Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 6–8
Chicago Cubs logo

Chicago CubsvsToronto Blue Jays

Toronto Blue Jays logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final6–8 Locked 28picks · 13 graded AIs split
Recap Consensus missed

Chicago Cubs 6–8 Toronto Blue Jays

4 of 7 AIs leaned Chicago Cubs — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
Chicago Cubs 4/7
Correct calls
3/7
Final
6–8

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 53% Chicago Cubs -1.5 L

The Cubs' home field advantage and historical 2024 roster strength support a modest run-line favorite position. A 1.5-run spread is typical...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 45% home_ -1.5

A Cubs win by two or more is plausible given the matchup and home/park advantages, but both starters and the Cubs' thin pitching depth add v...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs L

The Cubs' home advantage and slightly better recent form give them an edge to cover a -1 spread. Their 20-15 home record and the Blue Jays'...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Chicago Cubs

Run-line value sits with Cubs given home status and modest pitching edge projected. Blue Jays road performance has historically lagged. Limi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Chicago Cubs +1.5 L

Although the Toronto Blue Jays are projected to win the game outright, the Chicago Cubs, playing at home, are expected to keep the game comp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Toronto Blue Jays

Given the historical edge of the Blue Jays, they are slightly favored to cover a neutral spread. This prediction assumes a standard spread v...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 40% Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 W

The Blue Jays are favored to win, but winning by 2 or more is less likely. The Cubs can keep it close at home. Low confidence due to lack of...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Chicago Cubs L

As of my training knowledge cutoff (September 2024), the Cubs have been a stronger team in 2024 with better overall roster depth and pitchin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% Chicago Cubs L

MLB and other outlets list Patrick Corbin vs Colin Rea as the probable starters; while both have middling ERAs, the Cubs get the home park a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs L

The Chicago Cubs have a slight edge playing at home, with a 20-15 record at Wrigley Field. The Toronto Blue Jays have a 13-20 record on the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Chicago Cubs L

Cubs hold slight home edge in this interleague matchup based on historical park factors at Wrigley. Blue Jays offense has been inconsistent...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Toronto Blue Jays W

Based on my training data up to my last update, the Toronto Blue Jays generally possess a slightly more potent offensive lineup and a deeper...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Toronto Blue Jays W

Based on training data, the Toronto Blue Jays generally held a competitive edge against the Chicago Cubs. Without current live data, this hi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Toronto Blue Jays W

Based on training data through June 2025, the Blue Jays have a slight edge over the Cubs in recent seasons. The Cubs are in a rebuilding pha...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 2/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Under 4.5

Early-inning scoring in MLB averages 3.5–4.5 runs total. First five innings typically see lower scoring as pitchers are fresher and bullpens...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs' home advantage and slightly better recent form give them an edge to lead after the first five innings. Their 20-15 home record and...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Chicago Cubs

Early game edge leans home with Cubs starter typically keeping runs down in first five frames. Visiting offenses adjust slower on the road....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Toronto Blue Jays F5 Moneyline

The Toronto Blue Jays typically feature strong starting pitching and a potent offensive lineup capable of scoring early runs. This early gam...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Toronto Blue Jays

The Blue Jays' general historical performance suggests they might have a slight advantage in the early stages of the game. This prediction i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Toronto Blue Jays

If the Blue Jays have the advantage in starting pitching, they are likely to lead after 5 innings. The Cubs' bullpen is weaker, but the star...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Over 9.0

MLB June regular season games typically average 8.5–9.5 runs total. Both the Cubs and Blue Jays have had league-average offenses in recent h...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% over W

Both probable starters carry ERAs in the mid-to-high 4s (Corbin ~4.57, Rea ~5.35) and Wrigley is forecasted with light wind and comfortable...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over W

Both teams have shown inconsistent offensive performances recently. The Cubs have scored 83 runs in their last 10 games, averaging 8.3 runs...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

June weather in Chicago typically favors hitters with moderate winds. Both lineups project average or better run expectancy. Training data t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Over 8.5

Both the Chicago Cubs and Toronto Blue Jays have historically featured lineups capable of high offensive output. Wrigley Field, a known hitt...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% over

MLB games, in general, tend to have a slight tendency towards exceeding average total run lines. This prediction is based on general basebal...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Over 8.5

Both teams have average to above-average offenses, and the pitching matchups are not dominant aces. Wrigley Field is hitter-friendly. Expect...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First five innings 5.0

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

Given the starters listed (Corbin L, Rea R) and the Cubs' home-side offensive activity in the series, Chicago is slightly more likely to lea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Chicago Cubs

58
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Chicago Cubs

55
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Chicago Cubs

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Toronto Blue Jays

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Toronto Blue Jays

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Chicago Cubs

54
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Toronto Blue Jays

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: c2b8eeed65dccf73…
Kickoff
Sat, Jun 20 · 18:20 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 4407,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-20T18:20:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sat, 20 Jun 2026 18:20:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Toronto Blue Jays",
        "home": "Chicago Cubs"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-17T05:49:12+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →