Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Upcoming · in 88h 01m
Chicago White Sox logo

Chicago White SoxvsAthletics

Athletics logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks AIs split

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Over

Combined 44 runs in the last 5 matches (19 + 25) for both teams yields an average of 8.8 runs per game. Despite weak recent form, both offen...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 66% over

Combination of Oakland's recent run allowance (high runs allowed in their last 5), Civale's elevated season ERA, and Guaranteed Rate Field's...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over

Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities, and the over/under line is set at 2.5, which is low for MLB games. ([thescore.com](ht...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Both offenses have shown inconsistency but Athletics allow heavy scoring on the road. Five rest days for each club points to fresher arms ye...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% Over 8.5

The Athletics' recent games have been high-scoring affairs, with their pitching staff conceding an average of 7.6 runs per game. This tenden...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over

Both teams have conceded a significant number of runs in their last 5 games, suggesting potential defensive weaknesses. While their scoring...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 53% over 8.5

Both teams have been conceding runs frequently—Athletics gave up 38 in last 5 games, White Sox 23—and the total has gone over in many of tho...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
home_ -1.5 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Athletics +1

The Athletics' recent run-scoring edge (25 vs 19) and slightly better offensive efficiency offset their abysmal defense. A +1 spread typical...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% home_ -1.5

Given Sean Burke's steadier run prevention and the White Sox home advantage, Chicago is modestly favored to cover a -1.5 runline; Civale's i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago White Sox

The White Sox's home advantage and recent win suggest they can cover a -1 spread. ([baseball-reference.com](https://www.baseball-reference.c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% home_ -1.5

White Sox as home favorites project a narrow win that covers the run line more often than not given Athletics' road form. Both clubs rest eq...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 40% Chicago White Sox -1.5

While covering a 1.5-run spread can be challenging in baseball, the Athletics' significant struggles, particularly with their pitching allow...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Athletics

The Athletics have a slightly better scoring record and have conceded fewer runs on average in their recent matches, despite a worse win-los...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 62% Athletics +1.5

The Athletics have been competitive even in losses, often losing by one run. The White Sox have not been dominant even when winning. Spread...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Chicago White Sox 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Under 4.5

Early-inning scoring (first 5 frames) typically depends heavily on starting-pitcher quality and bullpen advantage in the opening innings. Wi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 46% Chicago White Sox

Early-game (first five innings) edge goes to Chicago because Burke has produced more quality early innings this season while Civale has show...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago White Sox

The White Sox's home advantage and recent performance suggest they may lead after the first five innings. ([baseball-reference.com](https://...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Chicago White Sox

Home starter edge and ballpark factors favor Chicago through five innings. Athletics offense has been inefficient early in games during poor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Chicago White Sox F5

Based on general team form and historical tendencies, the Chicago White Sox are more likely to hold a lead after the first five innings, ben...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% over

Considering the offensive struggles and the tendency for both teams to concede runs, the first five innings might still see a decent number...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Athletics

Starting pitchers are crucial in first five innings; without specific starter data, the Athletics slightly better form and potential underdo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Chicago White Sox 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Athletics

Both teams are in poor form, but the Athletics have scored 25 runs in their last 5 matches versus the White Sox's 19, suggesting slightly be...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Chicago White Sox

Chicago enters this start with Sean Burke (stable 3.60–3.80 ERA range in 2026) against Aaron Civale, who has surrendered more runs this seas...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago White Sox

The Chicago White Sox have a home advantage and a slightly better overall record. Their recent form includes a win against the Guardians on...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Chicago White Sox

White Sox hold slight home edge and better recent record despite both clubs struggling overall. Athletics' 1-4 mark and defensive issues mak...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Chicago White Sox

Based on general baseball knowledge and the provided recent form, the White Sox have shown slightly better defensive numbers in their last f...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Athletics

The Athletics have shown slightly better recent form, despite both teams struggling. Their away form, though poor, has seen them score more...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Athletics

The Athletics have been slightly more competitive recently despite a poor record, and with the White Sox also struggling, the away team has...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Chicago White Sox

62
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Athletics

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Chicago White Sox

58
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Chicago White Sox

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Athletics

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Athletics

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Chicago White Sox

54

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 131–87 · 60%
+69.2u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 966–735 · 57%
-538.9u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 140–110 · 56%
-14.7u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 617–528 · 54%
-308.7u
o4-mini
o4-mini 79–70 · 53%
+75.9u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 117–108 · 52%
+110.9u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 179–168 · 52%
-45.9u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1050–1028 · 51%
-842.7u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 170–170 · 50%
-59.8u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 699–711 · 50%
-469.5u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 118–121 · 49%
+93.0u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 944–970 · 49%
-661.4u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 806–862 · 48%
-660.8u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 445–477 · 48%
-322.0u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 951–1039 · 48%
-876.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 140–174 · 45%
-70.6u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 1641e75ade06fed5…
Kickoff
Fri, Jul 10 · 23:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 10898,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-10T23:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Fri, 10 Jul 2026 23:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Athletics",
        "home": "Chicago White Sox"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LLLWL",
            "record": "1W-0D-4L",
            "scored": 25,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 38
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WWLLL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 19,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 23
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 5,
            "home": 5
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →