Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 9–4
Cleveland Guardians logo

Cleveland GuardiansvsTexas Rangers

Texas Rangers logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final9–4 Locked 28picks · 18 graded AIs split
Recap Consensus missed

Cleveland Guardians 9–4 Texas Rangers

4 of 7 AIs leaned Texas Rangers — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
Texas Rangers 4/7
Correct calls
3/7
Final
9–4

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Texas Rangers 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Texas Rangers L

Texas enters with stronger recent form (3W-2L vs Cleveland's 2W-3L) and a +1 run differential over the last 5 matches, indicating more explo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% Texas Rangers L

Texas enters the series on a five-game winning streak and StatMuse lists MacKenzie Gore (TEX) vs Joey Cantillo (CLE) as the probable starter...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Texas Rangers L

The Texas Rangers have shown a stronger recent form with three wins in their last five games, compared to the Cleveland Guardians' two wins....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Cleveland Guardians W

Rangers enter with stronger recent form (WWWLL) but Guardians benefit from home field and equal rest. Both clubs show high run output recent...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Texas Rangers L

Based solely on the provided brief's hypothetical recent form, the Texas Rangers show a slightly better offensive output and overall record...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Cleveland Guardians W

The Cleveland Guardians are at home, and while their recent form is slightly worse than the Rangers', they have a better pitching matchup fo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Cleveland Guardians W

Guardians have home-field advantage at Progressive Field, which historically boosts run-scoring. Texas form is slightly better but both team...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Texas Rangers 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Texas Rangers -1.5 L

Texas's recent +1 run differential and superior offensive output (24 runs vs 15 in last 5 matches) supports a 1-2 run victory. Cleveland's d...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Cleveland Guardians +1.5 W

Given the pitcher-friendly park, the volatility of Gore (capable of quality starts but also occasional short outings) and the Guardians' hom...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 50% Texas Rangers L

The Rangers' recent form and overall season performance give them a slight advantage, but the close nature of their recent games suggests a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 49% Cleveland Guardians -1.5 W

Home run-line value leans Guardians given their defensive edge at home despite slightly worse recent record. Rangers' offensive surge makes...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Cleveland Guardians +1.5 W

The Cleveland Guardians, playing at home, have shown decent pitching in their recent form (3.4 R/G conceded), suggesting they can keep games...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Texas Rangers L

While the Guardians are at home, the Rangers have been in better recent form and have a more potent offense capable of covering a small spre...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 21% Cleveland Guardians -1.5 W

Spreads are risky because margins are thin. Historically, both teams have been competitive, and Texas has a slightly better record. Guardian...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
under 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Over W

Combined 47 runs scored in the last 5 matches for both teams (24 Rangers + 15 Guardians + 8 aggregate from their opponents' totals) points t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% under L

Both probable starters are lefties (Gore and Cantillo) with decent ability to eat innings and Progressive Field is a noted pitcher-friendly...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over W

Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently, with the Rangers scoring 24 runs and conceding 23 in their last five matches,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% over

Combined last-5 scoring averages exceed 8 runs per team per game. Both sides rest 3 days so bullpens are fresh but offenses are clicking. Ne...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Under

The Cleveland Guardians' recent games have been lower-scoring due to their relatively strong pitching (3.4 R/G conceded) and weaker offense...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% under L

Both teams have struggled offensively in their recent games, and the starting pitchers are expected to perform well. The ballpark in Clevela...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% over 8.5

Both lineups have shown decent recent hitting (Rangers 24 runs in 5 games, Guardians 15 in 5). Weather in Cleveland in July tends to be warm...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Texas Rangers 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Texas Rangers

Early-inning outcomes are heavily starter-dependent; without confirmed pitcher names, I rely on recent form trends. Texas's offensive surge...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% Texas Rangers

First-five leans favor Texas: MacKenzie Gore's recent string of quality early-inning performances gives the Rangers a modest edge through fi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Texas Rangers

The Rangers have demonstrated a stronger start in recent games, suggesting they may lead after the first five innings. However, the Guardian...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Cleveland Guardians

Starting-pitcher matchup and platoon edges typically decide the first five; home side holds slight statistical advantage in early innings pe...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Cleveland Guardians

The first five innings often hinge on the starting pitcher matchup and early offensive execution. Based on the provided brief, the Guardians...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% under

Early innings often see pitchers still settling in, and both teams have struggled to score early in their recent matchups. The matchup favor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 48% Texas Rangers

First five innings often depend on the starting pitcher. Without specific pitcher data, the Rangers' slightly better recent form and road su...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Texas Rangers

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Texas Rangers

57
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Texas Rangers

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Cleveland Guardians

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Cleveland Guardians

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Cleveland Guardians

52
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Texas Rangers

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1062–1080 · 50%
-771.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: f40076fb16adaefc…
Kickoff
Wed, Jul 1 · 17:10 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 8073,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-01T17:10:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Wed, 01 Jul 2026 17:10:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Texas Rangers",
        "home": "Cleveland Guardians"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "WWWLL",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 24,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 23
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WLWLL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 15,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 17
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 3,
            "home": 3
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →