Clara BurelvsKaterina Tsygourova
KTAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Clara Burel 5/5 models |
under 2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Clara Burel |
62%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Clara Burel Clara Burel is an established WTA player with consistent results on hard courts, while Katerina Tsygourova is a lesser-known competitor with...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Under 2.5 A best-of-three women's tennis match typically favours the stronger player to close out in straight sets if there is a clear skill gap. Give... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
78%
Clara Burel |
65%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Clara Burel Clara Burel holds a significantly higher ranking and more consistent results on the tour than Katerina Tsygourova based on training data thr...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under 2.5 Burel's superior level should produce a straight-sets win in best-of-three format. Tsygourova lacks the weapons to force a deciding set on t... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Clara Burel |
65%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Clara Burel Based on historical data up to my last training update, Clara Burel is a more established player on the WTA circuit than Katerina Tsygourova...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Clara Burel's expected advantage based on general player profiles from training data, a straight-sets victory is the most probable out... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
75%
Clara Burel |
65%
Katerina Tsygourova |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Clara Burel Based on general tennis knowledge up to my last update, Clara Burel is a more established player with a higher career trajectory than Kateri...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Katerina Tsygourova Given Burel's likely advantage, I anticipate she will win in straight sets. Tsygourova may struggle to take a set against a stronger opponen... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
80%
Clara Burel |
75%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
80%
Clara Burel Burel is a more experienced WTA player with higher ranking and better court craft. Tsygourova has limited tour experience at this level. Tra...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
Over 1.5 Given the likely favorite status of Burel, she might win in straight sets, but Tsygourova could push her in at least one set. Women's WTA ma... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusClara Burel 5/5
Clara Burel is an established WTA player with consistent results on hard courts, while Katerina Tsygourova is a lesser-known competitor with...
Clara Burel holds a significantly higher ranking and more consistent results on the tour than Katerina Tsygourova based on training data thr...
Based on historical data up to my last training update, Clara Burel is a more established player on the WTA circuit than Katerina Tsygourova...
Based on general tennis knowledge up to my last update, Clara Burel is a more established player with a higher career trajectory than Kateri...
Burel is a more experienced WTA player with higher ranking and better court craft. Tsygourova has limited tour experience at this level. Tra...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2.5 1/10
A best-of-three women's tennis match typically favours the stronger player to close out in straight sets if there is a clear skill gap. Give...
Burel's superior level should produce a straight-sets win in best-of-three format. Tsygourova lacks the weapons to force a deciding set on t...
Given Clara Burel's expected advantage based on general player profiles from training data, a straight-sets victory is the most probable out...
Given Burel's likely advantage, I anticipate she will win in straight sets. Tsygourova may struggle to take a set against a stronger opponen...
Given the likely favorite status of Burel, she might win in straight sets, but Tsygourova could push her in at least one set. Women's WTA ma...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Clara Burel
Grok 4 Fast
Clara Burel
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Clara Burel
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Clara Burel
Claude Haiku 4.5
Clara Burel
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
30cc511b8f36fdef…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 8 · 11:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39183,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Montreux Nestlé Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-08T10:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 08 Sep 2026 10:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Katerina Tsygourova",
"home": "Clara Burel"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.