Capucine JauffretvsOksana Selekhmeteva
OSAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
under 2/10 models |
Oksana Selekhmeteva 3/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 1.5 |
62%
Capucine Jauffret |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 In best-of-three tennis, a straight-sets victory (2–0) is less likely than a competitive match that goes to a second set. While Jauffret is...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Capucine Jauffret Capucine Jauffret is a French hard-court specialist with superior ranking and recent form on the WTA circuit. Selekhmeteva is a capable but... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
under |
62%
Oksana Selekhmeteva |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under Lower-ranked players in early-round ITF events often produce straight-set matches. Limited data prevents surface-specific adjustments. Train...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Oksana Selekhmeteva Oksana Selekhmeteva has more established professional experience than Capucine Jauffret based on pre-2025 records. The match occurs far outs... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Over 2.5 |
65%
Oksana Selekhmeteva |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Given the lack of current form or head-to-head data for this future match, I anticipate a potentially competitive encounter. Even if Selekhm...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Oksana Selekhmeteva This prediction is based solely on my training data, as the match is scheduled for 2026 and real-time information is unavailable. Oksana Sel... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Oksana Selekhmeteva |
55%
Capucine Jauffret |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Oksana Selekhmeteva Given the slight favoritism towards Capucine Jauffret, a two-set victory is the most probable outcome. This aligns with the expectation of a...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Capucine Jauffret Based on general knowledge of player trajectories and typical performance patterns, Capucine Jauffret is slightly favored. While specific re... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
over_21.5 |
55%
Oksana Selekhmeteva |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_21.5 Given the likelihood of a three-set match and the serving styles of both players, the total games are expected to exceed 21.5. Both have sol...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Oksana Selekhmeteva Based on training data through 2025-09, Selekhmeteva has shown more consistent form on hard courts and a higher career ceiling, while Jauffr... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2/10
In best-of-three tennis, a straight-sets victory (2–0) is less likely than a competitive match that goes to a second set. While Jauffret is...
Lower-ranked players in early-round ITF events often produce straight-set matches. Limited data prevents surface-specific adjustments. Train...
Given the lack of current form or head-to-head data for this future match, I anticipate a potentially competitive encounter. Even if Selekhm...
Given the slight favoritism towards Capucine Jauffret, a two-set victory is the most probable outcome. This aligns with the expectation of a...
Given the likelihood of a three-set match and the serving styles of both players, the total games are expected to exceed 21.5. Both have sol...
Match winner
ConsensusOksana Selekhmeteva 3/5
Capucine Jauffret is a French hard-court specialist with superior ranking and recent form on the WTA circuit. Selekhmeteva is a capable but...
Oksana Selekhmeteva has more established professional experience than Capucine Jauffret based on pre-2025 records. The match occurs far outs...
This prediction is based solely on my training data, as the match is scheduled for 2026 and real-time information is unavailable. Oksana Sel...
Based on general knowledge of player trajectories and typical performance patterns, Capucine Jauffret is slightly favored. While specific re...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Selekhmeteva has shown more consistent form on hard courts and a higher career ceiling, while Jauffr...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Claude Haiku 4.5
Capucine Jauffret
Grok 4 Fast
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Capucine Jauffret
DeepSeek V3
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
e8ff3ce2fcb0c2de…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 22:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31142,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Ennoble Care Philly Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Oksana Selekhmeteva",
"home": "Capucine Jauffret"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.