Carolina CorevsFC Cincinnati II
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
8 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Carolina Core 5/5 models |
Carolina Core 5/5 models |
over 5/5 models |
2-1 4/5 models |
yes 5/5 models |
Carolina Core 4/5 models |
Carolina Core 1/5 models |
Carolina Core / Carolina Core 2/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
65%
Carolina Core |
70%
Carolina Core |
60%
over |
25%
2-1 |
55%
yes |
60%
Carolina Core |
60%
Carolina Core |
55%
Carolina Core / Carolina Core |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Carolina Core Carolina Core FC has a strong home record with 5 wins, 4 draws, and 3 losses, while FC Cincinnati II has struggled away, with 0 wins, 4 draw...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
70%
Carolina Core Given Carolina Core FC's superior home form and FC Cincinnati II's poor away record, a draw-no-bet on the home team offers a favorable risk-...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown a tendency for matches with over 2.5 goals, with Carolina Core FC averaging 3.3 goals per match and FC Cincinnati II a...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
25%
2-1 Considering both teams' scoring tendencies and defensive records, a 2-1 home victory is the most likely outcome.
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Both teams have a history of matches where both teams scored, with Carolina Core FC having a 70% BTTS rate and FC Cincinnati II having an 80...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Carolina Core Carolina Core FC's strong home form and FC Cincinnati II's poor away record suggest a likely home victory by at least one goal.
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
60%
Carolina Core Carolina Core FC's strong home form and FC Cincinnati II's poor away record suggest a likely home victory by at least one goal.
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
55%
Carolina Core / Carolina Core Carolina Core FC's strong home form and FC Cincinnati II's poor away record suggest a likely home victory both at halftime and fulltime.
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Carolina Core |
58%
Carolina Core |
53%
over |
18%
2-1 |
55%
yes |
48%
home_ -1 |
52%
home_ -0.5 |
38%
home_home |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Carolina Core Carolina Core hold superior recent form (WDLWD) and 14 rest days versus FC Cincinnati II's LLLLD and only 3 rest days. Home side's defensive...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
58%
Carolina Core Home side's better record and extra recovery time make them the clearer side to back without the draw risk. Away side's poor away results (0...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over MLS Next Pro matches often produce goals; home side's attack (11 scored) and away side's leaky defense (19 conceded) support over 2.5. Rest...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
2-1 Expected scoreline reflects home control with both sides likely to score given defensive frailties. 2-1 captures the most common outcome und...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Both teams show attacking output and defensive vulnerabilities, especially the visitors. Home side's 11 goals scored in 5 matches suggests t...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
home_ -1 Home edge is real but not overwhelming; spread at -1 carries risk given the draw probability. Away side's recent results are poor but they r...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
52%
home_ -0.5 Home side's rest and form advantages translate to a half-goal edge on Asian handicap. Away side's four straight losses increase the chance o...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
38%
home_home Home side likely to control the match from the start given rest advantage and better defensive organization. Second-half continuation of hom... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
68%
Carolina Core |
85%
Carolina Core |
78%
over |
18%
3-1 |
58%
yes |
72%
Carolina Core |
68%
Carolina Core -1.25 |
48%
Carolina Core / Carolina Core |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Carolina Core Carolina Core is in strong form with 2 wins and 2 draws in their last 5 matches, contrasting sharply with FC Cincinnati II's dire record of...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
85%
Carolina Core Removing the draw outcome further strengthens the prediction for a Carolina Core victory given their dominant form and rest advantage. FC Ci...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
78%
over FC Cincinnati II has conceded an alarming 19 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 3.8 goals against per game, while also scoring 7 thems...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
3-1 Given Carolina Core's consistent scoring (11 goals in 5 games) and FC Cincinnati II's exceptionally leaky defense (19 goals conceded in 5 ga...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
58%
yes While FC Cincinnati II has been conceding heavily, they have managed to score in 3 of their last 5 matches, indicating some attacking threat...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
72%
Carolina Core For Carolina Core to cover the -1 spread, they need to win by two goals or more. Given FC Cincinnati II's dreadful defensive record of 19 go...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
68%
Carolina Core -1.25 Carolina Core is expected to win comfortably, making the 'home -1.25' Asian Handicap a strong pick. FC Cincinnati II's poor form, particular...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
48%
Carolina Core / Carolina Core Considering Carolina Core's strong form, home advantage, and the poor defensive record of FC Cincinnati II, it is highly probable that Carol... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Carolina Core |
70%
Carolina Core |
55%
over |
15%
2-1 |
55%
yes |
60%
Carolina Core |
70%
home_ 0.0 |
55%
home_home |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Carolina Core Carolina Core has a significantly better recent home record (2W-2D-1L) compared to FC Cincinnati II's abysmal away form (0W-1D-4L with only...
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
70%
Carolina Core Given Carolina Core's superior home form and FC Cincinnati II's struggles, the home team is the clear favorite. The draw no bet market accou...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Carolina Core has a strong attacking record at home (11 goals in 5 games), and FC Cincinnati II has conceded heavily on the road (19 in 5 ga...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
2-1 Considering Carolina Core's strong home attack and FC Cincinnati II's poor defense, a scoreline where Carolina Core scores multiple goals se...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Carolina Core has a potent home attack, and FC Cincinnati II, despite their struggles, have managed to score in some away games. Given Cinci...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Carolina Core Carolina Core's strong home form and FC Cincinnati II's poor away results suggest that Carolina Core can secure a win by at least one goal....
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
70%
home_ 0.0 Carolina Core's superior form and home advantage make them the strong favorite. The 0.0 Asian Handicap offers a good balance, effectively be...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
55%
home_home Carolina Core's strong home form and tendency to start well suggest they will lead at halftime and maintain that advantage to win the match....
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
50%
Carolina Core |
55%
Carolina Core |
55%
over |
12%
2-1 |
60%
yes |
45%
Carolina Core |
45%
Carolina Core -1.0 |
20%
draw_home |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
50%
Carolina Core Carolina Core have been more consistent at home with 2 wins in their last 5, while FC Cincinnati II are winless in 5. However, the quality g...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
Carolina Core With the draw removed, Carolina Core's home form and superior rest give them an edge. FC Cincinnati II's poor run and potential fatigue from...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games: Carolina Core scored 11 in their last 5 and conceded 9; FC Cincinnati II scored 7 but c...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
12%
2-1 The most likely outcome is a narrow home win, with 2-1 the most plausible given both defenses are weak. FC Cincinnati II have scored in most...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
yes FC Cincinnati II have scored in most matches despite losses, while Carolina Core have scored consistently at home. Both defenses are leaky,...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
45%
Carolina Core Carolina Core are favored but not dominant; a -1 spread means they need to win by 2 or more. Given their moderate form and FC Cincinnati II'...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
45%
Carolina Core -1.0 Similar to the spread, Carolina Core need to win by 2 for a full win on the -1.0 line. Their home form is decent but not dominant, and FC Ci...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
20%
draw_home This market is volatile, but Carolina Core's better fitness and home advantage may lead to a first-half stalemate before they pull ahead. FC... |
|||||||||
Match winner
ConsensusCarolina Core 5/5
Carolina Core FC has a strong home record with 5 wins, 4 draws, and 3 losses, while FC Cincinnati II has struggled away, with 0 wins, 4 draw...
Carolina Core hold superior recent form (WDLWD) and 14 rest days versus FC Cincinnati II's LLLLD and only 3 rest days. Home side's defensive...
Carolina Core is in strong form with 2 wins and 2 draws in their last 5 matches, contrasting sharply with FC Cincinnati II's dire record of...
Carolina Core has a significantly better recent home record (2W-2D-1L) compared to FC Cincinnati II's abysmal away form (0W-1D-4L with only...
Carolina Core have been more consistent at home with 2 wins in their last 5, while FC Cincinnati II are winless in 5. However, the quality g...
Draw no bet
ConsensusCarolina Core 5/5
Given Carolina Core FC's superior home form and FC Cincinnati II's poor away record, a draw-no-bet on the home team offers a favorable risk-...
Home side's better record and extra recovery time make them the clearer side to back without the draw risk. Away side's poor away results (0...
Removing the draw outcome further strengthens the prediction for a Carolina Core victory given their dominant form and rest advantage. FC Ci...
Given Carolina Core's superior home form and FC Cincinnati II's struggles, the home team is the clear favorite. The draw no bet market accou...
With the draw removed, Carolina Core's home form and superior rest give them an edge. FC Cincinnati II's poor run and potential fatigue from...
Over / Under
Consensusover 5/5
Both teams have shown a tendency for matches with over 2.5 goals, with Carolina Core FC averaging 3.3 goals per match and FC Cincinnati II a...
MLS Next Pro matches often produce goals; home side's attack (11 scored) and away side's leaky defense (19 conceded) support over 2.5. Rest...
FC Cincinnati II has conceded an alarming 19 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 3.8 goals against per game, while also scoring 7 thems...
Carolina Core has a strong attacking record at home (11 goals in 5 games), and FC Cincinnati II has conceded heavily on the road (19 in 5 ga...
Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games: Carolina Core scored 11 in their last 5 and conceded 9; FC Cincinnati II scored 7 but c...
Correct score
Consensus2-1 4/5
Considering both teams' scoring tendencies and defensive records, a 2-1 home victory is the most likely outcome.
Expected scoreline reflects home control with both sides likely to score given defensive frailties. 2-1 captures the most common outcome und...
Given Carolina Core's consistent scoring (11 goals in 5 games) and FC Cincinnati II's exceptionally leaky defense (19 goals conceded in 5 ga...
Considering Carolina Core's strong home attack and FC Cincinnati II's poor defense, a scoreline where Carolina Core scores multiple goals se...
The most likely outcome is a narrow home win, with 2-1 the most plausible given both defenses are weak. FC Cincinnati II have scored in most...
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 5/5
Both teams have a history of matches where both teams scored, with Carolina Core FC having a 70% BTTS rate and FC Cincinnati II having an 80...
Both teams show attacking output and defensive vulnerabilities, especially the visitors. Home side's 11 goals scored in 5 matches suggests t...
While FC Cincinnati II has been conceding heavily, they have managed to score in 3 of their last 5 matches, indicating some attacking threat...
Carolina Core has a potent home attack, and FC Cincinnati II, despite their struggles, have managed to score in some away games. Given Cinci...
FC Cincinnati II have scored in most matches despite losses, while Carolina Core have scored consistently at home. Both defenses are leaky,...
Spread
ConsensusCarolina Core 4/5
Carolina Core FC's strong home form and FC Cincinnati II's poor away record suggest a likely home victory by at least one goal.
Home edge is real but not overwhelming; spread at -1 carries risk given the draw probability. Away side's recent results are poor but they r...
For Carolina Core to cover the -1 spread, they need to win by two goals or more. Given FC Cincinnati II's dreadful defensive record of 19 go...
Carolina Core's strong home form and FC Cincinnati II's poor away results suggest that Carolina Core can secure a win by at least one goal....
Carolina Core are favored but not dominant; a -1 spread means they need to win by 2 or more. Given their moderate form and FC Cincinnati II'...
Asian handicap
ConsensusCarolina Core 1/5
Carolina Core FC's strong home form and FC Cincinnati II's poor away record suggest a likely home victory by at least one goal.
Home side's rest and form advantages translate to a half-goal edge on Asian handicap. Away side's four straight losses increase the chance o...
Carolina Core is expected to win comfortably, making the 'home -1.25' Asian Handicap a strong pick. FC Cincinnati II's poor form, particular...
Carolina Core's superior form and home advantage make them the strong favorite. The 0.0 Asian Handicap offers a good balance, effectively be...
Similar to the spread, Carolina Core need to win by 2 for a full win on the -1.0 line. Their home form is decent but not dominant, and FC Ci...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusCarolina Core / Carolina Core 2/5
Carolina Core FC's strong home form and FC Cincinnati II's poor away record suggest a likely home victory both at halftime and fulltime.
Home side likely to control the match from the start given rest advantage and better defensive organization. Second-half continuation of hom...
Considering Carolina Core's strong form, home advantage, and the poor defensive record of FC Cincinnati II, it is highly probable that Carol...
Carolina Core's strong home form and tendency to start well suggest they will lead at halftime and maintain that advantage to win the match....
This market is volatile, but Carolina Core's better fitness and home advantage may lead to a first-half stalemate before they pull ahead. FC...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Carolina Core
GPT-4o Mini
Carolina Core
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Carolina Core
Grok 4 Fast
Carolina Core
DeepSeek V3
Carolina Core
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Call the exact final score
Free account. Pick the exact final score, lock it before kickoff, beat the AI consensus across the WC and win a lifetime free plan.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
e0904ec5dd608b47…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 22 · 23:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 29729,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Truist Point",
"league": "MLS Next Pro",
"starts_at": "2026-08-22T23:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 22 Aug 2026 23:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "FC Cincinnati II",
"home": "Carolina Core"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LLLLD",
"record": "0W-1D-4L",
"scored": 7,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 19
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WDLWD",
"record": "2W-2D-1L",
"scored": 11,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 9
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 3,
"home": 14
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
8 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.