Chicago White SoxvsMinnesota Twins
AI predictions
4 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Minnesota Twins 5/5 models |
Over 8.5 1/5 models |
Minnesota Twins -1.5 3/5 models |
Minnesota Twins 4/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Minnesota Twins |
56%
Over 8.5 |
54%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Minnesota Twins Minnesota enters on a 4-1 streak with strong offensive output (28 runs in 5 games) and disciplined pitching (16 runs allowed), while Chicago...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
56%
Over 8.5 Minnesota has averaged 5.6 runs per game (28 in 5 matches) and Chicago 2.8 runs per game (14 in 5 matches), totaling 8.4 runs per contest in...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Minnesota's 4-1 form and +12 run differential over 5 games suggest they are winning closer to 2 runs per contest on average, which aligns wi...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
58%
Minnesota Twins The Twins' strong offensive form (5.6 RPG average, 4-1 streak) and Chicago's weak defensive posture in recent games (allowing 4.8 runs per g... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
under |
58%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
59%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Minnesota Twins Twins hold superior roster talent and recent form edge over a rebuilding White Sox club. Training data through 2025-09 indicates Minnesota t...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under Projected starters and bullpens point to a lower-scoring affair in a neutral-to-pitcher-friendly park. Training data through 2025-09 shows T...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Minnesota's pitching depth gives them a solid edge to win by two or more runs. Historical results in this series favor the Twins covering th...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
59%
Minnesota Twins Early-game advantage leans to the Twins given stronger starting pitching matchup. Training data through 2025-09 shows Minnesota often builds... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Minnesota Twins |
58%
Under 8.5 |
60%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
62%
Minnesota Twins lead |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Minnesota Twins Based on the recent form provided, the Minnesota Twins show a significantly stronger performance (4W-1L, +12 run differential) compared to t...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 8.5 While the Twins possess a strong offense (averaging 5.6 RPG), the White Sox have struggled significantly to score runs (2.8 RPG). The Twins...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 The Twins' recent record of winning games with a positive run differential (+12 over 5 games) indicates their capability to cover a standard...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
62%
Minnesota Twins lead The Twins' strong offensive form suggests they will be able to score early runs against the White Sox's likely weaker starting pitching. Cou... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
53%
over |
51%
Minnesota Twins |
54%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins The Twins have a historical edge over the White Sox, and their recent form, despite a recent loss, shows more offensive power than the White...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over While both teams have had some struggles, the Twins' offense has shown more consistent scoring capability. The weather forecast suggests fav...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Minnesota Twins Given the slight historical edge and more potent offense of the Twins, they are favored to cover a small spread. The White Sox's recent stru...
3 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Minnesota Twins The Twins' offense has been more consistent, and assuming their lineup performs adequately against the White Sox's pitching early on, they a...
3 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Over 2.5 |
48%
Minnesota Twins -1 |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Minnesota Twins Based on training data through 2025-09, Minnesota has been consistently competitive with strong offensive depth, while Chicago has been rebu...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Both teams' recent games have seen moderate scoring, with the total runs in their combined last five games averaging over 8 runs per game. R...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
Minnesota Twins -1 Minnesota is favored, but the White Sox can compete in divisional games. While the Twins are better, run-line covers are never guaranteed. W...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Minnesota Twins Starting pitcher advantage favors the Twins based on overall roster depth and typical performance. Early innings often see the stronger line... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 5/5
Minnesota enters on a 4-1 streak with strong offensive output (28 runs in 5 games) and disciplined pitching (16 runs allowed), while Chicago...
Twins hold superior roster talent and recent form edge over a rebuilding White Sox club. Training data through 2025-09 indicates Minnesota t...
Based on the recent form provided, the Minnesota Twins show a significantly stronger performance (4W-1L, +12 run differential) compared to t...
The Twins have a historical edge over the White Sox, and their recent form, despite a recent loss, shows more offensive power than the White...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Minnesota has been consistently competitive with strong offensive depth, while Chicago has been rebu...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 8.5 1/5
Minnesota has averaged 5.6 runs per game (28 in 5 matches) and Chicago 2.8 runs per game (14 in 5 matches), totaling 8.4 runs per contest in...
Projected starters and bullpens point to a lower-scoring affair in a neutral-to-pitcher-friendly park. Training data through 2025-09 shows T...
While the Twins possess a strong offense (averaging 5.6 RPG), the White Sox have struggled significantly to score runs (2.8 RPG). The Twins...
While both teams have had some struggles, the Twins' offense has shown more consistent scoring capability. The weather forecast suggests fav...
Both teams' recent games have seen moderate scoring, with the total runs in their combined last five games averaging over 8 runs per game. R...
Spread
ConsensusMinnesota Twins -1.5 3/5
Minnesota's 4-1 form and +12 run differential over 5 games suggest they are winning closer to 2 runs per contest on average, which aligns wi...
Minnesota's pitching depth gives them a solid edge to win by two or more runs. Historical results in this series favor the Twins covering th...
The Twins' recent record of winning games with a positive run differential (+12 over 5 games) indicates their capability to cover a standard...
Given the slight historical edge and more potent offense of the Twins, they are favored to cover a small spread. The White Sox's recent stru...
Minnesota is favored, but the White Sox can compete in divisional games. While the Twins are better, run-line covers are never guaranteed. W...
First 5 innings
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 4/5
The Twins' strong offensive form (5.6 RPG average, 4-1 streak) and Chicago's weak defensive posture in recent games (allowing 4.8 runs per g...
Early-game advantage leans to the Twins given stronger starting pitching matchup. Training data through 2025-09 shows Minnesota often builds...
The Twins' strong offensive form suggests they will be able to score early runs against the White Sox's likely weaker starting pitching. Cou...
The Twins' offense has been more consistent, and assuming their lineup performs adequately against the White Sox's pitching early on, they a...
Starting pitcher advantage favors the Twins based on overall roster depth and typical performance. Early innings often see the stronger line...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Minnesota Twins
Claude Haiku 4.5
Minnesota Twins
Grok 4 Fast
Minnesota Twins
DeepSeek V3
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Minnesota Twins
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
f8227f59654e44b3…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Sep 6 · 22:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35675,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Rate Field",
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-09-06T22:20:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 06 Sep 2026 22:20:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Minnesota Twins",
"home": "Chicago White Sox"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWWWL",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 28,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 16
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LLWWL",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 14,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 24
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 59,
"home": 59
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.