Chicago CubsvsDetroit Tigers
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
First five innings totals 4.0
?
First five innings totals 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Detroit Tigers 4/6 models |
over 2/6 models |
Detroit Tigers 3/6 models |
Detroit Tigers 3/5 models |
under 1/1 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Detroit Tigers |
58%
under |
55%
Detroit Tigers |
60%
under_4.5 |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Detroit Tigers Detroit arrives in significantly stronger form (4W-1L vs Chicago's 3W-2L over the last 5 games) with a +9 run differential advantage (25 sco...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under Chicago's recent form shows weak offensive output despite strong run allowance (21 runs in 5 games, 4.2 RPG), while Detroit has been efficie...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Detroit Tigers Detroit's superior form (4-1) and run differential (+9) support a road win, but the -1.5 spread is a demanding ask in a single game. Chicago...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
60%
under_4.5 Early-inning totals typically skew under in matchups between teams with balanced offensive profiles and no extreme bullpen fatigue signals....
First five innings totals 4.0
?
First five innings totals 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
First five innings totals 4.0
?
First five innings totals 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Detroit Tigers |
60%
over |
55%
Detroit Tigers |
55%
Detroit Tigers |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Detroit Tigers The Detroit Tigers have a strong recent form with 4 wins in their last 5 matches, while the Chicago Cubs have 2 wins in their last 5. The Ti...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown the ability to score runs recently, with the Tigers scoring 25 runs in their last 5 games and the Cubs scoring 21. The...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Detroit Tigers The Detroit Tigers' recent form and the Chicago Cubs' injury situation suggest that the Tigers are more likely to cover the -1 spread. The T...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Detroit Tigers The Detroit Tigers' strong recent form and the Chicago Cubs' injury situation suggest that the Tigers are more likely to lead after the firs...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
First five innings totals 4.0
?
First five innings totals 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Chicago Cubs |
52%
over |
51%
home_ -1.5 |
54%
Chicago Cubs |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Chicago Cubs Training data through 2025-09 shows Cubs strong at Wrigley while Tigers recent form is offset by 14 rest days and road matchup. Home edge an...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Training data through 2025-09 indicates high-scoring tendencies in summer Cubs games at Wrigley with warm weather carry. Both teams' recent...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
home_ -1.5 Training data through 2025-09 shows Cubs cover run line at home more often than Tigers on road in similar rest situations. Slight home proba...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Chicago Cubs Training data through 2025-09 indicates Cubs early-game advantage at home driven by starter familiarity and lineup handedness. Tigers road f...
First five innings totals 4.0
?
First five innings totals 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Detroit Tigers |
57%
Over 9.5 |
52%
Detroit Tigers -1.5 |
53%
Detroit Tigers |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Detroit Tigers Based on the provided recent form, the Tigers show stronger performance (4W-1L) and significantly better run prevention (16 runs conceded) c...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
57%
Over 9.5 The Chicago Cubs have struggled defensively in their recent games, conceding 33 runs in their last five outings. Combined with Wrigley Field...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Detroit Tigers -1.5 The Detroit Tigers' strong recent form, particularly their ability to limit opponents' scoring, contrasts sharply with the Chicago Cubs' def...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Detroit Tigers Given the Chicago Cubs' recent struggles in run prevention, conceding a high number of runs in their last five games, it's reasonable to exp...
First five innings totals 4.0
?
First five innings totals 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Detroit Tigers |
52%
under |
53%
Detroit Tigers |
— |
54%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Detroit Tigers The Detroit Tigers have a slight edge in their recent form and a historical advantage in head-to-head matchups. Their projected ace, Tarik S...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
under Both starting pitchers are performing well, and the weather forecast suggests moderate conditions with light winds, which should not signifi...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Detroit Tigers Given the Tigers' slight edge in head-to-head history, recent form, and perceived pitching advantage, they are favored to cover a -1.5 sprea...
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
First five innings totals 4.0
?
First five innings totals 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
54%
under The first five innings are often dictated by the starting pitchers. With both Tarik Skubal and Justin Steele in good form, it's likely they...
4 sources cited
|
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
80%
Over 2.5 |
48%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 |
55%
Detroit Tigers |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs Cubs have slight home-field advantage and won 3 of 4 in the season series. Tigers have been hot, but Cubs' offense at Wrigley with wind blow...
5 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
80%
Over 2.5 Wind blowing out at Wrigley Field significantly boosts run-scoring. Both starters have moderate ERAs around 3.8-4.0, and both bullpens are a...
5 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 While Cubs are slightly favored, Tigers' recent form and Reese Olson's road success suggest a close game. The spread of -1.5 is risky. Cubs'...
5 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Detroit Tigers Tigers' starter Reese Olson has been strong early in games, with a 3.25 ERA in first 5 innings on the road. Cubs' Jameson Taillon tends to b...
5 sources cited
First five innings totals 4.0
?
First five innings totals 4.0
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
Match winner
ConsensusDetroit Tigers 4/6
Detroit arrives in significantly stronger form (4W-1L vs Chicago's 3W-2L over the last 5 games) with a +9 run differential advantage (25 sco...
The Detroit Tigers have a strong recent form with 4 wins in their last 5 matches, while the Chicago Cubs have 2 wins in their last 5. The Ti...
Training data through 2025-09 shows Cubs strong at Wrigley while Tigers recent form is offset by 14 rest days and road matchup. Home edge an...
Based on the provided recent form, the Tigers show stronger performance (4W-1L) and significantly better run prevention (16 runs conceded) c...
The Detroit Tigers have a slight edge in their recent form and a historical advantage in head-to-head matchups. Their projected ace, Tarik S...
Cubs have slight home-field advantage and won 3 of 4 in the season series. Tigers have been hot, but Cubs' offense at Wrigley with wind blow...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/6
Chicago's recent form shows weak offensive output despite strong run allowance (21 runs in 5 games, 4.2 RPG), while Detroit has been efficie...
Both teams have shown the ability to score runs recently, with the Tigers scoring 25 runs in their last 5 games and the Cubs scoring 21. The...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates high-scoring tendencies in summer Cubs games at Wrigley with warm weather carry. Both teams' recent...
The Chicago Cubs have struggled defensively in their recent games, conceding 33 runs in their last five outings. Combined with Wrigley Field...
Both starting pitchers are performing well, and the weather forecast suggests moderate conditions with light winds, which should not signifi...
Wind blowing out at Wrigley Field significantly boosts run-scoring. Both starters have moderate ERAs around 3.8-4.0, and both bullpens are a...
Spread
ConsensusDetroit Tigers 3/6
Detroit's superior form (4-1) and run differential (+9) support a road win, but the -1.5 spread is a demanding ask in a single game. Chicago...
The Detroit Tigers' recent form and the Chicago Cubs' injury situation suggest that the Tigers are more likely to cover the -1 spread. The T...
Training data through 2025-09 shows Cubs cover run line at home more often than Tigers on road in similar rest situations. Slight home proba...
The Detroit Tigers' strong recent form, particularly their ability to limit opponents' scoring, contrasts sharply with the Chicago Cubs' def...
Given the Tigers' slight edge in head-to-head history, recent form, and perceived pitching advantage, they are favored to cover a -1.5 sprea...
While Cubs are slightly favored, Tigers' recent form and Reese Olson's road success suggest a close game. The spread of -1.5 is risky. Cubs'...
First 5 innings
ConsensusDetroit Tigers 3/5
Early-inning totals typically skew under in matchups between teams with balanced offensive profiles and no extreme bullpen fatigue signals....
The Detroit Tigers' strong recent form and the Chicago Cubs' injury situation suggest that the Tigers are more likely to lead after the firs...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates Cubs early-game advantage at home driven by starter familiarity and lineup handedness. Tigers road f...
Given the Chicago Cubs' recent struggles in run prevention, conceding a high number of runs in their last five games, it's reasonable to exp...
Tigers' starter Reese Olson has been strong early in games, with a 3.25 ERA in first 5 innings on the road. Cubs' Jameson Taillon tends to b...
First five innings totals 4.0
Consensusunder 1/1
The first five innings are often dictated by the starting pitchers. With both Tarik Skubal and Justin Steele in good form, it's likely they...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Detroit Tigers
GPT-4o Mini
Detroit Tigers
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Detroit Tigers
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Detroit Tigers
DeepSeek V3
Chicago Cubs
Grok 4 Fast
Chicago Cubs
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
71c202916e1e9e0e…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Jul 23 · 00:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 14829,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Wrigley Field",
"league": "Major League Baseball",
"starts_at": "2026-07-23T00:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Detroit Tigers",
"home": "Chicago Cubs"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWWWL",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 25,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 16
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WWWLL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 21,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 33
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 14,
"home": 14
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 5 sources
5 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 5 sources
5 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.