Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Rate Field
Upcoming · in 87h 11m
Chicago White Sox logo

Chicago White SoxvsTexas Rangers

Texas Rangers logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Texas Rangers 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Texas Rangers

Both teams are in poor form (2-3 over last 5), but Texas has scored 22 runs vs Chicago's 14 in the same span, indicating better offensive ou...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Texas Rangers

Texas projects as the stronger side here based on roster-level starting pitching depth (Jacob deGrom listed on the Rangers roster and Texas'...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Texas Rangers

The Texas Rangers have a slightly better overall record and have been more successful on the road this season. Their recent form, with a 4-6...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 57% Texas Rangers

Rangers enter as the stronger roster based on pre-2026 talent evaluation while White Sox continue to rebuild. Both clubs show similar 2-3 re...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Texas Rangers

Based on my training data through early 2025, the Texas Rangers typically possess a slightly more potent offense than the Chicago White Sox....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Texas Rangers

The Texas Rangers have a slight edge due to better recent performance and a marginally stronger lineup against right-handed pitching, which...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Texas Rangers

Based on training data through 2025-09, the Rangers have shown better offensive output recently (22 runs in their last 5) compared to the Wh...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Under 8.5

Combined form shows both offenses struggling: Chicago scored 14 runs in 5 games (2.8 per game), Texas 22 in 5 games (4.4 per game), for an a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% over

Both clubs' recent 5-game data show elevated runs allowed and conceded (user brief shows both teams conceding heavy runs in short sample), a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over

Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities this season, with the Rangers averaging 4.1 runs per game and the White Sox averaging...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Rate Field plays neutral to slightly hitter-friendly in late August. Both lineups project average offense and the supplied rest days suggest...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Over 8.5

Rate Field is generally considered a hitter-friendly ballpark, which can contribute to higher scoring games. The Texas Rangers' recent match...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over

Both teams have shown a tendency to concede runs recently, and the ballpark in Chicago, while not a hitter's park, does not heavily suppress...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 53% over

Both teams have allowed 24+ runs in their last 5 games, indicating pitching struggles. The ballpark factors and wind direction, if known, co...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Texas Rangers 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Texas Rangers -1.5

Texas has demonstrated superior offensive depth (22 runs scored vs 14) and slightly better run differential despite identical win-loss recor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% Texas Rangers

Given the roster-level advantage in starting pitching depth for Texas and their superior run creation profile, I lean to the Rangers coverin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Texas Rangers

The Rangers' slight edge in overall performance and away games suggests they are more likely to cover a -1 spread. The game is expected to b...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Texas Rangers

Rangers hold the talent edge and should cover a standard run-line spread. White Sox recent form shows defensive issues that allow extra runs...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% Texas Rangers +1.5

Given the expected closeness of this game, where neither team presents a significant dominance based on recent form, taking the underdog on...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Texas Rangers

Given the slight edge in projected run support and bullpen strength for the Rangers, they are slightly more favored to cover a -1.5 spread....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Texas Rangers

The Rangers have a slight edge in recent form and run differential. The run line of +1.5 for the away team is plausible given their offensiv...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Texas Rangers 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Under 4.5

Early-inning scoring tends to lag total-game scoring, especially when both offenses are underperforming. Chicago and Texas have combined for...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 53% Texas Rangers

The first-five innings lean to Texas because their projected starting depth (roster evidence) implies a better chance of an early lead or at...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Texas Rangers

The Rangers' away performance and overall record suggest they are more likely to lead after the first five innings. The game is expected to...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Texas Rangers

Starting-pitcher advantage leans toward Texas in the first five frames. White Sox home offense has been slow to score early in recent season...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 45% Texas Rangers

Aligning with the full-game H2H prediction, the Texas Rangers are expected to hold a slight advantage in the early innings. Their perceived...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% Texas Rangers

The Rangers' projected starting pitcher is expected to perform better against the White Sox's lineup in the early innings. Their offense als...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 54% Texas Rangers

In the first five innings, the starting pitcher has the most influence. The Rangers' starters have been more consistent in limiting runs. Th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Texas Rangers

62
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Texas Rangers

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Texas Rangers

57
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Texas Rangers

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Texas Rangers

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Texas Rangers

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Texas Rangers

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1151–929 · 55%
-732.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 694–590 · 54%
-369.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1228–1245 · 50%
-1,059.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 851–876 · 49%
-634.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1225–1281 · 49%
-972.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 977–1065 · 48%
-863.8u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 05b0efe37a9274e7…
Kickoff
Mon, Aug 24 · 23:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 28395,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Rate Field",
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-24T23:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 23:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Texas Rangers",
        "home": "Chicago White Sox"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LWLLW",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 22,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 29
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LLWWL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 14,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 24
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 46,
            "home": 47
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →