Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Progressive Field
Upcoming · in 80h 39m
Cleveland Guardians logo

Cleveland GuardiansvsSan Francisco Giants

San Francisco Giants logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks AIs split

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

First 5 innings

Consensus
Cleveland Guardians 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 60% Under 4.5

Early-inning totals in close matchups typically reflect starting pitcher quality and early bullpen deployment. Cleveland's defensive unit ha...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 52% Cleveland Guardians

First-five leans to Cleveland: Gavin Williams has been strong in his first 5–6 innings this season (good K and low home ER/inning splits) an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% San Francisco Giants

The Giants have shown a slight edge in recent matchups against the Guardians, with a 2-1 victory in their last encounter on June 19, 2025. (...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Cleveland Guardians

Early innings favor the home side slightly due to pitching matchups and park factors. Limited recent data shows similar distribution to full...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% San Francisco Giants

The San Francisco Giants' stronger offensive output in recent games (based on training data) gives them an advantage in the early innings. A...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% San Francisco Giants

Logan Webb's strong performance in the early innings of his recent starts gives the Giants an advantage in the first five. Shane Bieber has...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 53% Cleveland Guardians

The Guardians' starting pitching is generally solid in the early innings, while the Giants' starters have had moderate early-game struggles....

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
San Francisco Giants 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% San Francisco Giants

San Francisco enters with superior recent offensive output (25 runs in last 5 vs Cleveland's 17), and a 2-3 record against Cleveland's 1-4 d...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% Cleveland Guardians

Probable matchup (Gavin Williams for CLE vs Landen Roupp for SF) favors the Guardians: Williams has a stronger season K profile, better home...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% San Francisco Giants

The San Francisco Giants have shown a slight edge in recent matchups against the Cleveland Guardians, with a 2-1 victory in their last encou...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Cleveland Guardians

Guardians are at home with a slight edge despite recent poor form. Both teams show losing records in last 5 but Cleveland's home venue provi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% San Francisco Giants

Based on analysis of recent team forms from training data through 2025-09, the San Francisco Giants exhibit slightly better offensive produc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% San Francisco Giants

Logan Webb has been pitching significantly better than Shane Bieber recently, with lower ERAs and more strikeouts. While the team forms are...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Cleveland Guardians

Training data through 2025-09, no live research tool used. The Guardians have a strong home advantage at Progressive Field and the Giants ha...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Under 8.5

Despite Giants' offensive strength (5 runs/game in sample), Cleveland's defensive pressure (4.4 runs conceded/game) and current slump sugges...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% over

Recent team context shows both clubs have allowed and scored a non-trivial number of runs in their last five games; Roupp has been up-and-do...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over

Both teams have struggled offensively this season, with the Giants averaging 4.1 runs per game and the Guardians averaging 4.0 runs per game...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over

Both teams have allowed high runs recently with combined scoring trends above average. Progressive Field tends to play neutral but high run...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Under 8.5

Progressive Field is generally known as a pitcher-friendly park, tending to suppress run scoring. The Cleveland Guardians' offense has shown...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% under

Despite the recent struggles of both teams, the starting pitchers Logan Webb and Shane Bieber are generally reliable. The weather forecast a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% over

Both teams have shown inconsistent bullpens and the Giants have been scoring moderately. Progressive Field can play neutral, but the probabl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
San Francisco Giants +1.5 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% San Francisco Giants -1.5

Giants' superior run-scoring rate (5/game vs 3.4) and Cleveland's slump (1 win in 5) support a narrow away win spread. The -1.5 line reflect...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 56% San Francisco Giants +1.5

Cleveland is the favorite in moneyline terms but a -1.5 runline requires a multi-run win; given Roupp's upside in day splits and the Giants'...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% San Francisco Giants

The Giants have a slight edge in recent matchups against the Guardians, with a 2-1 victory in their last encounter on June 19, 2025. ([thesc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Cleveland Guardians

Home team receives run advantage in spreads modeling. Guardians recent form is worse but home field and rest parity keep the lean modest. Tr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Cleveland Guardians +1.5

While the Giants are favored to win based on recent form from training data, baseball games are often decided by narrow margins. The Guardia...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% San Francisco Giants

Given Logan Webb's recent pitching dominance compared to Shane Bieber's slight struggles, we anticipate the Giants to potentially cover a sm...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 53% San Francisco Giants +1.5

The Giants are likely to be competitive and keep the game close even if they lose. With the Guardians as slight favorites, a one-run margin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

San Francisco Giants

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Cleveland Guardians

58
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

San Francisco Giants

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

San Francisco Giants

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

San Francisco Giants

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Cleveland Guardians

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Cleveland Guardians

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1107–1136 · 49%
-827.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 5098f87b6a924307…
Kickoff
Thu, Aug 20 · 17:10 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 27268,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Progressive Field",
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-20T17:10:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Thu, 20 Aug 2026 17:10:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "San Francisco Giants",
        "home": "Cleveland Guardians"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LLWLW",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 25,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 31
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LLLLW",
            "record": "1W-0D-4L",
            "scored": 17,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 22
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 42,
            "home": 42
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →