Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 16–2
Chicago Cubs logo

Chicago CubsvsToronto Blue Jays

Toronto Blue Jays logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final16–2 Locked 28picks · 16 graded
Recap Consensus called it

Chicago Cubs 16–2 Toronto Blue Jays

5 of 7 AIs leaned Chicago Cubs — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Chicago Cubs 5/7
Correct calls
5/7
Final
16–2

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Chicago Cubs W

As of my training data (through early 2025), the Cubs have a stronger recent trajectory and home-field advantage at Wrigley Field. Toronto's...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 64% Chicago Cubs W

After research the market-grade factors favor Chicago: ESPN's game preview shows Cubs at Wrigley with a 63.5% model edge, plus solid home of...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Toronto Blue Jays L

The Toronto Blue Jays have demonstrated superior performance in recent games compared to the Chicago Cubs, with a higher win rate and better...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Chicago Cubs W

Training data through 2025 indicates Cubs hold home-field edge in interleague play; Blue Jays road performance historically lags. No 2026-sp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Chicago Cubs W

Based on my training data up to early 2025, the Chicago Cubs typically perform well at home. Without specific pitcher matchups or current te...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Toronto Blue Jays L

Based on general knowledge of recent MLB team performances, the Toronto Blue Jays have shown a slight edge over the Chicago Cubs. Both teams...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Chicago Cubs W

Based on training data up to 2025, the Cubs have a slight edge at home, but Toronto is a strong team. No recent data available, so this is a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Over 8.5 W

Both the Cubs and Blue Jays have shown moderate offensive firepower in recent seasons. Wrigley Field typically plays as a hitter-friendly pa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% under L

Combined season scoring for the clubs (~4.02 R/G TOR + 4.26 R/G CHC ≈ 8.28) sits just below an 8.5 line; with two quality arms (Gausman and...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over W

Both teams have potent offenses capable of scoring multiple runs. The Cubs' recent games have seen higher-scoring outcomes, and the Blue Jay...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Training knowledge shows Cubs home games trend slightly over league run average; June weather in Chicago favors offense. No current pitching...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Under L

Given the lack of specific information on starting pitchers or recent offensive performance for this future date, I'm making a general predi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over

This prediction is based on typical MLB game dynamics and the general offensive capabilities of both the Cubs and Blue Jays. While specific...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% over 8.5

Both teams have decent offenses, and Wrigley Field can be hitter-friendly. However, without current pitching matchups, this is a modest over...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Chicago Cubs -1.5 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 50% Chicago Cubs -1.5 W

A -1.5 spread reflects a slight Cubs favoritism, consistent with home-field edge and perceived roster depth. However, without current form,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 45% Chicago Cubs -1.5 W

Cubs are the favorite overall but beating a -1.5 runline (winning by 2+ runs) is less likely than a straight win; Cubs' home offense and dep...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Toronto Blue Jays L

The Blue Jays have been winning by multiple runs in recent games, indicating a strong performance margin. The Cubs' recent struggles and inj...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% home_ -1.5

Historical run-line data favors Cubs at home by 1-2 runs on average against AL East visitors. Lack of 2026 rosters forces reliance on past i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Chicago Cubs -1.5 W

Extending the lean towards the Cubs with home-field advantage, I project them to win by more than one run. While specific game details are u...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Toronto Blue Jays

Given the slight advantage in head-to-head predictions for the Blue Jays, a narrow spread is more likely to favor them. The prediction accou...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 48% Chicago Cubs -1.5 W

The Cubs' home advantage may not be enough to cover a 1.5-run spread against a strong Toronto team. Slight lean to the Blue Jays getting run...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Toronto Blue Jays 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 53% Under 4.5

Early-inning run totals typically trend under expectations because of cold bats and early-game pitching effectiveness. While neither team is...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 52% Toronto Blue Jays

For first five innings the Blue Jays have a small edge because Kevin Gausman (TOR) is likely to give a quality first-to-fifth stretch and li...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Toronto Blue Jays

The Blue Jays have been strong in the early innings, often taking early leads. The Cubs' starting pitchers have struggled in the first few i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Chicago Cubs

First-five results track full-game home bias in Cubs park per training data; early innings favor home starter familiarity. No live lineups s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 45% Chicago Cubs

For the first five innings, the starting pitching matchup is paramount, which is unknown for this future game. However, maintaining consiste...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Toronto Blue Jays

The first five innings prediction often mirrors the overall head-to-head outlook. The Blue Jays' tendency for a slightly stronger start to g...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 51% Toronto Blue Jays

Without lineup data, early innings often favor the team with better pitching. Historically, Toronto has a slight edge in first five innings,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Chicago Cubs

64
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Toronto Blue Jays

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Chicago Cubs

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Toronto Blue Jays

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Chicago Cubs

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Chicago Cubs

54
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Chicago Cubs

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: f431547394bbc4d8…
Kickoff
Fri, Jun 19 · 18:20 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 3778,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-19T18:20:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Fri, 19 Jun 2026 18:20:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Toronto Blue Jays",
        "home": "Chicago Cubs"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-16T05:52:05+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →