Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 23–3
Chicago Cubs logo

Chicago CubsvsSan Diego Padres

San Diego Padres logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final23–3 Locked 28picks · 15 graded
Recap Consensus called it

Chicago Cubs 23–3 San Diego Padres

5 of 7 AIs leaned Chicago Cubs — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Chicago Cubs 5/7
Correct calls
5/7
Final
23–3

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Chicago Cubs W

Chicago Cubs show stronger recent form with a 4-1 record over the last 5 matches versus San Diego's 3-2, and Cubs have posted a +9 run diffe...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 56% San Diego Padres L

Padres get a clear starting-pitching edge with Walker Buehler on the bump while the Cubs will have Colin Rea, who has a higher ERA and lower...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% San Diego Padres L

The Padres have a strong away record (20-18) and have shown resilience in recent games, despite a recent loss to the Dodgers. The Cubs have...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% Chicago Cubs W

Cubs enter with superior recent form (4W-1L, +9 run differential) versus Padres (3W-2L, -4). Home rest advantage and Wrigley factors favor C...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 56% Chicago Cubs W

Based on general baseball knowledge from training data (up to my last update), the Cubs generally benefit from home-field advantage at Wrigl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Chicago Cubs W

The Chicago Cubs are in better recent form, especially at home, and have a slight advantage in the projected starting pitching matchup. Thei...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Chicago Cubs W

Based on training data through 2025 season, the Cubs have strong home form and a slight rest advantage. However, the Padres have a solid lin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Chicago Cubs -1.5 W

Cubs' recent run differential and rest advantage support a small home favoring, but the lack of starting-pitcher identity and precise Wrigle...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 35% San Diego Padres -1.5 L

While I favor the Padres moneyline because of Buehler, a two-run-plus margin is less likely — MLB games are frequently single-run affairs an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% San Diego Padres L

Given the Padres' strong away record and recent form, they are likely to cover the -1 spread against the Cubs, who have a solid home record...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Chicago Cubs

Home team with extra rest and better recent results projects to a narrow win; spread value leans Cubs. Limited head-to-head context availabl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 49% Chicago Cubs -1.5 W

Given the Cubs' slightly better recent form and home-field advantage, a win by more than one run is plausible but not highly certain. Baseba...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Chicago Cubs

Given the Cubs' better recent form and home advantage, they are slightly favored to cover a modest spread. Their strong recent performance s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 68% San Diego Padres +1.5 L

Padres are competitive and games are often close. Even if Cubs win, Padres are likely to stay within one run, making the run line value for...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Chicago Cubs

Early-inning performance in baseball often mirrors team form and starter quality. Cubs' strong 4-1 record and +9 run differential suggest th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% San Diego Padres

First-five innings favor the team with the better starter — Walker Buehler projects to provide high-leverage quality innings early while Col...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% San Diego Padres

The Padres' starting pitcher, Walker Buehler, has a solid ERA of 3.81, suggesting a strong start. Combined with the Padres' away performance...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Chicago Cubs

Early-game edges usually track season-long starter quality and Cubs hold the home start. Form differential is modest so first-five leans onl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Chicago Cubs

The first five innings heavily rely on the starting pitchers, which are unknown. However, factoring in the Cubs' home-field advantage and sl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs' projected starter has shown better early-game performance and the team's offense has been more potent recently, suggesting they ma...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 53% Chicago Cubs

The first five innings often favor the starting pitcher and home team advantage. Cubs have slight edge with rest and home field, but without...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Over 8.5

Combined scoring across both teams in the reference period is 52 runs over 5 matches, averaging 10.4 runs per game. Cubs' offensive form (28...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% over W

The combination of a hittable Cubs lineup against a high-quality Buehler start and an exploitable Colin Rea facing a powerful Padres order p...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over W

Both teams have shown offensive capabilities, with the Cubs averaging 4.9 runs per game and the Padres 3.9. The warm weather conditions in C...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Both clubs posted high run totals in recent games and the Cubs bullpen has been used heavily. Wrigley in July typically plays neutral to hit...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Over 8.5 W

Analyzing the recent scoring from the brief, both teams have been involved in relatively high-scoring games. The Cubs scored 28 runs in 5 ga...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% over

The weather forecast indicates wind blowing out, which generally increases scoring potential. Both teams have shown offensive capability in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Over 8.5

Wrigley Field in summer can favor hitting, and both teams have been scoring consistently. The recent over trend and average run totals sugge...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Chicago Cubs

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

San Diego Padres

56
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Chicago Cubs

56
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

San Diego Padres

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Chicago Cubs

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Chicago Cubs

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Chicago Cubs

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1062–1080 · 50%
-771.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 3e91db4f1299a59d…
Kickoff
Wed, Jul 1 · 18:20 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 9254,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-01T18:20:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Wed, 01 Jul 2026 18:20:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "San Diego Padres",
        "home": "Chicago Cubs"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LLWWW",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 24,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 28
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WWLWW",
            "record": "4W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 28,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 19
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 3
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →