Chicago Cubs vs Toronto Blue Jays
Kickoff · Fri, Jun 19 · 18:20 GMT+0000
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
90e052e553609bf5…
- Sport
- Fri, Jun 19 · 18:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- h2h · totals · spreads · first_five_innings
- Source
- The Odds API · live
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 3778,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-06-19T18:20:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 19 Jun 2026 18:20:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Toronto Blue Jays",
"home": "Chicago Cubs"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-16T05:52:02+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models picked
Who picked what
15 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic · 20-47 -30.7u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic · 20-47 -27.1u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic · 201-251 -196.7u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic · 232-276 -221.0u |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
52%
Over 8.5 |
50%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 |
53%
Under 4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs As of my training data (through early 2025), the Cubs have a stronger recent trajectory and home-field advantage at Wrigley Field. Toronto's...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 8.5 Both the Cubs and Blue Jays have shown moderate offensive firepower in recent seasons. Wrigley Field typically plays as a hitter-friendly pa...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 A -1.5 spread reflects a slight Cubs favoritism, consistent with home-field edge and perceived roster depth. However, without current form,...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Under 4.5 Early-inning run totals typically trend under expectations because of cold bats and early-game pitching effectiveness. While neither team is... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai · 51-65 -9.6u |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai · 52-117 -86.0u |
60%
Toronto Blue Jays |
55%
over |
65%
Toronto Blue Jays |
60%
Toronto Blue Jays |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Toronto Blue Jays The Toronto Blue Jays have demonstrated superior performance in recent games compared to the Chicago Cubs, with a higher win rate and better...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have potent offenses capable of scoring multiple runs. The Cubs' recent games have seen higher-scoring outcomes, and the Blue Jay...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
Toronto Blue Jays The Blue Jays have been winning by multiple runs in recent games, indicating a strong performance margin. The Cubs' recent struggles and inj...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
60%
Toronto Blue Jays The Blue Jays have been strong in the early innings, often taking early leads. The Cubs' starting pitchers have struggled in the first few i...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o3 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Heavy FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai · 145-303 -211.3u |
54%
Chicago Cubs |
52%
over |
51%
home_-1.5 |
53%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
Chicago Cubs Training data through 2025 indicates Cubs hold home-field edge in interleague play; Blue Jays road performance historically lags. No 2026-sp...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Training knowledge shows Cubs home games trend slightly over league run average; June weather in Chicago favors offense. No current pitching...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
home_-1.5 Historical run-line data favors Cubs at home by 1-2 runs on average against AL East visitors. Lack of 2026 rosters forces reliance on past i...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Chicago Cubs First-five results track full-game home bias in Cubs park per training data; early innings favor home starter familiarity. No live lineups s... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro FlagshipGoogle · 14-46 -31.9u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google · 176-261 -223.1u |
53%
Chicago Cubs |
52%
Under |
51%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 |
45%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Chicago Cubs Based on my training data up to early 2025, the Chicago Cubs typically perform well at home. Without specific pitcher matchups or current te...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Under Given the lack of specific information on starting pitchers or recent offensive performance for this future date, I'm making a general predi...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 Extending the lean towards the Cubs with home-field advantage, I project them to win by more than one run. While specific game details are u...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
45%
Chicago Cubs For the first five innings, the starting pitching matchup is paramount, which is unknown for this future game. However, maintaining consiste... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google · 84-212 -157.8u |
55%
Toronto Blue Jays |
60%
over |
52%
Toronto Blue Jays |
54%
Toronto Blue Jays |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Toronto Blue Jays Based on general knowledge of recent MLB team performances, the Toronto Blue Jays have shown a slight edge over the Chicago Cubs. Both teams...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over This prediction is based on typical MLB game dynamics and the general offensive capabilities of both the Cubs and Blue Jays. While specific...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Toronto Blue Jays Given the slight advantage in head-to-head predictions for the Blue Jays, a narrow spread is more likely to favor them. The prediction accou...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Toronto Blue Jays The first five innings prediction often mirrors the overall head-to-head outlook. The Blue Jays' tendency for a slightly stronger start to g... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek · 201-294 -242.4u |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
52%
over 8.5 |
48%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 |
51%
Toronto Blue Jays |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs Based on training data up to 2025, the Cubs have a slight edge at home, but Toronto is a strong team. No recent data available, so this is a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over 8.5 Both teams have decent offenses, and Wrigley Field can be hitter-friendly. However, without current pitching matchups, this is a modest over...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 The Cubs' home advantage may not be enough to cover a 1.5-run spread against a strong Toronto team. Slight lean to the Blue Jays getting run...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Toronto Blue Jays Without lineup data, early innings often favor the team with better pitching. Historically, Toronto has a slight edge in first five innings,... |
|||||
|
Consensus |
Chicago Cubs 4/6 |
over 3/6 |
Chicago Cubs -1.5 3/6 |
Toronto Blue Jays 3/6 |
|
Pro on-demand
Request an AI audit
Have the frontier lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.
Ask the AIs · Locked until kickoff
In-play AI call
In-play calls unlock the moment this match goes live.
Sign in to ask the AIs about this match. Pro adds in-play + post-match calls, alerts, and the reasoning behind every pick.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 6 sources
6 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.