Chicago Cubs vs Toronto Blue Jays
Kickoff · Sat, Jun 20 · 18:20 GMT+0000
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
b15601d88572edc1…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Jun 20 · 18:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 4407,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-06-20T18:20:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 20 Jun 2026 18:20:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Toronto Blue Jays",
"home": "Chicago Cubs"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-17T05:49:15+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models picked
Who picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
52%
Over 9.0 |
53%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 |
54%
Under 4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs As of my training knowledge cutoff (September 2024), the Cubs have been a stronger team in 2024 with better overall roster depth and pitchin...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 9.0 MLB June regular season games typically average 8.5–9.5 runs total. Both the Cubs and Blue Jays have had league-average offenses in recent h...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 The Cubs' home field advantage and historical 2024 roster strength support a modest run-line favorite position. A 1.5-run spread is typical...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Under 4.5 Early-inning scoring in MLB averages 3.5–4.5 runs total. First five innings typically see lower scoring as pitchers are fresher and bullpens... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
60%
over |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs The Chicago Cubs have a slight edge playing at home, with a 20-15 record at Wrigley Field. The Toronto Blue Jays have a 13-20 record on the...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown inconsistent offensive performances recently. The Cubs have scored 83 runs in their last 10 games, averaging 8.3 runs...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Chicago Cubs The Cubs' home advantage and slightly better recent form give them an edge to cover a -1 spread. Their 20-15 home record and the Blue Jays'...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Chicago Cubs The Cubs' home advantage and slightly better recent form give them an edge to lead after the first five innings. Their 20-15 home record and...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o3 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
54%
Chicago Cubs |
52%
over |
51%
Chicago Cubs |
53%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
Chicago Cubs Cubs hold slight home edge in this interleague matchup based on historical park factors at Wrigley. Blue Jays offense has been inconsistent...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over June weather in Chicago typically favors hitters with moderate winds. Both lineups project average or better run expectancy. Training data t...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Chicago Cubs Run-line value sits with Cubs given home status and modest pitching edge projected. Blue Jays road performance has historically lagged. Limi...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Chicago Cubs Early game edge leans home with Cubs starter typically keeping runs down in first five frames. Visiting offenses adjust slower on the road.... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Toronto Blue Jays |
55%
Over 8.5 |
55%
Chicago Cubs +1.5 |
51%
Toronto Blue Jays F5 Moneyline |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Toronto Blue Jays Based on my training data up to my last update, the Toronto Blue Jays generally possess a slightly more potent offensive lineup and a deeper...
1 source cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Both the Chicago Cubs and Toronto Blue Jays have historically featured lineups capable of high offensive output. Wrigley Field, a known hitt...
1 source cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Chicago Cubs +1.5 Although the Toronto Blue Jays are projected to win the game outright, the Chicago Cubs, playing at home, are expected to keep the game comp...
1 source cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Toronto Blue Jays F5 Moneyline The Toronto Blue Jays typically feature strong starting pitching and a potent offensive lineup capable of scoring early runs. This early gam...
1 source cited
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Toronto Blue Jays |
53%
over |
52%
Toronto Blue Jays |
54%
Toronto Blue Jays |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Toronto Blue Jays Based on training data, the Toronto Blue Jays generally held a competitive edge against the Chicago Cubs. Without current live data, this hi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over MLB games, in general, tend to have a slight tendency towards exceeding average total run lines. This prediction is based on general basebal...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Toronto Blue Jays Given the historical edge of the Blue Jays, they are slightly favored to cover a neutral spread. This prediction assumes a standard spread v...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Toronto Blue Jays The Blue Jays' general historical performance suggests they might have a slight advantage in the early stages of the game. This prediction i... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Toronto Blue Jays |
55%
Over 8.5 |
40%
Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 |
55%
Toronto Blue Jays |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Toronto Blue Jays Based on training data through June 2025, the Blue Jays have a slight edge over the Cubs in recent seasons. The Cubs are in a rebuilding pha...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Both teams have average to above-average offenses, and the pitching matchups are not dominant aces. Wrigley Field is hitter-friendly. Expect...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 The Blue Jays are favored to win, but winning by 2 or more is less likely. The Cubs can keep it close at home. Low confidence due to lack of...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Toronto Blue Jays If the Blue Jays have the advantage in starting pitching, they are likely to lead after 5 innings. The Cubs' bullpen is weaker, but the star... |
|||||
|
Consensus |
Chicago Cubs 3/6 |
over 3/6 |
Chicago Cubs 2/6 |
Chicago Cubs 2/6 |
|
Pro on-demand
Request an AI audit
Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.
Ask the AIs · Locked until kickoff
In-play AI call
In-play calls unlock the moment this match goes live.
Sign in to ask the AIs about this match. Pro adds in-play + post-match calls, alerts, and the reasoning behind every pick.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.