49%
-836.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 878–934 · 48%
-732.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 44b6a71bc4ccc3b4…
Kickoff
Sun, Aug 23 · 19:10 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 27832,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Coors Field",
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-23T19:10:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 19:10:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Cleveland Guardians",
        "home": "Colorado Rockies"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LLLLW",
            "record": "1W-0D-4L",
            "scored": 17,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 22
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LWLWL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 25,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 27
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 45,
            "home": 45
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →