Chicago CubsvsAtlanta Braves
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Chicago Cubs 2/4 models |
over 2/4 models |
home_ -1.5 1/4 models |
Atlanta Braves 2/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
54%
Chicago Cubs |
51%
over |
48%
home_ -1.5 |
52%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
Chicago Cubs Training data through 2025-09 shows Cubs hold slight home edge at Wrigley even against stronger road teams. Braves recent form is mixed whil...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Training data through 2025-09 indicates Wrigley can play neutral to hitter-friendly in September. Both teams average above league run totals...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
home_ -1.5 Training data through 2025-09 shows Cubs cover the run line at home more often than road teams in this matchup window. Braves offense has be...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Chicago Cubs Training data through 2025-09 shows Cubs frequently lead after five at Wrigley. Early game tends to favor home starter before bullpens enter... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Atlanta Braves |
53%
Over 8.5 |
55%
Atlanta Braves -1.5 |
57%
Atlanta Braves |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Atlanta Braves Based on general team strength and historical performance, the Atlanta Braves typically have an edge over the Chicago Cubs. Without specific...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Over 8.5 Wrigley Field historically favors offense, and the Atlanta Braves possess a potent lineup capable of scoring runs. While specific weather an...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Atlanta Braves -1.5 The Atlanta Braves, as the generally stronger team, are often capable of winning by multiple runs when they secure a victory. If they establ...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
57%
Atlanta Braves The Atlanta Braves consistently feature strong starting pitching and potent offenses that can get on the board early in games. In a first fi... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
Atlanta Braves |
55%
over |
53%
Atlanta Braves |
56%
Atlanta Braves |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Atlanta Braves The Atlanta Braves have a superior record and stronger overall team performance this season. Their offense is more consistent, and their pit...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown decent offensive capabilities, and while Wrigley Field can be a pitcher's park, the combined run-scoring potential of...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Atlanta Braves Given the slight edge the Braves have in overall team strength and pitching, they are more likely to win by more than one run. While the Cub...
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
56%
Atlanta Braves The Braves tend to start strong offensively, and their starting pitcher is likely to perform well against the Cubs' lineup in the early inni...
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
54%
Chicago Cubs |
54%
Over 8.5 |
30%
Cubs -1.5 |
52%
Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
Chicago Cubs No live access at prediction time, so this is based on training knowledge through 2025 with the Cubs as a strong 90+ win roster and the Brav...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Over 8.5 Wrigley in mid-September typically plays with a wind factor that is a coin flip, but both offenses are top-third in MLB and neither bullpen...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
30%
Cubs -1.5 Same-game run line is a low-probability bet for any favorite; even a strong home team covers -1.5 only about 30-33% of the time. Given the C...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Cubs First-five markets isolate the starters, and I have the Cubs' rotation (Steele/Imanaga/Brown) as marginally better than Atlanta's current fr... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusChicago Cubs 2/4
Training data through 2025-09 shows Cubs hold slight home edge at Wrigley even against stronger road teams. Braves recent form is mixed whil...
Based on general team strength and historical performance, the Atlanta Braves typically have an edge over the Chicago Cubs. Without specific...
The Atlanta Braves have a superior record and stronger overall team performance this season. Their offense is more consistent, and their pit...
No live access at prediction time, so this is based on training knowledge through 2025 with the Cubs as a strong 90+ win roster and the Brav...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/4
Training data through 2025-09 indicates Wrigley can play neutral to hitter-friendly in September. Both teams average above league run totals...
Wrigley Field historically favors offense, and the Atlanta Braves possess a potent lineup capable of scoring runs. While specific weather an...
Both teams have shown decent offensive capabilities, and while Wrigley Field can be a pitcher's park, the combined run-scoring potential of...
Wrigley in mid-September typically plays with a wind factor that is a coin flip, but both offenses are top-third in MLB and neither bullpen...
Spread
Consensushome_ -1.5 1/4
Training data through 2025-09 shows Cubs cover the run line at home more often than road teams in this matchup window. Braves offense has be...
The Atlanta Braves, as the generally stronger team, are often capable of winning by multiple runs when they secure a victory. If they establ...
Given the slight edge the Braves have in overall team strength and pitching, they are more likely to win by more than one run. While the Cub...
Same-game run line is a low-probability bet for any favorite; even a strong home team covers -1.5 only about 30-33% of the time. Given the C...
First 5 innings
ConsensusAtlanta Braves 2/4
Training data through 2025-09 shows Cubs frequently lead after five at Wrigley. Early game tends to favor home starter before bullpens enter...
The Atlanta Braves consistently feature strong starting pitching and potent offenses that can get on the board early in games. In a first fi...
The Braves tend to start strong offensively, and their starting pitcher is likely to perform well against the Cubs' lineup in the early inni...
First-five markets isolate the starters, and I have the Cubs' rotation (Steele/Imanaga/Brown) as marginally better than Atlanta's current fr...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Atlanta Braves
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Atlanta Braves
Grok 4 Fast
Chicago Cubs
DeepSeek V3
Chicago Cubs
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
b6e68af6fb9d69a6…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 16 · 23:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 43239,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Wrigley Field",
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-09-16T23:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 16 Sep 2026 23:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Atlanta Braves",
"home": "Chicago Cubs"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WLLLW",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 36,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 32
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WWWLL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 21,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 33
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 70,
"home": 70
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.