Cleveland GuardiansvsNew York Mets
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
First five innings total runs
?
First five innings total runs
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
New York Mets 3/6 models |
New York Mets 4/5 models |
New York Mets 6/6 models |
over 3/6 models |
over 1/1 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
55%
New York Mets -1.5 |
60%
New York Mets |
62%
New York Mets |
58%
Over 8.5 |
— | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
New York Mets -1.5 The Mets' offensive dominance in recent form (3-2, 7.6 RPG) combined with Cleveland's 1-4 slump suggests a margin victory is plausible for N...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
60%
New York Mets Early innings are typically dominated by starting pitchers rather than late-game bullpen variance. The Mets' recent offensive form and Cleve...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
New York Mets The Mets have won 3 of their last 5 matches and are averaging 7.6 runs per game over that span, while Cleveland has lost 4 of 5 with only 3....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 8.5 The Mets' recent offensive surge (38 runs in 5 games) combined with Cleveland's weak pitching environment suggests run-heavy conditions. Pro...
First five innings total runs
?
First five innings total runs
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
First five innings total runs
?
First five innings total runs
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
New York Mets |
55%
New York Mets |
55%
New York Mets |
60%
over |
— | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
New York Mets The Mets' slight advantage in overall performance and recent form suggests they are more likely to cover the spread of -1 in this matchup.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
New York Mets The Mets' starting lineup and recent performance suggest they are more likely to lead after the first five innings, giving them an edge in t...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
New York Mets The New York Mets have a slightly better overall record and have been more consistent in recent games compared to the Cleveland Guardians. T...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities, and the game is expected to have a total score exceeding 2.5 runs. The combination of...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First five innings total runs
?
First five innings total runs
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
51%
New York Mets |
53%
New York Mets |
54%
New York Mets |
52%
over |
— | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
New York Mets Mets better recent results support a small run-line edge despite road status. Guardians poor form increases chance of blowout loss. No 2026...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
New York Mets Early innings favor the team with better overall form; Mets hold that edge. Pitcher matchup unknown but form suggests Mets can jump ahead qu...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
New York Mets Mets show stronger recent form with a 3-2 record and higher scoring output compared to Guardians' 1-4 slump. Progressive Field favors pitchi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both teams combined for high run totals in recent matches despite Guardians' low scoring. August weather in Cleveland often allows decent ca...
First five innings total runs
?
First five innings total runs
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
56%
New York Mets -1.5 |
55%
New York Mets |
58%
New York Mets |
55%
Over 8.5 |
— | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
56%
New York Mets -1.5 Leveraging historical data, the New York Mets' superior recent form and significant offensive advantage (averaging 7.6 runs per game vs. Gua...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
New York Mets Without specific starting pitcher information for 2026, the first five innings prediction relies on the overall team strength and recent off...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
New York Mets Based on training data up to my last update, the New York Mets display superior recent form with a 3-2 record and a significantly more poten...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 The New York Mets have been involved in notably high-scoring games recently, averaging 17 total runs across their last five contests (38 sco...
First five innings total runs
?
First five innings total runs
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
54%
New York Mets |
— |
58%
New York Mets |
55%
over |
53%
over |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
New York Mets Given the Mets' better recent form and higher offensive output, they are slightly favored to cover a -1.5 spread. The Guardians' recent stru...
3 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
New York Mets The New York Mets have a superior recent form compared to the Cleveland Guardians, and while both teams have had equal rest, the Mets' offen...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over The average runs scored by the Mets in their last 5 games is 7.6, while the Guardians' average conceded is 4.4. Given Progressive Field is g...
3 sources cited
First five innings total runs
?
First five innings total runs
Market explanation coming soon.
53%
over The early game momentum is often set by starting pitchers. While specific starters aren't known, the Mets' offensive strength and the Guardi...
3 sources cited
|
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
50%
New York Mets -1 |
55%
Under 2.5 |
55%
New York Mets |
60%
Over 2.5 |
— | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
New York Mets -1 The Mets' superior form gives them a slight edge to win by more than one run, but the Guardians' home advantage could keep it close. With un...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Under 2.5 Starting pitchers often dominate early innings before bullpens take over, and both teams have some offensive inconsistencies. Without live d...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
New York Mets Based on training data through 2025-09, the Mets have a stronger roster and better recent form, but the Guardians have home-field advantage....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Progressive Field generally plays neutral to slightly hitter-friendly, and both teams have averaged over 4 runs per game in recent matches....
First five innings total runs
?
First five innings total runs
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
Spread
ConsensusNew York Mets 3/6
The Mets' offensive dominance in recent form (3-2, 7.6 RPG) combined with Cleveland's 1-4 slump suggests a margin victory is plausible for N...
The Mets' slight advantage in overall performance and recent form suggests they are more likely to cover the spread of -1 in this matchup.
Mets better recent results support a small run-line edge despite road status. Guardians poor form increases chance of blowout loss. No 2026...
Leveraging historical data, the New York Mets' superior recent form and significant offensive advantage (averaging 7.6 runs per game vs. Gua...
Given the Mets' better recent form and higher offensive output, they are slightly favored to cover a -1.5 spread. The Guardians' recent stru...
The Mets' superior form gives them a slight edge to win by more than one run, but the Guardians' home advantage could keep it close. With un...
First 5 innings
ConsensusNew York Mets 4/5
Early innings are typically dominated by starting pitchers rather than late-game bullpen variance. The Mets' recent offensive form and Cleve...
The Mets' starting lineup and recent performance suggest they are more likely to lead after the first five innings, giving them an edge in t...
Early innings favor the team with better overall form; Mets hold that edge. Pitcher matchup unknown but form suggests Mets can jump ahead qu...
Without specific starting pitcher information for 2026, the first five innings prediction relies on the overall team strength and recent off...
Starting pitchers often dominate early innings before bullpens take over, and both teams have some offensive inconsistencies. Without live d...
Match winner
ConsensusNew York Mets 6/6
The Mets have won 3 of their last 5 matches and are averaging 7.6 runs per game over that span, while Cleveland has lost 4 of 5 with only 3....
The New York Mets have a slightly better overall record and have been more consistent in recent games compared to the Cleveland Guardians. T...
Mets show stronger recent form with a 3-2 record and higher scoring output compared to Guardians' 1-4 slump. Progressive Field favors pitchi...
Based on training data up to my last update, the New York Mets display superior recent form with a 3-2 record and a significantly more poten...
The New York Mets have a superior recent form compared to the Cleveland Guardians, and while both teams have had equal rest, the Mets' offen...
Based on training data through 2025-09, the Mets have a stronger roster and better recent form, but the Guardians have home-field advantage....
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
The Mets' recent offensive surge (38 runs in 5 games) combined with Cleveland's weak pitching environment suggests run-heavy conditions. Pro...
Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities, and the game is expected to have a total score exceeding 2.5 runs. The combination of...
Both teams combined for high run totals in recent matches despite Guardians' low scoring. August weather in Cleveland often allows decent ca...
The New York Mets have been involved in notably high-scoring games recently, averaging 17 total runs across their last five contests (38 sco...
The average runs scored by the Mets in their last 5 games is 7.6, while the Guardians' average conceded is 4.4. Given Progressive Field is g...
Progressive Field generally plays neutral to slightly hitter-friendly, and both teams have averaged over 4 runs per game in recent matches....
First five innings total runs
Consensusover 1/1
The early game momentum is often set by starting pitchers. While specific starters aren't known, the Mets' offensive strength and the Guardi...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
New York Mets
Gemini 2.5 Flash
New York Mets
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
New York Mets
GPT-4o Mini
New York Mets
DeepSeek V3
New York Mets
Grok 4 Fast
New York Mets
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a4f6dde117b1c4a7…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Aug 4 · 22:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 20118,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Progressive Field",
"league": "Major League Baseball",
"starts_at": "2026-08-04T22:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "New York Mets",
"home": "Cleveland Guardians"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WLWWL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 38,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 47
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LLLLW",
"record": "1W-0D-4L",
"scored": 17,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 22
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 26,
"home": 26
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.