Cincinnati RedsvsChicago Cubs
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Cincinnati Reds 2/4 models |
over 2/4 models |
Chicago Cubs 2/4 models |
Cincinnati Reds 2/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
52%
over |
53%
Chicago Cubs |
51%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs Cubs recent form shows more wins and higher scoring output than Reds. Great American Ball Park is hitter-friendly but Cubs lineup has edge i...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both teams scoring at solid clips in last 5 games with combined 41 runs. Ballpark dimensions and late-September warmth favor extra-base hits...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Chicago Cubs Cubs hold better overall record and road form edge. Run-line value leans away given bullpen usage patterns and Reds recent late-game collaps...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
under Starting pitchers control early innings more than full-game totals suggest. Both clubs show lower run rates in first five across recent star... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Cincinnati Reds |
60%
Over 9.5 |
52%
Cincinnati Reds -1.5 |
53%
Cincinnati Reds |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Cincinnati Reds Based on my training data through 2025-09, the Cincinnati Reds typically perform well at home in Great American Ball Park, a venue that ofte...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 9.5 Great American Ball Park is notoriously a hitter's park, which, combined with the Cubs' recent tendency to concede many runs (6.6 per game)...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Cincinnati Reds -1.5 With the Reds favored at home and a potentially high-scoring game, they are more likely to win by multiple runs if they secure an early lead...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Cincinnati Reds Based on my training data through 2025-09, the Reds' projected starting pitcher at home usually offers a slight edge through the early innin... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Chicago Cubs |
55%
over |
58%
Chicago Cubs |
57%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Chicago Cubs The Chicago Cubs have shown better recent form than the Cincinnati Reds, winning more games and scoring more runs in their last five matchup...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over The Great American Ball Park is known for being a hitter-friendly venue, and both teams have shown decent offensive output in their recent g...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Chicago Cubs Given the Cubs' recent form and slightly stronger performance, they are favored to win by more than one run. The Reds' inconsistency, partic...
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
57%
Chicago Cubs The Cubs have demonstrated a tendency to start games strong, with their recent form indicating better early-game performance. Their pitching...
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
52%
Cincinnati Reds |
53%
Over 9.5 |
28%
Cincinnati Reds -1.5 |
51%
Cincinnati Reds |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Cincinnati Reds No live access or bookmaker consensus was available, so this pick is based on training data through 2025-09 and the provided form snapshot....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Over 9.5 Great American Ball Park consistently ranks as one of the most home-run-friendly and higher-scoring venues in MLB, which pushes totals upwar...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
28%
Cincinnati Reds -1.5 Run-line bets are inherently low-probability for the favorite, especially in a near coin-flip game, so the Cubs +1.5 is the safer side. My h...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Cincinnati Reds First-five-innings markets hinge on starting pitchers, and with no confirmed starters available I fall back on the same home-field and recen... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusCincinnati Reds 2/4
Cubs recent form shows more wins and higher scoring output than Reds. Great American Ball Park is hitter-friendly but Cubs lineup has edge i...
Based on my training data through 2025-09, the Cincinnati Reds typically perform well at home in Great American Ball Park, a venue that ofte...
The Chicago Cubs have shown better recent form than the Cincinnati Reds, winning more games and scoring more runs in their last five matchup...
No live access or bookmaker consensus was available, so this pick is based on training data through 2025-09 and the provided form snapshot....
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/4
Both teams scoring at solid clips in last 5 games with combined 41 runs. Ballpark dimensions and late-September warmth favor extra-base hits...
Great American Ball Park is notoriously a hitter's park, which, combined with the Cubs' recent tendency to concede many runs (6.6 per game)...
The Great American Ball Park is known for being a hitter-friendly venue, and both teams have shown decent offensive output in their recent g...
Great American Ball Park consistently ranks as one of the most home-run-friendly and higher-scoring venues in MLB, which pushes totals upwar...
Spread
ConsensusChicago Cubs 2/4
Cubs hold better overall record and road form edge. Run-line value leans away given bullpen usage patterns and Reds recent late-game collaps...
With the Reds favored at home and a potentially high-scoring game, they are more likely to win by multiple runs if they secure an early lead...
Given the Cubs' recent form and slightly stronger performance, they are favored to win by more than one run. The Reds' inconsistency, partic...
Run-line bets are inherently low-probability for the favorite, especially in a near coin-flip game, so the Cubs +1.5 is the safer side. My h...
First 5 innings
ConsensusCincinnati Reds 2/4
Starting pitchers control early innings more than full-game totals suggest. Both clubs show lower run rates in first five across recent star...
Based on my training data through 2025-09, the Reds' projected starting pitcher at home usually offers a slight edge through the early innin...
The Cubs have demonstrated a tendency to start games strong, with their recent form indicating better early-game performance. Their pitching...
First-five-innings markets hinge on starting pitchers, and with no confirmed starters available I fall back on the same home-field and recen...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Chicago Cubs
Grok 4 Fast
Chicago Cubs
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Cincinnati Reds
DeepSeek V3
Cincinnati Reds
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
98cc9cc0da42225e…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Sep 20 · 17:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 44351,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Great American Ball Park",
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-09-20T17:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 20 Sep 2026 17:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Chicago Cubs",
"home": "Cincinnati Reds"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWWLL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 21,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 33
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WLWLL",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 20,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 22
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 73,
"home": 73
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.