Cleveland GuardiansvsMinnesota Twins
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Minnesota Twins 6/6 models |
over 3/6 models |
Minnesota Twins 3/6 models |
Minnesota Twins 5/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Minnesota Twins |
62%
Over 8.5 |
64%
Minnesota -1.5 |
58%
Minnesota -0.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Minnesota Twins Minnesota enters on a 4-1 streak with strong offensive output (28 runs in 5 matches, 5.6 rpg) while Cleveland has collapsed to 1-4 with only...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 8.5 Minnesota's recent form shows 5.6 runs per game and Cleveland 3.4 rpg over the last 5 matches, averaging 9.0 total runs per contest in this...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
64%
Minnesota -1.5 Minnesota's superior recent form (4-1 vs Cleveland's 1-4), 2-0 head-to-head advantage, and offensive firepower (28 runs in 5 vs Cleveland's...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
58%
Minnesota -0.5 Minnesota's strong offensive form and Cleveland's defensive/pitching struggles suggest the Twins can establish an early lead. First-five inn... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
60%
over |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins have shown strong recent form, winning four of their last five games, while the Cleveland Guardians have lost four of th...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have demonstrated moderate offensive capabilities, with the Twins averaging 4.9 runs per game and the Guardians averaging 3.9 run...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Minnesota Twins Given the Twins' recent strong performance and the Guardians' recent struggles, the Twins are more likely to cover the -1 spread, indicating...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Minnesota Twins The Twins' recent strong performance and the Guardians' recent struggles suggest that the Twins are more likely to lead after the first five...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
54%
Minnesota Twins |
52%
over |
51%
Minnesota Twins |
53%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
Minnesota Twins Minnesota enters with superior recent form (WWWWL) and has taken both recent head-to-head meetings. Both clubs have identical 13 rest days,...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Twins have averaged 5.6 runs per game in their last 5 while Guardians have allowed 4.4. Progressive Field tends to play neutral but both off...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Minnesota Twins Twins recent scoring edge and head-to-head wins support a small run-line lean despite playing on the road. Guardians four-game losing streak...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Minnesota Twins Early-game edge follows the Twins stronger overall form and recent series wins. Both starters are unknown but rest advantage is equal. Train... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Over 8.5 |
58%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
60%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Minnesota Twins Based on the provided context, the Minnesota Twins are in excellent recent form (4W-1L) and have won both recent head-to-head matchups again...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 The Minnesota Twins have been scoring well (average 5.6 runs per game in their last 5), contributing to an average game total of 8.8 runs. W...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Given the Twins' dominant recent form and their success in head-to-head contests, they are strong candidates to win this game by more than o...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
60%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins' superior offensive output and overall team form suggest they are likely to hold a lead by the end of the first five inn... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
52%
over |
53%
Minnesota Twins |
54%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins have stronger recent form and a favorable pitching matchup with Joe Ryan, who has been more consistent than Cleveland's...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over The total is set at 8.5. While both starters have decent ERAs, the wind blowing out at Progressive Field and the Twins' potent offense sugge...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Minnesota Twins Given Minnesota's better recent form and pitching advantage, they are slightly favored to cover the -1.5 spread. While not a strong convicti...
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins are projected to have a slight edge in the first five innings due to Joe Ryan's more reliable pitching and their recent...
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Over 7.5 |
42%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
52%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Minnesota Twins The Twins have won four of their last five and swept the Guardians in a two-game series earlier this month. Cleveland is in poor form (1-4 l...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 7.5 The Twins have scored 28 runs in their last five games (5.6 per game) while the Guardians have allowed 22 runs (4.4 per game) in their 1-4 s...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
42%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Despite the Twins' recent form, winning by multiple runs in a low-scoring game is uncertain. The Guardians have been competitive in losses,...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Minnesota Twins The Twins have had early success against Cleveland's pitching recently, scoring early in both meetings. Starting pitchers are unknowns due t... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 6/6
Minnesota enters on a 4-1 streak with strong offensive output (28 runs in 5 matches, 5.6 rpg) while Cleveland has collapsed to 1-4 with only...
The Minnesota Twins have shown strong recent form, winning four of their last five games, while the Cleveland Guardians have lost four of th...
Minnesota enters with superior recent form (WWWWL) and has taken both recent head-to-head meetings. Both clubs have identical 13 rest days,...
Based on the provided context, the Minnesota Twins are in excellent recent form (4W-1L) and have won both recent head-to-head matchups again...
The Minnesota Twins have stronger recent form and a favorable pitching matchup with Joe Ryan, who has been more consistent than Cleveland's...
The Twins have won four of their last five and swept the Guardians in a two-game series earlier this month. Cleveland is in poor form (1-4 l...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
Minnesota's recent form shows 5.6 runs per game and Cleveland 3.4 rpg over the last 5 matches, averaging 9.0 total runs per contest in this...
Both teams have demonstrated moderate offensive capabilities, with the Twins averaging 4.9 runs per game and the Guardians averaging 3.9 run...
Twins have averaged 5.6 runs per game in their last 5 while Guardians have allowed 4.4. Progressive Field tends to play neutral but both off...
The Minnesota Twins have been scoring well (average 5.6 runs per game in their last 5), contributing to an average game total of 8.8 runs. W...
The total is set at 8.5. While both starters have decent ERAs, the wind blowing out at Progressive Field and the Twins' potent offense sugge...
The Twins have scored 28 runs in their last five games (5.6 per game) while the Guardians have allowed 22 runs (4.4 per game) in their 1-4 s...
Spread
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 3/6
Minnesota's superior recent form (4-1 vs Cleveland's 1-4), 2-0 head-to-head advantage, and offensive firepower (28 runs in 5 vs Cleveland's...
Given the Twins' recent strong performance and the Guardians' recent struggles, the Twins are more likely to cover the -1 spread, indicating...
Twins recent scoring edge and head-to-head wins support a small run-line lean despite playing on the road. Guardians four-game losing streak...
Given the Twins' dominant recent form and their success in head-to-head contests, they are strong candidates to win this game by more than o...
Given Minnesota's better recent form and pitching advantage, they are slightly favored to cover the -1.5 spread. While not a strong convicti...
Despite the Twins' recent form, winning by multiple runs in a low-scoring game is uncertain. The Guardians have been competitive in losses,...
First 5 innings
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 5/6
Minnesota's strong offensive form and Cleveland's defensive/pitching struggles suggest the Twins can establish an early lead. First-five inn...
The Twins' recent strong performance and the Guardians' recent struggles suggest that the Twins are more likely to lead after the first five...
Early-game edge follows the Twins stronger overall form and recent series wins. Both starters are unknown but rest advantage is equal. Train...
The Minnesota Twins' superior offensive output and overall team form suggest they are likely to hold a lead by the end of the first five inn...
The Minnesota Twins are projected to have a slight edge in the first five innings due to Joe Ryan's more reliable pitching and their recent...
The Twins have had early success against Cleveland's pitching recently, scoring early in both meetings. Starting pitchers are unknowns due t...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Minnesota Twins
DeepSeek V3
Minnesota Twins
GPT-4o Mini
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Minnesota Twins
Grok 4 Fast
Minnesota Twins
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
2cc6358e467ccc6e…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Jul 22 · 22:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 14816,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Progressive Field",
"league": "Major League Baseball",
"starts_at": "2026-07-22T22:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Minnesota Twins",
"home": "Cleveland Guardians"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWWWL",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 28,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 16
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LLLLW",
"record": "1W-0D-4L",
"scored": 17,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 22
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 13,
"home": 13
},
"head_to_head": {
"recent": [
"2026-07-08: Minnesota Twins 6–5 Cleveland Guardians",
"2026-07-07: Minnesota Twins 3–1 Cleveland Guardians"
],
"matches": 2
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.