Cleveland Guardians vs Seattle Mariners
Kickoff · Sun, Jun 28 · 17:40 GMT+0000
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
08fd7e83ff9c8ac0…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Jun 28 · 17:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 7567,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-06-28T17:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 28 Jun 2026 17:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Seattle Mariners",
"home": "Cleveland Guardians"
},
"version": "v1",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 5 models picked
Who picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
55%
Cleveland Guardians |
52%
Over |
51%
Cleveland Guardians -1.5 |
53%
Cleveland Guardians |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Cleveland Guardians Cleveland has established itself as a competitive AL Central team with strong pitching depth and a balanced roster. Seattle has shown incons...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over Both Cleveland and Seattle play in parks with moderate run environments. June weather in late afternoon should favor batting. MLB average ru...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Cleveland Guardians -1.5 Home-field advantage in baseball is modest but real (~2–3 win percentage points). Cleveland's organizational depth and consistency give them...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Cleveland Guardians Early-inning matchups often reflect starting pitcher quality and leadoff lineup strength. Cleveland's pitching infrastructure is generally r... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Cleveland Guardians |
60%
over |
55%
Cleveland Guardians |
55%
Cleveland Guardians |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Cleveland Guardians The Cleveland Guardians have a strong home record this season, while the Seattle Mariners have struggled on the road. Recent head-to-head ma...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have potent offenses, and recent games have seen high-scoring outcomes. The over 2.5 total runs is likely.
🔍 researched
1 source cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Cleveland Guardians With the Guardians favored by 1 run, their home advantage and recent form make them likely to cover the spread.
🔍 researched
1 source cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Cleveland Guardians The Guardians' starting pitcher has a strong first-inning ERA, and their offense tends to start games aggressively.
🔍 researched
1 source cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Cleveland Guardians |
51%
under |
48%
home_ -1.5 |
54%
Cleveland Guardians |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Cleveland Guardians Cleveland Guardians historically hold a slight edge in home games against Seattle due to stronger pitching staff depth. Mariners road perfor...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
under Both teams feature pitching-oriented rosters that typically keep run totals low in interleague-style scheduling. Historical head-to-head gam...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
home_ -1.5 Guardians bullpen stability gives them a narrow edge to win by 2+ runs at home. Mariners have shown vulnerability to late-inning deficits on...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Cleveland Guardians Cleveland's starting rotation depth provides an advantage in the opening five innings at home. Seattle has struggled to score early on the r... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Cleveland Guardians |
55%
Under 8.5 |
58%
Seattle Mariners +1.5 |
38%
Draw |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Cleveland Guardians Based on my training data up to early 2024, the Cleveland Guardians typically perform well at home, often leveraging solid fundamentals and...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 8.5 My training data suggests both the Mariners and Guardians often feature strong pitching, particularly in their rotations and bullpens respec...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Seattle Mariners +1.5 Even if the Guardians win, my training data indicates many MLB games are decided by one run, especially between relatively evenly matched te...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
38%
Draw My training data suggests both teams often feature strong starting pitching, leading to low-scoring affairs through the initial innings. A t... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Seattle Mariners |
55%
Under |
45%
Seattle Mariners -1.5 |
57%
Seattle Mariners |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Seattle Mariners Based on training data through early 2025, the Mariners have a strong pitching advantage with a deeper rotation. However, the Guardians play...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under Both teams feature strong starting rotations and bullpens, suggesting a low-scoring affair. The Mariners' offense has been inconsistent, and...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
45%
Seattle Mariners -1.5 The Mariners are slight favorites, but winning by 2+ runs is not guaranteed. Cleveland's pitching can keep the game close. The -1.5 spread i...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
57%
Seattle Mariners The Mariners have a top-tier rotation, often dominating the first five innings. Their bullpen is deeper, but starters go deeper. Cleveland's... |
|||||
|
Consensus |
Cleveland Guardians 4/5 |
Over 1/5 |
Cleveland Guardians -1.5 1/5 |
Cleveland Guardians 3/5 |
|
Match winner
ConsensusCleveland Guardians 4/5
Cleveland has established itself as a competitive AL Central team with strong pitching depth and a balanced roster. Seattle has shown incons...
The Cleveland Guardians have a strong home record this season, while the Seattle Mariners have struggled on the road. Recent head-to-head ma...
Cleveland Guardians historically hold a slight edge in home games against Seattle due to stronger pitching staff depth. Mariners road perfor...
Based on my training data up to early 2024, the Cleveland Guardians typically perform well at home, often leveraging solid fundamentals and...
Based on training data through early 2025, the Mariners have a strong pitching advantage with a deeper rotation. However, the Guardians play...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 1/5
Both Cleveland and Seattle play in parks with moderate run environments. June weather in late afternoon should favor batting. MLB average ru...
Both teams have potent offenses, and recent games have seen high-scoring outcomes. The over 2.5 total runs is likely.
Both teams feature pitching-oriented rosters that typically keep run totals low in interleague-style scheduling. Historical head-to-head gam...
My training data suggests both the Mariners and Guardians often feature strong pitching, particularly in their rotations and bullpens respec...
Both teams feature strong starting rotations and bullpens, suggesting a low-scoring affair. The Mariners' offense has been inconsistent, and...
Spread
ConsensusCleveland Guardians -1.5 1/5
Home-field advantage in baseball is modest but real (~2–3 win percentage points). Cleveland's organizational depth and consistency give them...
With the Guardians favored by 1 run, their home advantage and recent form make them likely to cover the spread.
Guardians bullpen stability gives them a narrow edge to win by 2+ runs at home. Mariners have shown vulnerability to late-inning deficits on...
Even if the Guardians win, my training data indicates many MLB games are decided by one run, especially between relatively evenly matched te...
The Mariners are slight favorites, but winning by 2+ runs is not guaranteed. Cleveland's pitching can keep the game close. The -1.5 spread i...
First 5 innings
ConsensusCleveland Guardians 3/5
Early-inning matchups often reflect starting pitcher quality and leadoff lineup strength. Cleveland's pitching infrastructure is generally r...
The Guardians' starting pitcher has a strong first-inning ERA, and their offense tends to start games aggressively.
Cleveland's starting rotation depth provides an advantage in the opening five innings at home. Seattle has struggled to score early on the r...
My training data suggests both teams often feature strong starting pitching, leading to low-scoring affairs through the initial innings. A t...
The Mariners have a top-tier rotation, often dominating the first five innings. Their bullpen is deeper, but starters go deeper. Cleveland's...
Pro on-demand
Request an AI audit
Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.