Carolina AlvesvsLeolia Jeanjean
LJAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 2.5 3/10 models |
Carolina Alves 3/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Leolia Jeanjean |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Best-of-three matches between players of similar tier (Jeanjean favored but not dominant) tend to go the distance. Alves is competitive enou...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Leolia Jeanjean Leolia Jeanjean is a more established WTA player with superior ranking and consistency on hard courts (the presumed surface for the Kia Open... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
under |
53%
Carolina Alves |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under Training data through 2025-09 shows lower-ranked players often produce straight-set matches on this tour level. Limited stamina data favors...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Carolina Alves Training data through 2025-09 contains no head-to-head or recent form for these players. Carolina Alves receives a nominal home-surface edge... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Leolia Jeanjean |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 While Leolia Jeanjean is the favored player, Carolina Alves is a capable competitor, and both players predominantly prefer clay courts, whic...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Leolia Jeanjean Based on career-high rankings and more notable results, Leolia Jeanjean appears to be the slightly stronger player overall compared to Carol...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
over |
55%
Carolina Alves |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Given that Alves is favored, a 2-0 win for her is plausible, but Jeanjean has the potential to take a set. Therefore, the 'over' 2.5 sets ma...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Carolina Alves Carolina Alves is a more accomplished player on the WTA tour, with a higher career-high ranking and more experience in major tournaments. Ba... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Over 2.5 |
55%
Carolina Alves |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 With two fairly evenly matched players and no clear favorite, a three-set match is likely. Both have shown the ability to take sets off each...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Carolina Alves Based on training data through 2025-09, Carolina Alves has shown slightly better consistency on clay and hard courts, while Leolia Jeanjean... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 3/10
Best-of-three matches between players of similar tier (Jeanjean favored but not dominant) tend to go the distance. Alves is competitive enou...
Training data through 2025-09 shows lower-ranked players often produce straight-set matches on this tour level. Limited stamina data favors...
While Leolia Jeanjean is the favored player, Carolina Alves is a capable competitor, and both players predominantly prefer clay courts, whic...
Given that Alves is favored, a 2-0 win for her is plausible, but Jeanjean has the potential to take a set. Therefore, the 'over' 2.5 sets ma...
With two fairly evenly matched players and no clear favorite, a three-set match is likely. Both have shown the ability to take sets off each...
Match winner
ConsensusCarolina Alves 3/5
Leolia Jeanjean is a more established WTA player with superior ranking and consistency on hard courts (the presumed surface for the Kia Open...
Training data through 2025-09 contains no head-to-head or recent form for these players. Carolina Alves receives a nominal home-surface edge...
Based on career-high rankings and more notable results, Leolia Jeanjean appears to be the slightly stronger player overall compared to Carol...
Carolina Alves is a more accomplished player on the WTA tour, with a higher career-high ranking and more experience in major tournaments. Ba...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Carolina Alves has shown slightly better consistency on clay and hard courts, while Leolia Jeanjean...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Leolia Jeanjean
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Leolia Jeanjean
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Carolina Alves
DeepSeek V3
Carolina Alves
Grok 4 Fast
Carolina Alves
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
cb3c40e205b95a09…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 8 · 18:35 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39446,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Kia Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-08T18:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 08 Sep 2026 18:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Leolia Jeanjean",
"home": "Carolina Alves"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.