Cleveland GuardiansvsChicago White Sox
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Cleveland Guardians 4/5 models |
over 2/5 models |
Cleveland Guardians -1 1/5 models |
Cleveland Guardians 3/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Cleveland Guardians |
52%
Over |
54%
Cleveland Guardians -1 |
51%
Under 4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Cleveland Guardians Both teams show identical recent form (3-2 records over the last 5 matches) with comparable run differential. The Guardians have conceded fe...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over Both teams are averaging 4.8 runs per game over their last 5 matches (24 runs in 5 games each), pointing to a combined total near 9–10 runs....
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
Cleveland Guardians -1 Cleveland's superior run concession (17 vs 22) and marginally better recent form edge suggest they should win by approximately 1 run on aver...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Under 4.5 Early innings tend to favour starting pitchers before bullpen usage and lineup adjustments compound scoring. Both teams have scored 24 runs... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Chicago White Sox |
60%
over |
55%
Chicago White Sox |
55%
Chicago White Sox |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago White Sox The Chicago White Sox have a slightly better record and have shown resilience in recent games, suggesting a marginal advantage over the Clev...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently, indicating a likelihood of a total score exceeding 2.5 runs.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Chicago White Sox The White Sox's recent form and slightly better overall record suggest they are more likely to cover the -1 spread against the Guardians.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Chicago White Sox The White Sox's recent performance and starting lineup suggest they are more likely to lead after the first five innings against the Guardia...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Cleveland Guardians |
53%
over |
55%
home_ -1.5 |
58%
Cleveland Guardians |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Cleveland Guardians Guardians hold home advantage and slightly better recent form per provided data. Last three H2H games split but Cleveland won two. Training...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Both offenses averaging near 4.8 runs per game in recent samples. Ballpark and July weather typically neutral to slight over. Training data...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
home_ -1.5 Cleveland favored on moneyline and projects to cover run line at home against weaker White Sox lineup. Recent H2H and form support modest ho...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
58%
Cleveland Guardians Early innings favor stronger home club before bullpens enter. Guardians lineup has better platoon matchups in provided context. No specific... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Cleveland Guardians |
53%
Over 8.5 |
58%
Chicago White Sox +1.5 |
50%
Cleveland Guardians |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Cleveland Guardians Based on provided historical data, the Guardians hold a slight edge in recent head-to-head matchups (2 wins in 3 games). Coupled with the ho...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Over 8.5 Analyzing the last five games, both teams have shown decent offensive output, scoring 24 runs each. The Guardians have also conceded 22 runs...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Chicago White Sox +1.5 Given the historical head-to-head results often being decided by narrow margins, and the similar recent form of both teams, taking the under...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
50%
Cleveland Guardians Without specific starting pitcher information, the first five innings outcome is projected to mirror the overall game's lean towards the hom... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Cleveland Guardians |
55%
Over 8.5 |
30%
Cleveland Guardians -1.5 |
55%
Cleveland Guardians |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Cleveland Guardians Guardians have home advantage and a slightly better recent head-to-head record, though both teams have identical 3-2 form. With no starting...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Both teams have scored a combined 48 runs in their last 5 games, averaging over 9 runs per game. Recent head-to-head also saw totals of 7, 3...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
30%
Cleveland Guardians -1.5 Guardians are favored but have been inconsistent, and their recent wins have often been by one run. The spread is risky, with White Sox cove...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Cleveland Guardians Without specific pitcher data, home team advantage often plays in early innings. Guardians have a slight edge, but no strong reason to devia... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusCleveland Guardians 4/5
Both teams show identical recent form (3-2 records over the last 5 matches) with comparable run differential. The Guardians have conceded fe...
The Chicago White Sox have a slightly better record and have shown resilience in recent games, suggesting a marginal advantage over the Clev...
Guardians hold home advantage and slightly better recent form per provided data. Last three H2H games split but Cleveland won two. Training...
Based on provided historical data, the Guardians hold a slight edge in recent head-to-head matchups (2 wins in 3 games). Coupled with the ho...
Guardians have home advantage and a slightly better recent head-to-head record, though both teams have identical 3-2 form. With no starting...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/5
Both teams are averaging 4.8 runs per game over their last 5 matches (24 runs in 5 games each), pointing to a combined total near 9–10 runs....
Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently, indicating a likelihood of a total score exceeding 2.5 runs.
Both offenses averaging near 4.8 runs per game in recent samples. Ballpark and July weather typically neutral to slight over. Training data...
Analyzing the last five games, both teams have shown decent offensive output, scoring 24 runs each. The Guardians have also conceded 22 runs...
Both teams have scored a combined 48 runs in their last 5 games, averaging over 9 runs per game. Recent head-to-head also saw totals of 7, 3...
Spread
ConsensusCleveland Guardians -1 1/5
Cleveland's superior run concession (17 vs 22) and marginally better recent form edge suggest they should win by approximately 1 run on aver...
The White Sox's recent form and slightly better overall record suggest they are more likely to cover the -1 spread against the Guardians.
Cleveland favored on moneyline and projects to cover run line at home against weaker White Sox lineup. Recent H2H and form support modest ho...
Given the historical head-to-head results often being decided by narrow margins, and the similar recent form of both teams, taking the under...
Guardians are favored but have been inconsistent, and their recent wins have often been by one run. The spread is risky, with White Sox cove...
First 5 innings
ConsensusCleveland Guardians 3/5
Early innings tend to favour starting pitchers before bullpen usage and lineup adjustments compound scoring. Both teams have scored 24 runs...
The White Sox's recent performance and starting lineup suggest they are more likely to lead after the first five innings against the Guardia...
Early innings favor stronger home club before bullpens enter. Guardians lineup has better platoon matchups in provided context. No specific...
Without specific starting pitcher information, the first five innings outcome is projected to mirror the overall game's lean towards the hom...
Without specific pitcher data, home team advantage often plays in early innings. Guardians have a slight edge, but no strong reason to devia...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Cleveland Guardians
DeepSeek V3
Cleveland Guardians
Claude Haiku 4.5
Cleveland Guardians
GPT-4o Mini
Chicago White Sox
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Cleveland Guardians
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
18ef0a1d8c5d7b18…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Jul 5 · 18:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 9872,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-07-05T18:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 05 Jul 2026 18:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Chicago White Sox",
"home": "Cleveland Guardians"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LWWLW",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 24,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 17
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WLLWW",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 24,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 22
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 4,
"home": 4
},
"head_to_head": {
"recent": [
"2026-06-24: Chicago White Sox 3–4 Cleveland Guardians",
"2026-06-23: Chicago White Sox 2–1 Cleveland Guardians",
"2026-06-22: Chicago White Sox 6–5 Cleveland Guardians"
],
"matches": 3
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.