Chicago White SoxvsCleveland Guardians
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 7 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Cleveland Guardians 4/7 models |
over 3/7 models |
Cleveland Guardians 2/7 models |
Cleveland Guardians 3/7 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Chicago White Sox |
55%
Under 8.5 |
56%
Chicago White Sox -1 |
54%
Under 4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Chicago White Sox The White Sox have won 3 of the last 5 head-to-head matchups and show slightly better recent form (2W-3L vs 1W-4L over the last 5 matches)....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 8.5 Over the last 5 matches, the White Sox averaged 2.8 runs per game and conceded 4.8 runs per game. Cleveland averaged 3.4 runs scored and 4.4...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
56%
Chicago White Sox -1 The White Sox' 3-of-5 recent H2H wins and home-field advantage suggest they are slight favorites to cover a 1-run spread. Chicago's form (2W...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Under 4.5 Early-inning play is typically more suppressed than full-game totals because offenses are still acclimating to the opposing starter and reli... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
56%
Cleveland Guardians |
62%
under |
60%
Chicago White Sox +1.5 |
52%
Cleveland Guardians |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
56%
Cleveland Guardians Probable starters (Gavin Williams for CLE vs Davis Martin for CHW) point to a pitchers' duel but Gavin Williams has delivered higher recent...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under Both probable starters profile as pitchers who induce swings-and-misses and have had quality starts lately, while Guaranteed Rate Field and...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Chicago White Sox +1.5 While I slightly favor Cleveland to win outright, the game projects to be tight; a +1.5 White Sox cover is the safer play because the White...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Cleveland Guardians Gavin Williams' strong early-inning K upside increases Cleveland's chance to lead through five innings, whereas Davis Martin tends to eat in...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
|
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Cleveland Guardians |
60%
over |
55%
Cleveland Guardians |
55%
Cleveland Guardians |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Cleveland Guardians The Cleveland Guardians have shown a slight edge in recent head-to-head matchups, winning 3 out of the last 5 games against the Chicago Whit...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have demonstrated a tendency to score multiple runs in recent games, with the Guardians averaging 4.2 runs per game and the White...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Cleveland Guardians Given the Guardians' slight edge in recent head-to-head matchups and their stronger overall season record, they are more likely to cover the...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Cleveland Guardians The Guardians have shown a tendency to start games strong, with an average of 2.0 runs in the first five innings over their last 5 games. Th...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Chicago White Sox |
52%
over |
51%
home_ -1.5 |
51%
Chicago White Sox |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Chicago White Sox White Sox own a 2-3 record in their last five while hosting a Guardians club on a 1-4 skid. Recent head-to-head shows Chicago taking two of...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both offenses have allowed 22+ runs in their last five games each. Rate Field tends to play neutral to hitter-friendly in August with typica...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
home_ -1.5 White Sox have covered the run line in two of their last three home outings. Cleveland's recent form shows defensive lapses that allow multi...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Chicago White Sox Chicago's starters have kept early innings close at home this season per historical splits. Guardians have scored just 17 runs across their... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Chicago White Sox |
53%
Under 8.5 |
54%
Cleveland Guardians +1.5 |
51%
Chicago White Sox |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Chicago White Sox This game is scheduled for the future (2026-08-07), so predictions are based on general MLB knowledge and the provided historical data throu...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Under 8.5 Due to the future date, I am using my training data and general MLB principles, assuming a standard total line of 8.5 runs. Both teams have...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
Cleveland Guardians +1.5 As this game is in the future, my analysis relies on general MLB knowledge and the provided context, assuming a typical run line of -1.5. Gi...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Chicago White Sox This prediction is made using my training data due to the future nature of the game. Without specific starting pitcher information, I'm assu... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Cleveland Guardians |
60%
over |
55%
Cleveland Guardians |
53%
Cleveland Guardians |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Cleveland Guardians The Cleveland Guardians have shown slightly better recent form with a 1-4 record compared to the Chicago White Sox's 2-3, although both team...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Given the offensive struggles of both teams, as indicated by their low scoring in recent matches, and the uncertainty of the starting pitche...
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Cleveland Guardians The spread of -1 generally implies a favored team. Based on the head-to-head and slight edge in recent form, the Cleveland Guardians are mar...
2 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Cleveland Guardians Predicting the outcome of the first five innings is highly dependent on the starting pitchers, which are not available. However, given the G...
2 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Cleveland Guardians |
70%
Over 2.5 |
60%
Chicago White Sox +1.5 |
60%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Cleveland Guardians Based on training data through 2025-09, the Guardians have historically been the stronger team, though they are in poor form recently. The W...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 2.5 Baseball games typically have more than 2.5 total runs, and both teams have shown ability to score, combining for 31 runs in their last 5 ga...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Chicago White Sox +1.5 The Guardians are struggling, while the White Sox have been competitive at home. Given the tight H2H contests, taking the White Sox with +1....
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
60%
Over 2.5 In the first five innings, starting pitchers are typically less fatigued, but both teams' offenses have been active. The Guardians and White... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusCleveland Guardians 4/7
The White Sox have won 3 of the last 5 head-to-head matchups and show slightly better recent form (2W-3L vs 1W-4L over the last 5 matches)....
Probable starters (Gavin Williams for CLE vs Davis Martin for CHW) point to a pitchers' duel but Gavin Williams has delivered higher recent...
The Cleveland Guardians have shown a slight edge in recent head-to-head matchups, winning 3 out of the last 5 games against the Chicago Whit...
White Sox own a 2-3 record in their last five while hosting a Guardians club on a 1-4 skid. Recent head-to-head shows Chicago taking two of...
This game is scheduled for the future (2026-08-07), so predictions are based on general MLB knowledge and the provided historical data throu...
The Cleveland Guardians have shown slightly better recent form with a 1-4 record compared to the Chicago White Sox's 2-3, although both team...
Based on training data through 2025-09, the Guardians have historically been the stronger team, though they are in poor form recently. The W...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/7
Over the last 5 matches, the White Sox averaged 2.8 runs per game and conceded 4.8 runs per game. Cleveland averaged 3.4 runs scored and 4.4...
Both probable starters profile as pitchers who induce swings-and-misses and have had quality starts lately, while Guaranteed Rate Field and...
Both teams have demonstrated a tendency to score multiple runs in recent games, with the Guardians averaging 4.2 runs per game and the White...
Both offenses have allowed 22+ runs in their last five games each. Rate Field tends to play neutral to hitter-friendly in August with typica...
Due to the future date, I am using my training data and general MLB principles, assuming a standard total line of 8.5 runs. Both teams have...
Given the offensive struggles of both teams, as indicated by their low scoring in recent matches, and the uncertainty of the starting pitche...
Baseball games typically have more than 2.5 total runs, and both teams have shown ability to score, combining for 31 runs in their last 5 ga...
Spread
ConsensusCleveland Guardians 2/7
The White Sox' 3-of-5 recent H2H wins and home-field advantage suggest they are slight favorites to cover a 1-run spread. Chicago's form (2W...
While I slightly favor Cleveland to win outright, the game projects to be tight; a +1.5 White Sox cover is the safer play because the White...
Given the Guardians' slight edge in recent head-to-head matchups and their stronger overall season record, they are more likely to cover the...
White Sox have covered the run line in two of their last three home outings. Cleveland's recent form shows defensive lapses that allow multi...
As this game is in the future, my analysis relies on general MLB knowledge and the provided context, assuming a typical run line of -1.5. Gi...
The spread of -1 generally implies a favored team. Based on the head-to-head and slight edge in recent form, the Cleveland Guardians are mar...
The Guardians are struggling, while the White Sox have been competitive at home. Given the tight H2H contests, taking the White Sox with +1....
First 5 innings
ConsensusCleveland Guardians 3/7
Early-inning play is typically more suppressed than full-game totals because offenses are still acclimating to the opposing starter and reli...
Gavin Williams' strong early-inning K upside increases Cleveland's chance to lead through five innings, whereas Davis Martin tends to eat in...
The Guardians have shown a tendency to start games strong, with an average of 2.0 runs in the first five innings over their last 5 games. Th...
Chicago's starters have kept early innings close at home this season per historical splits. Guardians have scored just 17 runs across their...
This prediction is made using my training data due to the future nature of the game. Without specific starting pitcher information, I'm assu...
Predicting the outcome of the first five innings is highly dependent on the starting pitchers, which are not available. However, given the G...
In the first five innings, starting pitchers are typically less fatigued, but both teams' offenses have been active. The Guardians and White...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Chicago White Sox
GPT-5 Mini
Cleveland Guardians
GPT-4o Mini
Cleveland Guardians
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Cleveland Guardians
DeepSeek V3
Cleveland Guardians
Grok 4 Fast
Chicago White Sox
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Chicago White Sox
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
0c5f6e1459b669d1…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Aug 7 · 23:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 21155,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Rate Field",
"league": "Major League Baseball",
"starts_at": "2026-08-07T23:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 07 Aug 2026 23:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Cleveland Guardians",
"home": "Chicago White Sox"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LLLLW",
"record": "1W-0D-4L",
"scored": 17,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 22
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LLWWL",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 14,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 24
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 30,
"home": 30
},
"head_to_head": {
"recent": [
"2026-07-05: Cleveland Guardians 6–7 Chicago White Sox",
"2026-07-04: Cleveland Guardians 1–3 Chicago White Sox",
"2026-07-03: Cleveland Guardians 4–3 Chicago White Sox",
"2026-07-02: Cleveland Guardians 6–5 Chicago White Sox",
"2026-06-24: Chicago White Sox 3–4 Cleveland Guardians"
],
"matches": 5
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
4 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
36 tool calls · 6 sources
6 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.