Chicago CubsvsSt.Louis Cardinals
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Chicago Cubs 6/6 models |
Chicago Cubs -1.5 3/6 models |
over 3/6 models |
Chicago Cubs 4/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Chicago Cubs |
59%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 |
58%
Under 8.5 |
55%
Under 4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Chicago Cubs Chicago Cubs are in strong form (4W-1L over last 5) with +6 run differential, while St. Louis Cardinals are struggling (2W-3L) with -10 run...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
59%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 Cubs' dominant recent form (4W-1L, +26 runs scored, +6 differential) versus Cardinals' decline (2W-3L, +12 runs scored, -10 differential) su...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 8.5 Cardinals' defensive struggles (22 runs conceded in 5 games) and weak offensive output (12 runs in 5 games) suggest low-scoring tension. Cub...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Under 4.5 Early-inning run production typically relies on starter quality and early-game momentum. Cardinals' recent offensive collapse (2.4 runs/game... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
60%
over |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs The Chicago Cubs have a strong home advantage, with a recent record of 4 wins and 1 loss in their last 5 games. The St. Louis Cardinals have...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Chicago Cubs Given the Cubs' strong home performance and the Cardinals' recent struggles, the Cubs are likely to cover a -1 spread. The Cubs' recent form...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown offensive capabilities in recent games, with the Cubs scoring 26 runs in their last 5 matches and the Cardinals scorin...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Chicago Cubs The Cubs' strong home performance and the Cardinals' recent struggles suggest the Cubs will lead after the first five innings. The Cubs' rec...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Chicago Cubs |
52%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 |
51%
over |
51%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Chicago Cubs Home side shows stronger recent form (4W-1L) than visitors (2W-3L) per provided context. Both clubs have identical 4 rest days. Prediction d...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 Home team enters with superior win streak and run differential in recent matches. Venue advantage for Cubs against Cardinals. Prediction dra...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Home offense posted 26 runs over last 5 games versus 12 for visitors. Equal rest days reduce fatigue effects. Prediction drawn solely from t...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Chicago Cubs Home club's offensive output and form edge should translate into early lead probability. Starting pitching matchup unknown but rest parity l... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Chicago Cubs |
55%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 |
58%
Over |
60%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Chicago Cubs The Chicago Cubs enter this game in significantly better simulated recent form, winning four of their last five, while the Cardinals have st...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 Given the Cubs' superior simulated recent form and home-field advantage, they are capable of winning by more than a single run. Their strong...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over The Chicago Cubs have been productive offensively, averaging over 5 runs in their last five simulated games, while the Cardinals' pitching h...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
60%
Chicago Cubs The Cubs' offensive strength and the Cardinals' simulated recent pitching struggles should manifest early in the game, giving the home team... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
Chicago Cubs |
52%
St.Louis Cardinals |
55%
over |
57%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Chicago Cubs The Chicago Cubs are in better recent form (4-1) compared to the St. Louis Cardinals (2-3). The Cubs also have a slight edge in starting pit...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
St.Louis Cardinals While the Cubs are favored to win, their recent wins have often been close. The Cardinals, despite their struggles, have the potential to ke...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown offensive capability recently, with the Cubs scoring 26 runs in their last 5 games. While the pitching matchup isn't e...
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
57%
Chicago Cubs The Cubs have been strong offensively, especially early in games, and Justin Steele has a tendency to start strong. The Cardinals' Miles Mik...
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
40%
Cubs -1.5 |
53%
Over 8.5 |
52%
Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs The Cubs have strong recent form (4W-1L) and home-field advantage at Wrigley Field. The Cardinals are on a 3-game losing streak and have str...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
Cubs -1.5 The Cubs are favored but covering a 1.5-run spread requires a comfortable win. The Cardinals have struggled but are capable of keeping it cl...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Over 8.5 Both bullpens have been heavily used recently, which could lead to more runs late. Wrigley Field in July can be hitter-friendly with wind of...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Cubs Starting pitchers are key for the first five innings. Without specific starter data, we rely on overall team form and home advantage. The Cu... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusChicago Cubs 6/6
Chicago Cubs are in strong form (4W-1L over last 5) with +6 run differential, while St. Louis Cardinals are struggling (2W-3L) with -10 run...
The Chicago Cubs have a strong home advantage, with a recent record of 4 wins and 1 loss in their last 5 games. The St. Louis Cardinals have...
Home side shows stronger recent form (4W-1L) than visitors (2W-3L) per provided context. Both clubs have identical 4 rest days. Prediction d...
The Chicago Cubs enter this game in significantly better simulated recent form, winning four of their last five, while the Cardinals have st...
The Chicago Cubs are in better recent form (4-1) compared to the St. Louis Cardinals (2-3). The Cubs also have a slight edge in starting pit...
The Cubs have strong recent form (4W-1L) and home-field advantage at Wrigley Field. The Cardinals are on a 3-game losing streak and have str...
Spread
ConsensusChicago Cubs -1.5 3/6
Cubs' dominant recent form (4W-1L, +26 runs scored, +6 differential) versus Cardinals' decline (2W-3L, +12 runs scored, -10 differential) su...
Given the Cubs' strong home performance and the Cardinals' recent struggles, the Cubs are likely to cover a -1 spread. The Cubs' recent form...
Home team enters with superior win streak and run differential in recent matches. Venue advantage for Cubs against Cardinals. Prediction dra...
Given the Cubs' superior simulated recent form and home-field advantage, they are capable of winning by more than a single run. Their strong...
While the Cubs are favored to win, their recent wins have often been close. The Cardinals, despite their struggles, have the potential to ke...
The Cubs are favored but covering a 1.5-run spread requires a comfortable win. The Cardinals have struggled but are capable of keeping it cl...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
Cardinals' defensive struggles (22 runs conceded in 5 games) and weak offensive output (12 runs in 5 games) suggest low-scoring tension. Cub...
Both teams have shown offensive capabilities in recent games, with the Cubs scoring 26 runs in their last 5 matches and the Cardinals scorin...
Home offense posted 26 runs over last 5 games versus 12 for visitors. Equal rest days reduce fatigue effects. Prediction drawn solely from t...
The Chicago Cubs have been productive offensively, averaging over 5 runs in their last five simulated games, while the Cardinals' pitching h...
Both teams have shown offensive capability recently, with the Cubs scoring 26 runs in their last 5 games. While the pitching matchup isn't e...
Both bullpens have been heavily used recently, which could lead to more runs late. Wrigley Field in July can be hitter-friendly with wind of...
First 5 innings
ConsensusChicago Cubs 4/6
Early-inning run production typically relies on starter quality and early-game momentum. Cardinals' recent offensive collapse (2.4 runs/game...
The Cubs' strong home performance and the Cardinals' recent struggles suggest the Cubs will lead after the first five innings. The Cubs' rec...
Home club's offensive output and form edge should translate into early lead probability. Starting pitching matchup unknown but rest parity l...
The Cubs' offensive strength and the Cardinals' simulated recent pitching struggles should manifest early in the game, giving the home team...
The Cubs have been strong offensively, especially early in games, and Justin Steele has a tendency to start strong. The Cardinals' Miles Mik...
Starting pitchers are key for the first five innings. Without specific starter data, we rely on overall team form and home advantage. The Cu...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Chicago Cubs
Claude Haiku 4.5
Chicago Cubs
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Chicago Cubs
GPT-4o Mini
Chicago Cubs
DeepSeek V3
Chicago Cubs
Grok 4 Fast
Chicago Cubs
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
0e455688b8fc0454…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Jul 5 · 00:08 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 9818,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-07-05T00:08:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 05 Jul 2026 00:08:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "St.Louis Cardinals",
"home": "Chicago Cubs"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWLLL",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 12,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 22
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WWWWL",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 26,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 20
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 4,
"home": 4
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
4 tool calls · 6 sources
6 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.