Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 2–5
Chicago Cubs logo

Chicago CubsvsColorado Rockies

Colorado Rockies logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final2–5 Locked 28picks · 17 graded
Recap Consensus missed

Chicago Cubs 2–5 Colorado Rockies

All 7 AIs backed Chicago Cubs — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
Chicago Cubs 7/7
Correct calls
0/7
Final
2–5

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Over L

Both teams have competent offenses, and Wrigley Field is historically a hitter-friendly park that can produce runs. Without knowledge of sta...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over W

Both teams have shown inconsistent offensive performances, with the Cubs averaging 4.5 runs per game and the Rockies 4.3. However, given the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% over

Rockies offenses tend to inflate run totals on the road while Cubs pitching staff allows moderate scoring. Training knowledge indicates aver...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Over 8.5 L

Assuming a typical MLB total line of 8.5 runs, leaning over is a reasonable pick given the offensive environment of Major League Baseball in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over L

Both teams have the potential to score runs, and while the Rockies' offense can be streaky, they can also put up big numbers. The Cubs' offe...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Under 9.5

Wrigley Field can play as a neutral-to-pitcher-friendly park depending on weather. Both teams have inconsistent offenses, with the Rockies'...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Chicago Cubs L

The Cubs are historically the stronger franchise and typically field a more competitive roster than the Rockies. However, without access to...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Chicago Cubs L

The Chicago Cubs have a home record of 20-15, while the Colorado Rockies have an away record of 12-23. The Cubs have also won their last two...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 73% Chicago Cubs L

Cubs have historically been the stronger franchise with better pitching and offense compared to the perennial bottom-feeder Rockies. Trainin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 62% Chicago Cubs L

Based on historical team performance, the Chicago Cubs generally maintain a stronger roster and perform better, especially at home. The Colo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% Chicago Cubs L

Based on general knowledge of team performance and historical trends, the Chicago Cubs are typically favored at home against the Colorado Ro...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Chicago Cubs L

Based on training data through 2025, the Cubs have a stronger roster and home-field advantage at Wrigley Field. The Rockies struggle on the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Chicago Cubs -1.5 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Chicago Cubs -1.5 L

A -1.5 spread favors the Cubs by a run and a half, reflecting their home status and structural advantage. This is a tight line, suggesting m...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs L

The Cubs' home advantage and the Rockies' away struggles suggest a narrow Cubs victory. The Cubs have a home record of 20-15, while the Rock...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 68% Chicago Cubs

Chicago favored by multiple runs on talent differential alone. Rockies struggle to cover spreads on the road per historical patterns in trai...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 48% Chicago Cubs -1.5 L

If the Chicago Cubs win, there's a good probability they will do so by more than a single run, especially against a weaker road opponent. Ba...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Colorado Rockies W

While the Cubs are favored to win (h2h), covering a -1.5 spread requires a more dominant performance. The Rockies have shown they can keep g...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 50% Chicago Cubs -1.5 L

The Cubs are favored to win by at least two runs given home advantage and Rockies' road woes. However, baseball is volatile, and one-run gam...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Chicago Cubs

Early-inning play often mirrors overall match tendencies, and the Cubs' home advantage and stronger roster should provide a slight edge in t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs have a home record of 20-15, while the Rockies have an away record of 12-23. The Cubs have also won their last two games, whereas t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 65% Chicago Cubs

Cubs starters typically stronger early, limiting Rockies scoring in first five frames based on career trends. Training knowledge shows home...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Chicago Cubs F5

The Chicago Cubs, as the generally stronger home team, are expected to establish an early lead over the Colorado Rockies. The Rockies' road...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs are generally stronger in the early innings at home, with their starting pitchers often performing well and their lineup capable of...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Chicago Cubs

Cubs' starting pitcher is expected to have an edge over the Rockies' starter based on general talent. Early innings favor the home team with...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Chicago Cubs

73
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Chicago Cubs

65
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Chicago Cubs

65
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Chicago Cubs

62
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Chicago Cubs

60
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Chicago Cubs

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Chicago Cubs

58

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: a279a3f4612d6477…
Kickoff
Wed, Jun 17 · 00:05 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 2838,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-17T00:05:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:05:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Colorado Rockies",
        "home": "Chicago Cubs"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-14T09:05:52+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini
    4 tool calls · 4 sources

    4 citations captured — unlock with Pro

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →