Chicago CubsvsMinnesota Twins
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Minnesota Twins 5/6 models |
over 2/6 models |
Minnesota Twins -1.5 2/6 models |
Minnesota Twins 4/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Over 8.5 |
52%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
56%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Minnesota Twins Minnesota arrives with superior recent form (4-1 over last 5 vs Cubs' 3-2) and a +12 run differential in that stretch compared to Chicago's...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Both teams combined for 49 runs in their last 5 matches (9.8 runs per game average). Minnesota scored 28 runs across 5 games while allowing...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Minnesota's +12 run differential and 4-1 form record suggest they should win by more than one run on average. While Wrigley provides a sligh...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
56%
Minnesota Twins Early-game outcomes often reflect starting-pitcher quality and bullpen freshness. Minnesota's dominant last 5 (4-1, +12 differential) indica... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
60%
under |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins have shown strong recent form, winning 4 of their last 5 games, while the Chicago Cubs have lost 4 of their last 5. Addi...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
under Both teams have relatively low team batting averages (.247 for the Twins and .244 for the Cubs), suggesting limited offensive output. Additi...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Minnesota Twins The Twins' recent strong form and superior starting pitcher give them an edge, making them likely to cover the -1.5 spread. ([baseball-refer...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Minnesota Twins The Twins' strong starting pitcher, Joe Ryan, is likely to keep the Cubs' offense in check during the first five innings, giving the Twins a...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
52%
over |
53%
Chicago Cubs |
51%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs Cubs have slightly better recent form indicators in the provided context and benefit from home field at Wrigley. Twins last five show strong...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Wrigley can play neutral to hitter-friendly depending on wind; both lineups have shown scoring in recent samples. Extended rest for both clu...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Chicago Cubs Home team typically holds a run advantage at Wrigley; Cubs recent scoring and venue edge support covering a modest spread. No pitcher data a...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Chicago Cubs Early innings favor the home starter in most neutral park environments; Cubs hold slight overall edge. Limited platoon or bullpen detail for... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Over 8.5 |
52%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
56%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Minnesota Twins Based on the provided team form, the Minnesota Twins show significantly better recent performance, winning four of their last five games wit...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 The Chicago Cubs have been conceding a high number of runs recently (33 in 5 games), indicating potential pitching struggles. The Minnesota...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Given the Twins' superior recent form, indicated by their strong record and positive run differential, they are well-positioned to not only...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
56%
Minnesota Twins The first five innings are heavily influenced by the starting pitchers and early offensive performance. Given the Twins' overall strong rece... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
60%
over |
52%
Minnesota Twins |
58%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins and Chicago Cubs have very similar win-loss records, but the Twins' recent form of 4 wins in their last 5 games slightly...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Wrigley Field is a hitter-friendly park, and the weather forecast indicates moderate temperatures with west winds. While specific pitching m...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Minnesota Twins Given the slight edge in recent form for the Minnesota Twins and the closely matched win-loss records, they are slightly favored to cover a...
3 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
58%
over Early game offense can be strong with rested pitchers, and the park conditions at Wrigley Field are generally conducive to scoring. The bett...
3 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
58%
Over |
52%
Minnesota Twins (-1) |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins Based on training data through late 2025, the Twins have shown stronger offensive output and better pitching depth. The Cubs have a competit...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over Both teams have shown above-average run production lately, and Wrigley Field can be hitter-friendly with the right conditions. The rest adva...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Minnesota Twins (-1) The Twins have been winning by multiple runs recently, but the Cubs are resilient at home. A one-run spread is tight; slight lean to the Twi...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Minnesota Twins The first five innings often favor the starting pitcher matchup. Without specific pitcher info, the Twins' overall pitching depth in trainin... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 5/6
Minnesota arrives with superior recent form (4-1 over last 5 vs Cubs' 3-2) and a +12 run differential in that stretch compared to Chicago's...
The Minnesota Twins have shown strong recent form, winning 4 of their last 5 games, while the Chicago Cubs have lost 4 of their last 5. Addi...
Cubs have slightly better recent form indicators in the provided context and benefit from home field at Wrigley. Twins last five show strong...
Based on the provided team form, the Minnesota Twins show significantly better recent performance, winning four of their last five games wit...
The Minnesota Twins and Chicago Cubs have very similar win-loss records, but the Twins' recent form of 4 wins in their last 5 games slightly...
Based on training data through late 2025, the Twins have shown stronger offensive output and better pitching depth. The Cubs have a competit...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/6
Both teams combined for 49 runs in their last 5 matches (9.8 runs per game average). Minnesota scored 28 runs across 5 games while allowing...
Both teams have relatively low team batting averages (.247 for the Twins and .244 for the Cubs), suggesting limited offensive output. Additi...
Wrigley can play neutral to hitter-friendly depending on wind; both lineups have shown scoring in recent samples. Extended rest for both clu...
The Chicago Cubs have been conceding a high number of runs recently (33 in 5 games), indicating potential pitching struggles. The Minnesota...
Wrigley Field is a hitter-friendly park, and the weather forecast indicates moderate temperatures with west winds. While specific pitching m...
Both teams have shown above-average run production lately, and Wrigley Field can be hitter-friendly with the right conditions. The rest adva...
Spread
ConsensusMinnesota Twins -1.5 2/6
Minnesota's +12 run differential and 4-1 form record suggest they should win by more than one run on average. While Wrigley provides a sligh...
The Twins' recent strong form and superior starting pitcher give them an edge, making them likely to cover the -1.5 spread. ([baseball-refer...
Home team typically holds a run advantage at Wrigley; Cubs recent scoring and venue edge support covering a modest spread. No pitcher data a...
Given the Twins' superior recent form, indicated by their strong record and positive run differential, they are well-positioned to not only...
Given the slight edge in recent form for the Minnesota Twins and the closely matched win-loss records, they are slightly favored to cover a...
The Twins have been winning by multiple runs recently, but the Cubs are resilient at home. A one-run spread is tight; slight lean to the Twi...
First 5 innings
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 4/6
Early-game outcomes often reflect starting-pitcher quality and bullpen freshness. Minnesota's dominant last 5 (4-1, +12 differential) indica...
The Twins' strong starting pitcher, Joe Ryan, is likely to keep the Cubs' offense in check during the first five innings, giving the Twins a...
Early innings favor the home starter in most neutral park environments; Cubs hold slight overall edge. Limited platoon or bullpen detail for...
The first five innings are heavily influenced by the starting pitchers and early offensive performance. Given the Twins' overall strong rece...
Early game offense can be strong with rested pitchers, and the park conditions at Wrigley Field are generally conducive to scoring. The bett...
The first five innings often favor the starting pitcher matchup. Without specific pitcher info, the Twins' overall pitching depth in trainin...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Minnesota Twins
GPT-4o Mini
Minnesota Twins
Grok 4 Fast
Chicago Cubs
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Minnesota Twins
DeepSeek V3
Minnesota Twins
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
4a3119ac75bf2245…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Jul 19 · 18:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 13433,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Wrigley Field",
"league": "Major League Baseball",
"starts_at": "2026-07-19T18:20:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 19 Jul 2026 18:20:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Minnesota Twins",
"home": "Chicago Cubs"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWWWL",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 28,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 16
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WWWLL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 21,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 33
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 10,
"home": 10
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.