Chicago CubsvsPittsburgh Pirates
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Chicago Cubs 4/5 models |
over 2/5 models |
Chicago Cubs 1/5 models |
Chicago Cubs 2/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Chicago Cubs |
54%
Under 7.5 |
52%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 |
56%
Under 4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Chicago Cubs Home-field advantage at Wrigley Field combined with the Cubs' 3-2 recent record gives a modest edge. Both teams are evenly matched in form (...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Under 7.5 Cubs' recent offensive output (21 runs in 5 matches, 4.2 RPG) is below league average, and Pirates have allowed only 22 runs over the same s...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 The Cubs' home-field advantage and balanced recent form support a modest spread pick, but the Pirates' strong offensive output (35 runs in 5...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
56%
Under 4.5 First-five-inning scoring is typically suppressed relative to full-game totals, especially in September when starters tend to be fresher and... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
52%
over |
53%
Chicago Cubs |
54%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs Cubs hold slight home edge at Wrigley Field despite similar recent records. Pirates recent scoring edge is offset by road play and training...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Wrigley Field wind patterns and late-September temperatures typically boost run totals. Both offenses showed scoring ability in recent form...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Chicago Cubs Home run-line value exists due to Cubs September home performance in historical data. Pirates road struggles against NL Central teams suppor...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Chicago Cubs Starting pitcher edge and home platoon splits give Cubs the first-five advantage per training patterns. Pirates early-inning offense has bee... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Chicago Cubs |
55%
Over 8.5 |
53%
Pittsburgh Pirates +1.5 |
51%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Chicago Cubs With both teams showing similar recent form (3W-2L), the Chicago Cubs gain a slight edge due to home-field advantage at Wrigley Field. While...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 The Pittsburgh Pirates have shown strong offensive form, scoring 35 runs in their last five games, while the Chicago Cubs have conceded 33 r...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Pittsburgh Pirates +1.5 Although the Cubs are favored to win outright, the Pirates' recent strong offensive output suggests they can keep the game close, even if th...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Chicago Cubs The first five innings heavily depend on the starting pitching matchup, which is unavailable for 2026. However, given the overall slight lea... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
52%
over |
52%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
51%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs The Chicago Cubs, playing at home in Wrigley Field, have a slight edge. While both teams have struggled recently, the Cubs' home advantage a...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Wrigley Field generally plays as a hitter-friendly park, and with both teams having porous defenses indicated by their recent conceded runs,...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Pittsburgh Pirates Given the slight home advantage for the Cubs in the head-to-head market, we predict the Pirates to cover a small spread. The Pirates' recent...
3 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
over The early innings of a baseball game are often influenced by the starting pitchers and early offense. Given Wrigley Field's hitter-friendly...
3 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
65%
over 2.5 |
50%
Pittsburgh Pirates -1 |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates Training data through 2025-09 indicates that at Wrigley Field the Cubs have struggled against right-handed starters, while the Pirates have...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
over 2.5 Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently, combining for 56 runs in their last five matches. Wrigley Field typically play...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Pittsburgh Pirates -1 Given the expectations of a close game, the run line is uncertain. The Pirates have been more consistent offensively and defensively in the...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates The Pirates have shown better early run production and starting pitching in recent weeks. The Cubs have been slow starters, scoring fewer ru... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusChicago Cubs 4/5
Home-field advantage at Wrigley Field combined with the Cubs' 3-2 recent record gives a modest edge. Both teams are evenly matched in form (...
Cubs hold slight home edge at Wrigley Field despite similar recent records. Pirates recent scoring edge is offset by road play and training...
With both teams showing similar recent form (3W-2L), the Chicago Cubs gain a slight edge due to home-field advantage at Wrigley Field. While...
The Chicago Cubs, playing at home in Wrigley Field, have a slight edge. While both teams have struggled recently, the Cubs' home advantage a...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates that at Wrigley Field the Cubs have struggled against right-handed starters, while the Pirates have...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/5
Cubs' recent offensive output (21 runs in 5 matches, 4.2 RPG) is below league average, and Pirates have allowed only 22 runs over the same s...
Wrigley Field wind patterns and late-September temperatures typically boost run totals. Both offenses showed scoring ability in recent form...
The Pittsburgh Pirates have shown strong offensive form, scoring 35 runs in their last five games, while the Chicago Cubs have conceded 33 r...
Wrigley Field generally plays as a hitter-friendly park, and with both teams having porous defenses indicated by their recent conceded runs,...
Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently, combining for 56 runs in their last five matches. Wrigley Field typically play...
Spread
ConsensusChicago Cubs 1/5
The Cubs' home-field advantage and balanced recent form support a modest spread pick, but the Pirates' strong offensive output (35 runs in 5...
Home run-line value exists due to Cubs September home performance in historical data. Pirates road struggles against NL Central teams suppor...
Although the Cubs are favored to win outright, the Pirates' recent strong offensive output suggests they can keep the game close, even if th...
Given the slight home advantage for the Cubs in the head-to-head market, we predict the Pirates to cover a small spread. The Pirates' recent...
Given the expectations of a close game, the run line is uncertain. The Pirates have been more consistent offensively and defensively in the...
First 5 innings
ConsensusChicago Cubs 2/5
First-five-inning scoring is typically suppressed relative to full-game totals, especially in September when starters tend to be fresher and...
Starting pitcher edge and home platoon splits give Cubs the first-five advantage per training patterns. Pirates early-inning offense has bee...
The first five innings heavily depend on the starting pitching matchup, which is unavailable for 2026. However, given the overall slight lea...
The early innings of a baseball game are often influenced by the starting pitchers and early offense. Given Wrigley Field's hitter-friendly...
The Pirates have shown better early run production and starting pitching in recent weeks. The Cubs have been slow starters, scoring fewer ru...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Chicago Cubs
Grok 4 Fast
Chicago Cubs
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Chicago Cubs
DeepSeek V3
Pittsburgh Pirates
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Chicago Cubs
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
abf27b787c39d5be…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Sep 11 · 18:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39442,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Wrigley Field",
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-09-11T18:20:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 11 Sep 2026 18:20:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Pittsburgh Pirates",
"home": "Chicago Cubs"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LWWWL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 35,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 22
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WWWLL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 21,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 33
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 64,
"home": 64
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.