Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 0–3
Cincinnati Reds logo

Cincinnati RedsvsBaltimore Orioles

Baltimore Orioles logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final0–3 Locked 28picks · 18 graded AIs split
Recap Consensus missed

Cincinnati Reds 0–3 Baltimore Orioles

4 of 7 AIs leaned Cincinnati Reds — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
Cincinnati Reds 4/7
Correct calls
3/7
Final
0–3

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
Cincinnati Reds -1.5 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Cincinnati Reds -1.5 L

Cincinnati's home-field advantage combined with better recent form (2-3 vs 1-4) supports a modest spread in their favor. Baltimore's 4-day r...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 45% Baltimore Orioles -1.5 W

The Orioles are the stronger pick head-to-head but a -1.5 (win by 2+) requires both Rogers to get through the lineup effectively and the bul...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Baltimore Orioles W

The Orioles' overall performance and road success give them a slight edge to cover the spread. Their offense and pitching staff have been mo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Cincinnati Reds -1.5 L

Reds hold a slight edge at home with better recent results and shorter rest cycle. Orioles' poor road form makes the run line lean toward Ci...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Cincinnati Reds -1.5 L

Given the Cincinnati Reds are the home team and have shown slightly better offensive production in their recent form, I am backing them to c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Baltimore Orioles W

Considering the Orioles' historical head-to-head advantage and their general performance trends in my training data, they are slightly favor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 40% Cincinnati Reds -1.5 L

The Reds are expected to win but not by a large margin; their recent games have been close. The Orioles have a solid bullpen that could keep...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Under 8.5

Both teams are performing defensively and offensively below average in recent form: Cincinnati conceded 31 runs over 5 matches (6.2/game) wh...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% over L

Both probable starters carry season ERAs north of 4.5 but have shown recent spikes in quality (Rogers) and bounceback starts (Singer), and G...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over W

Both teams have been involved in games with high run totals recently. The Orioles have a higher average runs scored per game, and the Reds h...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Both teams have allowed high run totals in the supplied form data (26 and 31 conceded). Outdoor venue and typical July conditions favor elev...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Over 8.5 L

Assuming a standard MLB total line of 8.5 runs, both teams have been involved in relatively higher-scoring affairs recently, with a combined...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over L

Based on general MLB run-scoring averages and the offensive and defensive tendencies of both teams as reflected in my training data, a total...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Over 8.5

Both teams have shown above-average scoring recently, with the Reds averaging 5.4 runs and the Orioles 3.6. The ballpark in Cincinnati is sl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited

Match winner

Consensus
Cincinnati Reds 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Cincinnati Reds L

Cincinnati is favored at home with superior recent form (2-3 vs Baltimore's 1-4 in last 5), better run differential (-4 vs -8), and an extra...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% Baltimore Orioles W

Trevor Rogers has come into better form (including a one-hit, seven-inning performance on June 21 and a strong June ERA), while Brady Singer...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Baltimore Orioles W

The Orioles have a slightly better overall record and have been more successful on the road this season. Their offense has been more consist...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Cincinnati Reds L

Home Reds show a marginally better recent record (2-3 vs 1-4) and benefit from three rest days compared to Baltimore's four. Orioles have be...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Cincinnati Reds L

Based on the provided recent form, the Cincinnati Reds have a slightly better offensive output and a marginal winning record compared to the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Baltimore Orioles W

The Baltimore Orioles have a historical advantage in head-to-head matchups against the Cincinnati Reds. While current starting pitcher match...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% Cincinnati Reds L

The Reds have a slightly better home record and recent offensive output, averaging over 5 runs per game in their last five, while the Oriole...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited

First 5 innings

Consensus
Cincinnati Reds 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Under 4.5

The first five innings typically see lower scoring than full games due to starting-pitcher strength and bullpen freshness. Baltimore's recen...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 53% Baltimore Orioles

Rogers has shown the ability to dominate early (retiring long stretches and relying on a heavy fastball plan), which increases Baltimore's c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Baltimore Orioles

The Orioles have shown a tendency to start games strong, with a higher average runs scored in the first five innings compared to the Reds. T...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Cincinnati Reds

Home side typically controls early innings when rested; Orioles' recent losing skid suggests slow starts. Limited rest differential favors C...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Cincinnati Reds

The first five innings market is highly dependent on the starting pitching matchup, which is unavailable for this future date. However, base...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Baltimore Orioles

The Baltimore Orioles' historical performance and general team strength, as understood from my training data, suggest they are slightly more...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Cincinnati Reds

The Reds' starting pitcher has been strong in the first five innings, with a sub-3.50 ERA in that span. The Orioles' starter has been incons...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Cincinnati Reds

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Cincinnati Reds

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Baltimore Orioles

57
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Baltimore Orioles

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Cincinnati Reds

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Baltimore Orioles

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Cincinnati Reds

54

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1097–1132 · 49%
-823.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 77fc1d9c1322b70e…
Kickoff
Fri, Jul 3 · 23:10 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 9383,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-03T23:10:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Fri, 03 Jul 2026 23:10:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Baltimore Orioles",
        "home": "Cincinnati Reds"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LLLWL",
            "record": "1W-0D-4L",
            "scored": 18,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 26
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LLWWL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 27,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 31
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 4,
            "home": 3
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →