Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Rate Field
Upcoming · in 87h 26m
Chicago White Sox logo

Chicago White SoxvsNew York Mets

New York Mets logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Over 8.5

The Mets have been prolific (7.6 runs/game in last 5), and while the White Sox are anemic offensively, their pitching has also been leaky (4...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% under

Park and weather point toward suppressed carry: Guaranteed Rate Field is not a hitter's paradise (deeper alleys and historically neutral-to-...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have shown inconsistent offensive performances, with the Mets averaging 4.1 runs per game and the White Sox averaging 4.8 runs pe...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% over

Rate Field plays neutral to slightly hitter-friendly in August with typical warm conditions. Both bullpens show signs of fatigue after exten...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Over 8.5

The New York Mets' recent games have been high-scoring affairs, with 38 runs scored and 47 conceded in 5 games (an average combined 17 runs...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over

Both teams have shown offensive potential in their recent games, and the combined recent scoring averages suggest a higher-scoring affair. T...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% over

Assuming typical MLB run environments and the historical tendency for games to go over 8.5 runs, the over is a reasonable lean, but I cannot...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
New York Mets 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% New York Mets

The Mets are in stronger recent form (3W-2L vs 2W-3L for the White Sox) and have outscored their opponents significantly over the last 5 mat...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% New York Mets

Official probable starters for Aug 21 had not been locked/posted by team pages at the time of research, so this moneyline is driven by roste...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% New York Mets

The Mets have a slightly better away record (22-32) compared to the White Sox's home record (23-30). Additionally, the Mets have shown bette...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% New York Mets

Mets enter with superior offensive output and a stronger overall roster compared to the White Sox. Home side has posted just 14 runs over th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% New York Mets

Based on the provided recent form from my training data, the New York Mets have a better record (3W-2L) and significantly higher scoring out...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% New York Mets

The Mets have shown better recent form, particularly in scoring runs, compared to the White Sox. While the White Sox have a home-field advan...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Chicago White Sox

This is a mid-August 2026 matchup between the Mets and White Sox at Rate Field, but due to the training data cutoff (September 2025), I cann...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
New York Mets 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Mets -1.5

The Mets' 3-2 record and strong run differential (38 scored, 47 conceded = -9 net but plays as offensive upside) versus the White Sox's 2-3...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 48% New York Mets -1.5

Run-line (away -1.5) is close to a coin flip given the uncertainty around announced starters; the Mets are slightly likelier to win straight...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% New York Mets

Considering the Mets' slightly better away record and recent form, they are more likely to cover the -1 spread in this matchup.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% New York Mets

Mets hold the edge in run differential and pitching depth. White Sox have allowed 24 runs in their last five while scoring only 14. Spread v...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% New York Mets -1.5

The Mets' stronger offensive output and better recent win-loss record (3 wins in 5 games) suggest they have the capability to win by more th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% away_ 1.5

Given the slightly favored status of the Mets in head-to-head and the expectation of a moderately high-scoring game, covering a 1.5 run spre...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% away_ +1.5

Even if the White Sox win, the Mets are generally a competitive team, and a one-run margin is common in MLB. Taking the Mets +1.5 is a safer...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
New York Mets 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 51% Over 4.5

Early-inning scoring is driven by starter quality and lineup strength. The Mets' offensive prowess (7.6 rpg) and the White Sox's weak pitchi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 53% New York Mets

First-five innings are most dependent on the starting pitchers; because official probables were not posted on the team/MLB pages at time of...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% New York Mets

The Mets have shown a slight edge in recent form, which may translate to a better performance in the first five innings. However, the differ...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% New York Mets

Early innings favor the Mets due to their stronger top-of-order production against weaker home starters. White Sox lineup has struggled to s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 56% New York Mets

The first five innings heavily rely on starting pitching and early offensive execution. Given the Mets' superior offensive form and higher r...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% New York Mets

The Mets have demonstrated a stronger ability to score early in games based on recent form. Their offense has been more consistent than the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 50% New York Mets

Based on general tendencies, the Mets have a stronger lineup and better starting pitching rotation historically, which often gives them an e...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

New York Mets

62
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

New York Mets

60
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

New York Mets

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

New York Mets

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

New York Mets

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

New York Mets

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Chicago White Sox

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1058–806 · 57%
-609.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 694–590 · 54%
-369.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1132–1113 · 50%
-927.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 743–746 · 50%
-504.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1109–1141 · 49%
-832.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 878–934 · 48%
-732.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 754a77067f7e6db1…
Kickoff
Fri, Aug 21 · 23:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 27480,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Rate Field",
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-21T23:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Fri, 21 Aug 2026 23:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "New York Mets",
        "home": "Chicago White Sox"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "WLWWL",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 38,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 47
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LLWWL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 14,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 24
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 44,
            "home": 44
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →