Chicago White SoxvsMinnesota Twins
AI predictions
5 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First five innings ml
?
First five innings ml
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Minnesota Twins 4/4 models |
Minnesota Twins 5/5 models |
over 3/5 models |
Minnesota Twins -1.5 3/5 models |
Minnesota Twins 1/1 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
59%
Minnesota Twins |
62%
Minnesota Twins |
58%
Over 8.5 |
54%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
59%
Minnesota Twins Early-game strength typically reflects lineup quality and starter confidence. Minnesota's recent offensive surge and superior form suggest t...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Minnesota Twins Minnesota arrives with strong recent form (4W-1L over last 5) and a +12 run differential, while Chicago is struggling (2W-3L, -10 differenti...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 8.5 Minnesota has scored 28 runs in last 5 games (5.6 per game) and Chicago has allowed 24 runs over the same span (4.8 per game). The Twins' ho...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 The Twins' strong form (4-1) and run differential advantage make them slight favorites to win by 2+ runs. However, the spread reflects the W...
First five innings ml
?
First five innings ml
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First five innings ml
?
First five innings ml
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First five innings ml
?
First five innings ml
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Minnesota Twins |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
53%
over |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Minnesota Twins Twins stronger overall lineup should carry an edge early before bullpens factor in. Home side's recent defensive struggles extend to early i...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Minnesota Twins Twins enter with superior recent form (WWWWL, +12 run differential) versus White Sox (LLWWL, -10). Rate Field favors the better offense and...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Both offenses have produced runs recently and the Twins especially have been scoring at a high clip. White Sox pitching has allowed 24 runs...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Minnesota Twins Twins superior run differential and form point to covering a modest run line on the road. White Sox have conceded far more runs lately. Trai...
First five innings ml
?
First five innings ml
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
— |
60%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Under 8.5 |
55%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
50%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Minnesota Twins Based on the provided recent form, the Minnesota Twins have shown significantly stronger offensive and defensive performance. This suggests...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 8.5 While the Twins' offense is strong (5.6 runs/game), the White Sox's scoring has been very low (2.8 runs/game), balancing the overall run exp...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 The Twins' superior recent form, marked by higher scoring and lower concession, indicates a strong likelihood of winning by at least two run...
First five innings ml
?
First five innings ml
Market explanation coming soon.
50%
Minnesota Twins The Twins' strong offensive performance and the White Sox's struggles in conceding runs suggest the Twins are more likely to hold a lead aft... |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
56%
Minnesota Twins |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
over |
53%
away_ 1.5 |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
56%
Minnesota Twins The Twins have shown a stronger ability to start games well, reflected in their recent winning streaks. The White Sox's tendency to concede...
4 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins are in better recent form, and the Chicago White Sox have struggled with a high number of conceded runs. While both team...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over The White Sox have conceded a high number of runs recently, suggesting potential defensive weaknesses. The Twins have a potent offense. Comb...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
away_ 1.5 Given the Twins' stronger form and the White Sox's struggles, the Twins are favored to win by more than one run. The White Sox's high run co...
4 sources cited
First five innings ml
?
First five innings ml
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
60%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
over |
50%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Minnesota Twins Training data through 2025-09: The Twins' starting pitching is generally better than the White Sox's, and the first five innings give the ad...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Minnesota Twins Training data through 2025-09: The Twins have a much better roster and have historically dominated the White Sox, who are in a rebuild. The...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Training data through 2025-09: The Twins have a potent offense, and the White Sox bullpen has been weak, leading to high-scoring games. Rate...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Training data through 2025-09: The Twins are significantly better, but run-line spreads in baseball are volatile. A -1.5 run line requires a...
First five innings ml
?
First five innings ml
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
First 5 innings
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 4/4
Early-game strength typically reflects lineup quality and starter confidence. Minnesota's recent offensive surge and superior form suggest t...
Twins stronger overall lineup should carry an edge early before bullpens factor in. Home side's recent defensive struggles extend to early i...
The Twins have shown a stronger ability to start games well, reflected in their recent winning streaks. The White Sox's tendency to concede...
Training data through 2025-09: The Twins' starting pitching is generally better than the White Sox's, and the first five innings give the ad...
Match winner
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 5/5
Minnesota arrives with strong recent form (4W-1L over last 5) and a +12 run differential, while Chicago is struggling (2W-3L, -10 differenti...
Twins enter with superior recent form (WWWWL, +12 run differential) versus White Sox (LLWWL, -10). Rate Field favors the better offense and...
Based on the provided recent form, the Minnesota Twins have shown significantly stronger offensive and defensive performance. This suggests...
The Minnesota Twins are in better recent form, and the Chicago White Sox have struggled with a high number of conceded runs. While both team...
Training data through 2025-09: The Twins have a much better roster and have historically dominated the White Sox, who are in a rebuild. The...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/5
Minnesota has scored 28 runs in last 5 games (5.6 per game) and Chicago has allowed 24 runs over the same span (4.8 per game). The Twins' ho...
Both offenses have produced runs recently and the Twins especially have been scoring at a high clip. White Sox pitching has allowed 24 runs...
While the Twins' offense is strong (5.6 runs/game), the White Sox's scoring has been very low (2.8 runs/game), balancing the overall run exp...
The White Sox have conceded a high number of runs recently, suggesting potential defensive weaknesses. The Twins have a potent offense. Comb...
Training data through 2025-09: The Twins have a potent offense, and the White Sox bullpen has been weak, leading to high-scoring games. Rate...
Spread
ConsensusMinnesota Twins -1.5 3/5
The Twins' strong form (4-1) and run differential advantage make them slight favorites to win by 2+ runs. However, the spread reflects the W...
Twins superior run differential and form point to covering a modest run line on the road. White Sox have conceded far more runs lately. Trai...
The Twins' superior recent form, marked by higher scoring and lower concession, indicates a strong likelihood of winning by at least two run...
Given the Twins' stronger form and the White Sox's struggles, the Twins are favored to win by more than one run. The White Sox's high run co...
Training data through 2025-09: The Twins are significantly better, but run-line spreads in baseball are volatile. A -1.5 run line requires a...
First five innings ml
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 1/1
The Twins' strong offensive performance and the White Sox's struggles in conceding runs suggest the Twins are more likely to hold a lead aft...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Minnesota Twins
DeepSeek V3
Minnesota Twins
Grok 4 Fast
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Minnesota Twins
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
9d8e2c7a4a255b32…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Sep 4 · 23:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35158,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Rate Field",
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-09-04T23:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Minnesota Twins",
"home": "Chicago White Sox"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWWWL",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 28,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 16
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LLWWL",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 14,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 24
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 58,
"home": 58
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.