Cleveland GuardiansvsChicago White Sox
Cleveland Guardians 4–3 Chicago White Sox
4 of 7 AIs leaned Cleveland Guardians — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- Cleveland Guardians 4/7
- Correct calls
- 4/7
- Final
- 4–3
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
4 markets · 7 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Cleveland Guardians -1.5 3/7 models |
Cleveland Guardians 4/7 models |
over 4/7 models |
Cleveland Guardians 3/7 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
52%
Cleveland Guardians -1.5
L
|
58%
Cleveland Guardians
W
|
55%
Over 8.5 |
53%
Under 4.5 |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Cleveland Guardians -1.5 Cleveland's home-field edge and recent head-to-head win on 24 Jun provide a slight lean toward a close Guardians victory. Chicago's offensiv...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Cleveland Guardians Cleveland has won 3 of the last 5 matches including the most recent contest on 24 Jun. Despite a balanced 3W-2L record over the last 5, the...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Chicago scored 39 runs in 5 recent matches (7.8 runs/game average), suggesting an offensively potent lineup. Cleveland conceded 20 runs in 5...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Under 4.5 Early-inning scoring tends to be lower than full-game totals. The recent h2h series had low first-five outcomes based on final scores: 4–3 a... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
51%
home_ -1.5 |
62%
Cleveland Guardians
W
|
55%
over
L
|
60%
Cleveland Guardians |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
home_ -1.5 Cleveland is the pick to win by more than one run, but the margin is thin — Gavin Williams should give CLE a chance to build an early lead,...
🔍 researched
8 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Cleveland Guardians Gavin Williams (CLE) is the stronger and more consistent starter in this matchup (season K totals and lower ERA vs Kay), and Cleveland has r...
🔍 researched
8 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown run-scoring ability in this series (5–6 game on July 2) and the White Sox are a top power team in 2026; Kay's higher E...
🔍 researched
8 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
60%
Cleveland Guardians Gavin Williams has a track record of getting through about five innings in recent starts and limiting early damage, while Anthony Kay has ha...
🔍 researched
8 sources cited
|
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Chicago White Sox
L
|
55%
Chicago White Sox
L
|
60%
over
W
|
55%
Chicago White Sox |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Chicago White Sox Given the White Sox's slight advantage in recent form and head-to-head record, they are more likely to cover a -1 spread in this matchup. Th...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago White Sox The Chicago White Sox have a slight edge over the Cleveland Guardians, with a recent head-to-head record of 2 wins and 1 loss in their last...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to score multiple runs in recent games. The White Sox have scored 39 runs in their last 5 games, averaging...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Chicago White Sox The White Sox's recent offensive performance, averaging 7.8 runs per game in their last 5 games, suggests they are likely to score early in...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
49%
Cleveland Guardians -1.5
L
|
53%
Cleveland Guardians
W
|
51%
over |
52%
Cleveland Guardians |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
49%
Cleveland Guardians -1.5 Home edge and pitching depth give Cleveland slight run-line value despite White Sox offensive surge. Recent series went close so spread is t...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Cleveland Guardians Guardians hold home field and showed better recent form balance despite the high-scoring White Sox attack. Recent H2H is split but Cleveland...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over White Sox have averaged nearly 8 runs per game in last 5 while Guardians allow 4 per contest. Both clubs rest 4 days so fresh lineups could...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Cleveland Guardians Guardians lineup has handled White Sox pitching early in prior matchups and home start favors them. Bullpens rested equally so early edge st... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Cleveland Guardians +1.5
W
|
55%
Chicago White Sox
L
|
53%
Over 8.5
L
|
52%
Chicago White Sox |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Cleveland Guardians +1.5 Recent head-to-head matchups between these two teams have been incredibly close, with all three recent games decided by a single run. Even i...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago White Sox The Chicago White Sox show significantly stronger offensive output in their last five games, scoring 39 runs compared to Cleveland's 18, des...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Over 8.5 The White Sox's recent games have been high-scoring, with an average of over 10 combined runs in their last five matches. While the Guardian...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Chicago White Sox The White Sox's superior offensive output in recent games makes them a stronger candidate to hold an early lead or establish one within the... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
52%
Chicago White Sox
L
|
55%
Chicago White Sox
L
|
55%
over
W
|
53%
Chicago White Sox |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Chicago White Sox Given the slight edge in recent form and head-to-head for the Chicago White Sox, they are marginally favored to cover a -1.5 spread. The Gua...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago White Sox The Chicago White Sox have a slightly better recent form with 3 wins in their last 5 games compared to the Cleveland Guardians' 3 wins in th...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over The combined scored and conceded runs in the provided team form (White Sox: 39 scored, 13 conceded; Guardians: 18 scored, 20 conceded) sugge...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Chicago White Sox While starting pitchers are a significant factor in the first five innings, without that data, we rely on overall team form and recent head-... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
47%
Cleveland Guardians -1.5
L
|
58%
Cleveland Guardians
W
|
52%
Under 8.5 |
55%
Cleveland Guardians |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
47%
Cleveland Guardians -1.5 The Guardians are likely to win but may not cover a 1.5-run spread. The White Sox have shown they can be competitive and have the offensive...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Cleveland Guardians The Guardians have home-field advantage and a slight edge in recent head-to-head meetings, including a win in their last encounter. However,...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Under 8.5 Both teams have decent pitching and the Guardians' lineup has been inconsistent. The White Sox's recent high scoring is inflated by a couple...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Cleveland Guardians The Guardians' starting pitcher typically has an advantage, and with 4 days rest, both starters should be sharp. The Guardians have a slight... |
|||||
Spread
ConsensusCleveland Guardians -1.5 3/7
Cleveland's home-field edge and recent head-to-head win on 24 Jun provide a slight lean toward a close Guardians victory. Chicago's offensiv...
Cleveland is the pick to win by more than one run, but the margin is thin — Gavin Williams should give CLE a chance to build an early lead,...
Given the White Sox's slight advantage in recent form and head-to-head record, they are more likely to cover a -1 spread in this matchup. Th...
Home edge and pitching depth give Cleveland slight run-line value despite White Sox offensive surge. Recent series went close so spread is t...
Recent head-to-head matchups between these two teams have been incredibly close, with all three recent games decided by a single run. Even i...
Given the slight edge in recent form and head-to-head for the Chicago White Sox, they are marginally favored to cover a -1.5 spread. The Gua...
The Guardians are likely to win but may not cover a 1.5-run spread. The White Sox have shown they can be competitive and have the offensive...
Match winner
ConsensusCleveland Guardians 4/7
Cleveland has won 3 of the last 5 matches including the most recent contest on 24 Jun. Despite a balanced 3W-2L record over the last 5, the...
Gavin Williams (CLE) is the stronger and more consistent starter in this matchup (season K totals and lower ERA vs Kay), and Cleveland has r...
The Chicago White Sox have a slight edge over the Cleveland Guardians, with a recent head-to-head record of 2 wins and 1 loss in their last...
Guardians hold home field and showed better recent form balance despite the high-scoring White Sox attack. Recent H2H is split but Cleveland...
The Chicago White Sox show significantly stronger offensive output in their last five games, scoring 39 runs compared to Cleveland's 18, des...
The Chicago White Sox have a slightly better recent form with 3 wins in their last 5 games compared to the Cleveland Guardians' 3 wins in th...
The Guardians have home-field advantage and a slight edge in recent head-to-head meetings, including a win in their last encounter. However,...
Over / Under
Consensusover 4/7
Chicago scored 39 runs in 5 recent matches (7.8 runs/game average), suggesting an offensively potent lineup. Cleveland conceded 20 runs in 5...
Both teams have shown run-scoring ability in this series (5–6 game on July 2) and the White Sox are a top power team in 2026; Kay's higher E...
Both teams have shown a tendency to score multiple runs in recent games. The White Sox have scored 39 runs in their last 5 games, averaging...
White Sox have averaged nearly 8 runs per game in last 5 while Guardians allow 4 per contest. Both clubs rest 4 days so fresh lineups could...
The White Sox's recent games have been high-scoring, with an average of over 10 combined runs in their last five matches. While the Guardian...
The combined scored and conceded runs in the provided team form (White Sox: 39 scored, 13 conceded; Guardians: 18 scored, 20 conceded) sugge...
Both teams have decent pitching and the Guardians' lineup has been inconsistent. The White Sox's recent high scoring is inflated by a couple...
First 5 innings
ConsensusCleveland Guardians 3/7
Early-inning scoring tends to be lower than full-game totals. The recent h2h series had low first-five outcomes based on final scores: 4–3 a...
Gavin Williams has a track record of getting through about five innings in recent starts and limiting early damage, while Anthony Kay has ha...
The White Sox's recent offensive performance, averaging 7.8 runs per game in their last 5 games, suggests they are likely to score early in...
Guardians lineup has handled White Sox pitching early in prior matchups and home start favors them. Bullpens rested equally so early edge st...
The White Sox's superior offensive output in recent games makes them a stronger candidate to hold an early lead or establish one within the...
While starting pitchers are a significant factor in the first five innings, without that data, we rely on overall team form and recent head-...
The Guardians' starting pitcher typically has an advantage, and with 4 days rest, both starters should be sharp. The Guardians have a slight...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGPT-5 Mini
Cleveland Guardians
Claude Haiku 4.5
Cleveland Guardians
DeepSeek V3
Cleveland Guardians
GPT-4o Mini
Chicago White Sox
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Chicago White Sox
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Chicago White Sox
Grok 4 Fast
Cleveland Guardians
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
150ffdfcd5edc3e5…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Jul 3 · 23:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 9382,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-07-03T23:10:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 03 Jul 2026 23:10:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Chicago White Sox",
"home": "Cleveland Guardians"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WLWWL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 39,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 13
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LWWLW",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 18,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 20
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 4,
"home": 4
},
"head_to_head": {
"recent": [
"2026-06-24: Chicago White Sox 3–4 Cleveland Guardians",
"2026-06-23: Chicago White Sox 2–1 Cleveland Guardians",
"2026-06-22: Chicago White Sox 6–5 Cleveland Guardians"
],
"matches": 3
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
52 tool calls · 8 sources
8 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.