Chicago BlackhawksvsMinnesota Wild
MWYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Minnesota Wild 4/4 models |
over 2/4 models |
Minnesota Wild 2/4 models |
Minnesota Wild 2/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Minnesota Wild |
51%
over |
52%
Minnesota Wild |
50%
Minnesota Wild |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Minnesota Wild This is a 2026 matchup with no live data available. Training knowledge through 2024 shows Minnesota typically stronger than a rebuilding Chi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Training data through 2024 shows average NHL totals around 6.2-6.5. United Center tends to play higher scoring. Future game lacks specific t...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Minnesota Wild Puckline favors the better team on the road in training data. Minnesota's edge makes +1.5 or straight spread value lean away. Chicago strugg...
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
50%
Minnesota Wild First periods in NHL are low scoring and often draw-heavy per historical patterns. Slight away lean based on Minnesota's road start tendenci... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Minnesota Wild |
52%
Over 6.0 |
55%
Chicago Blackhawks +1.5 |
38%
Draw |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Wild Based on historical team strengths prior to my knowledge cutoff, the Minnesota Wild have generally been a more competitive and defensively s...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 6.0 NHL games often feature moderate scoring, and a line of 6.0 goals is often a competitive mark. While the Wild are known for defensive play,...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Chicago Blackhawks +1.5 Although the Minnesota Wild are generally a stronger team, winning by more than one goal on the road can be challenging, especially against...
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
38%
Draw First periods in NHL games are often tight as teams adjust to the pace and opponent's strategies. Both the Wild and Blackhawks have historic... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Minnesota Wild |
60%
over |
58%
Minnesota Wild |
55%
Minnesota Wild |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Minnesota Wild Based on training data through early 2026, the Minnesota Wild generally held a superior roster and performed better against the Chicago Blac...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over As of my last training data, NHL games, particularly those involving teams with offensive potential like the Wild, often saw a moderate to h...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Minnesota Wild Given the slight historical edge for the Minnesota Wild in head-to-head matchups and their generally stronger team composition according to...
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
55%
Minnesota Wild Teams with a stronger overall roster often start games with more intensity, leading to an early advantage. Based on the historical strength... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Minnesota Wild |
53%
Over 5.5 |
31%
Minnesota Wild -1.5 |
52%
Under 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Wild Without live access, this is predicted from training data through 2025-09 plus typical preseason dynamics. Minnesota has generally been the...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Over 5.5 Training-data knowledge through 2025-09 suggests both clubs have enough offensive skill and defensive question marks to push this into the s...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
31%
Minnesota Wild -1.5 The moneyline lean toward Minnesota does not translate into a strong -1.5 pick because preseason and early-season games tend to be tight and...
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
52%
Under 1.5 First periods in early-season and preseason NHL games often start cautiously, with teams feeling each other out and goaltenders sharp before... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusMinnesota Wild 4/4
This is a 2026 matchup with no live data available. Training knowledge through 2024 shows Minnesota typically stronger than a rebuilding Chi...
Based on historical team strengths prior to my knowledge cutoff, the Minnesota Wild have generally been a more competitive and defensively s...
Based on training data through early 2026, the Minnesota Wild generally held a superior roster and performed better against the Chicago Blac...
Without live access, this is predicted from training data through 2025-09 plus typical preseason dynamics. Minnesota has generally been the...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/4
Training data through 2024 shows average NHL totals around 6.2-6.5. United Center tends to play higher scoring. Future game lacks specific t...
NHL games often feature moderate scoring, and a line of 6.0 goals is often a competitive mark. While the Wild are known for defensive play,...
As of my last training data, NHL games, particularly those involving teams with offensive potential like the Wild, often saw a moderate to h...
Training-data knowledge through 2025-09 suggests both clubs have enough offensive skill and defensive question marks to push this into the s...
Spread
ConsensusMinnesota Wild 2/4
Puckline favors the better team on the road in training data. Minnesota's edge makes +1.5 or straight spread value lean away. Chicago strugg...
Although the Minnesota Wild are generally a stronger team, winning by more than one goal on the road can be challenging, especially against...
Given the slight historical edge for the Minnesota Wild in head-to-head matchups and their generally stronger team composition according to...
The moneyline lean toward Minnesota does not translate into a strong -1.5 pick because preseason and early-season games tend to be tight and...
First period winner
ConsensusMinnesota Wild 2/4
First periods in NHL are low scoring and often draw-heavy per historical patterns. Slight away lean based on Minnesota's road start tendenci...
First periods in NHL games are often tight as teams adjust to the pace and opponent's strategies. Both the Wild and Blackhawks have historic...
Teams with a stronger overall roster often start games with more intensity, leading to an early advantage. Based on the historical strength...
First periods in early-season and preseason NHL games often start cautiously, with teams feeling each other out and goaltenders sharp before...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Minnesota Wild
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Minnesota Wild
DeepSeek V3
Minnesota Wild
Grok 4 Fast
Minnesota Wild
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
6e4fa516d79eb83e…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 22 · 00:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First period winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_period
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 44823,
"sport": "ice-hockey",
"venue": "United Center",
"league": "NHL",
"starts_at": "2026-09-22T00:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Minnesota Wild",
"home": "Chicago Blackhawks"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Confirm the starting goaltender and their recent save% — a backup or a cold starter swings the line and total.",
"Special teams decide tight games: compare power-play and penalty-kill percentages.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause goalie/skater fatigue — flag the schedule spot.",
"Weigh recent scoring trends and home/road splits; injuries to top-six forwards or a top pairing matter most."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_period"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.