Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Major League Baseball · Wrigley Field
Upcoming · in 82h 39m
Chicago Cubs logo

Chicago CubsvsLos Angeles Dodgers

Los Angeles Dodgers logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
Los Angeles Dodgers -1.5 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 51% Los Angeles Dodgers -1.5

The Dodgers' +1 run differential advantage over the last 5 games, combined with stronger organizational depth and historical consistency, ju...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% Los Angeles Dodgers -1.5

Dodgers winning by two or more is plausible because Yamamoto suppresses opponent runs while the Dodgers lineup has the power to provide mult...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Los Angeles Dodgers

The Dodgers' superior record and away performance suggest they are likely to cover a -1 spread. Their strong pitching staff, with an ERA of...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Los Angeles Dodgers

Los Angeles maintains a stronger bullpen and starting rotation edge that typically covers run lines on the road. Cubs home form has been inc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Los Angeles Dodgers -1.5

Historically, when the Dodgers win, they often do so by multiple runs due to their potent offense and strong pitching depth, allowing them t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% Los Angeles Dodgers

Given the slight edge for the Dodgers in the head-to-head and their superior pitching, they are more likely to win by a margin of 2 or more...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 45% Los Angeles Dodgers -1.5

The Dodgers are the stronger team and likely to win by at least two runs, but the Cubs are at home and can be competitive. Given the small s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Los Angeles Dodgers 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Los Angeles Dodgers

Both teams show identical recent records (3W-2L) over 5 matches with equal rest, but the Dodgers' superior run differential (+1 GF/GA vs Cub...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Los Angeles Dodgers

Probable-starter research shows the Dodgers are likely to send their ace-level hurler (Yoshinobu Yamamoto) against a Cubs rotation slot occu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Los Angeles Dodgers

The Los Angeles Dodgers have a superior record (67-39) compared to the Chicago Cubs (59-46). Additionally, the Dodgers have a strong away pe...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 57% Los Angeles Dodgers

Dodgers hold superior overall roster depth and pitching staff relative to the Cubs based on historical performance patterns. Wrigley Field f...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Los Angeles Dodgers

Based on general historical team strength and consistency from my training data through 2025-09, the Los Angeles Dodgers typically possess a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Los Angeles Dodgers

The Dodgers have a stronger starting pitcher in Clayton Kershaw compared to Kyle Hendricks. While the Cubs have strong home form recently, t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Los Angeles Dodgers

Training data through 2025-09, so this is based on historical team strength. The Dodgers have been a consistent powerhouse with strong lineu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Over 8.5

Combined offensive output over the last 5 matches averages 4.1 runs per team (41 total runs across 10 team-games), suggesting totals cluster...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% under

An ace start from Yamamoto combined with a quality Imanaga start for the Cubs suggests lower run-scoring early and into the middle innings;...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have strong offenses, with the Dodgers averaging 5.3 runs per game and the Cubs 5.0. Combined with the Dodgers' 3.5 runs allowed...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

August conditions at Wrigley often produce moderate run environments with potential wind assistance. Dodgers offense has historically posted...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Over 8.5

From the provided context, the Cubs have conceded 33 runs in their last 5 games, indicating a trend towards higher-scoring contests. Both te...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over

The weather forecast indicates a moderate breeze blowing out towards right field at Wrigley Field, which typically favors hitters. Both team...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 85% Over 2.5

Baseball games routinely exceed 2.5 runs, and both teams have shown they can score. In recent games, the Cubs and Dodgers combine for high r...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Los Angeles Dodgers 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Los Angeles Dodgers

Early-game advantages often correlate with starter quality and early bullpen availability. The Dodgers' edge in organizational pitching dept...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Los Angeles Dodgers

With an elite starter (Yamamoto) expected to go multiple innings at a high quality and Imanaga a solid but slightly less dominant counter, t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Los Angeles Dodgers

The Dodgers' strong offense and pitching suggest they will lead after the first five innings. Their away performance and recent form further...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Los Angeles Dodgers

Early game advantage tilts slightly to the Dodgers due to stronger top-of-order production against right-handed starters. Cubs have struggle...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 57% Los Angeles Dodgers

The Dodgers typically boast elite starting pitching within their historical framework, giving them a significant advantage through the first...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Los Angeles Dodgers

The Dodgers' advantage with starting pitcher Clayton Kershaw is most pronounced in the early innings. Their ability to get ahead early and l...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Los Angeles Dodgers

First five innings are heavily influenced by starting pitching, and the Dodgers historically have stronger starting rotations. However, the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Los Angeles Dodgers

65
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Los Angeles Dodgers

62
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Los Angeles Dodgers

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Los Angeles Dodgers

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Los Angeles Dodgers

57
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Los Angeles Dodgers

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Los Angeles Dodgers

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1032–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: fef8af3c76aad40d…
Kickoff
Wed, Aug 5 · 18:20 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 20696,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Wrigley Field",
        "league": "Major League Baseball",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-05T18:20:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Wed, 05 Aug 2026 18:20:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Los Angeles Dodgers",
        "home": "Chicago Cubs"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "WLWLW",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 20,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 19
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WWWLL",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 21,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 33
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 27,
            "home": 27
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →